Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 13/845,126

ADAPTIVE TRANSMISSION AND RECEIVING METHOD AND DEVICE IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM WITH MULTIPLE ANTENNAS

Non-Final OA §102§OTHER
Filed
Mar 18, 2013
Priority
Apr 01, 2003 — RE 10-2003-0020464 +4 more
Examiner
HUGHES, DEANDRA M
Art Unit
3992
Tech Center
3900
Assignee
Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute
OA Round
6 (Non-Final)
78%
Grant Probability
Favorable
6-7
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 78% — above average
78%
Career Allowance Rate
147 granted / 188 resolved
+18.2% vs TC avg
Strong +18% interview lift
Without
With
+18.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
15 currently pending
Career history
202
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§103
33.3%
-6.7% vs TC avg
§102
9.5%
-30.5% vs TC avg
§112
20.8%
-19.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 188 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §OTHER
The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 2. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (b) the invention was patented or described in a printed publication in this or a foreign country or in public use or on sale in this country, more than one year prior to the date of application for patent in the United States. 3. Claims 21-28 rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102b as being anticipated by Kim (US 7,123,887). Referring to Claim 21, Kim (US 7,123,887) teaches an adaptive communication method of a transmitter for transmitting data to a receiver through a wireless channel in a wireless communication system, comprising: transmitting from the transmitter a signal to the receiver through the wireless channel (see col. 2, lines 38-42); and receiving a feedback signal from the receiver, the feedback signal including a parameter from the receiver through the wireless channel (see Feedback in fig. 1), the parameter being for adaptive transmit based on the signal transmitted from the transmitter and being to be used for supporting determination of whether or not to use a transmit mode by the transmitter (see col. 3, lines 7-19), wherein the parameter includes channel coding information and space time block code (STBC) information derived from at least channel estimates determined at the receiver (see col. 4, lines 1-19). Claim 24 has similar limitations as claim 21. Referring to Claims 22 and 25, Kim (US 7,123,887) also teaches the STBC information indicating whether or not to use an STBC method (see col. 3, lines 7-19). Referring to Claims 23 and 26, Kim (US 7,123,887) also teaches the wireless channel is a multiple input multiple output (MIMO) channel (see col. 3, lines 7-19). Referring to Claims 27 and 28, Kim (US 7,123,887) also teaches the STBC information including an STBC performance parameter showing characteristics of a MIMO channel (see col. 3, lines 7-19). Response to Arguments 4. Applicant's arguments filed 8/20/2015 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The 102 rejection was maintained because the filing cannot change from a 35 111(a) continuation of a Reissue to a 35 USC 251 continuation reissue by just filing and ADS. A petition needs to be filed to change filing under 37 CFR 1.182. The petition under 37 CFR 1.182 needs to be filed including indicia upon filing the application that this application was intended to be filed as a 35 USC 251 continuation Reissue. Note: indicia that they intended to file a 35 USC 251 continuation reissue at the time of filing is outlined in MPEP 1451 as stated below: Indicia that a continuing reissue application is being filed are: PNG media_image1.png 18 19 media_image1.png Greyscale 1. A 37 CFR 1.175 reissue oath/declaration, which is not merely a copy of the parent’s reissue oath/declaration. PNG media_image1.png 18 19 media_image1.png Greyscale 2. A specification and/or claims in proper double column reissue format per 37 CFR 1.173. PNG media_image1.png 18 19 media_image1.png Greyscale 3. Amendments in proper format per 37 CFR 1.175. PNG media_image1.png 18 19 media_image1.png Greyscale 4. A 37 CFR 3.73 statement of assignee ownership and consent by assignee. PNG media_image1.png 18 19 media_image1.png Greyscale 5. A correct transmittal letter identifying the application as a reissue filing under 35 U.S.C. § 251. It is recommended that Form PTO/AIA /50 be used. PNG media_image1.png 18 19 media_image1.png Greyscale 6. An identification of the application as being "a reissue continuation of application number [the parent reissue application]" or "a continuation and reissue of application number [the parent reissue application]" or equivalent language, rather than being "a continuation of reissue application number [the parent reissue application]." None of which appears evident. Another option is to file a new application as a continuation reissue. However, the applicant would not be entitled to a broadening reissue filed within two years of the original patent and therefore risk rejection of all broadened claims under 35 USC 251 as broadening claims more than two years after patent grant. Conclusion 5. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any extension fee pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EUGENE YUN whose telephone number is (571)272-7860. The examiner can normally be reached on 9:00am-6:00pm. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nay Maung can be reached on (571)272-7882. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Eugene Yun Primary Examiner Art Unit 2647 /EUGENE YUN/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2647
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 19 earlier events
Feb 09, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 30, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 10, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 30, 2024
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 01, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 21, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 27, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 08, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent RE50951
MULTI-IMAGE DISPLAY APPARATUS PROVIDING HOLOGRAPHIC IMAGE
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent RE50946
Wireless Coordination of Audio Sources
2y 7m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12665375
OPTICAL AMPLIFICATION DEVICE AND OPTICAL AMPLIFICATION METHOD
3y 8m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12665378
OPTICAL SEMICONDUCTOR DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent RE50927
BLADE PORTIONER CALIBRATION
2y 3m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

6-7
Expected OA Rounds
78%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+18.4%)
2y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 188 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month