Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 15/569,724

WOUND DRESSING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Oct 26, 2017
Examiner
FISHER, VICTORIA HICKS
Art Unit
3786
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Medtrade Products Limited
OA Round
9 (Non-Final)
40%
Grant Probability
Moderate
9-10
OA Rounds
4y 10m
To Grant
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 40% of resolved cases
40%
Career Allow Rate
273 granted / 676 resolved
-29.6% vs TC avg
Strong +38% interview lift
Without
With
+38.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 10m
Avg Prosecution
64 currently pending
Career history
740
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.8%
-33.2% vs TC avg
§103
38.7%
-1.3% vs TC avg
§102
21.1%
-18.9% vs TC avg
§112
31.6%
-8.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 676 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION This action is in response to the Request for Continued Examination (RCE) filed 5/22/2025. Currently, claims 13, 15-23 and 25 are pending in the application. Claims 1-12, 14 and 24 are cancelled by Applicant. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 5/22/2025 has been entered. Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the claim(s) have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. A new ground(s) of rejection is provided in view of Hammons et al. (US 7,910,195 B2). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 13, 15, 17-19, 23 and 25 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hammons et al. (US 7,910,195 B2) in view of Stapf (US 2003/0120194 A1). In regards to claim 13, Hammons et al. teaches in Figures 1 and 2, column 3, lines 36-37, columns 3-4, lines 63-2, column 4, lines 5-10 and 32, column 7, lines 51-52 and column 16, lines 16-18 a first layer (second precursor web 21) of a wicking material (second precursor web 21; column 16, lines 16-18 teaches that fluid can be “wicked through second precursor web 21”) and a second layer (first precursor web 20) of an absorbent fiber material (first precursor web 20; columns 3-4, lines 63-2 teaches “first precursor web 20 is a relatively hydrophilic nonwoven web” and “for all nonwoven webs, the hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity can be achieved by use of fibers;” a hydrophilic material is an absorbent material; column 4, line 32 teaches “constituent fibers of nonwoven precursor web 20”), wherein the wicking material (second precursor web 21) and the absorbent fiber material (first precursor web 20) are bonded together by an adhesive to form bonded layers (column 3, lines 36-37 teaches “precursor webs 20 and 21 (and any additional webs) can be joined by adhesive”); the wicking material (second precursor web 21) has a plurality of small holes (openings 4) extending through (as shown in Figure 2; column 7, lines 51-52 teaches “openings 4 in second precursor web 21”) the wicking material (second precursor web 21); and the fibers (column 4, lines 5-7 teaches “discrete tufts 6 which are integral extensions of the fibers of at least first precursor web 20”) of the absorbent fiber material (first precursor web 20) penetrate through (as shown in Figures 1 and 2; column 4, lines 8-10 teaches “each tuft 6 can comprise a plurality of looped, aligned fibers 8 extending through second precursor web 21;” column 7, lines 51-52 teaches “tufts 6 can extend through openings 4 in second precursor web 21”) the plurality of small holes (openings 4) in the wicking material (second precursor web 21) such that at least some of the fibers of the absorbent fiber material (first precursor web 20) extend from (as shown in Figures 1 and 2) a non-wound facing surface (bottom surface of second precursor web 21) of the wicking material (second precursor web 21) to (as shown in Figures 1 and 2) a wound facing surface (top surface of second precursor web 21) of the wicking material (second precursor web 21) and are thus exposed on (as shown in Figures 1 and 2) the wound facing surface (top surface of second precursor web 21) of the wicking material (second precursor web 21). Hammons et al. does not teach that the wicking material is in the form of a foam. However, Stapf teaches in [0036] an analogous device wherein the wicking material (support member 110) is in the form of a foam ([0036] teaches “support member 110 is preferably made of a foam material, preferably an absorbent foam” and “an example of a suitable absorbent foam is a naturally open-celled polyurethane foam that is selected to have favorable characteristics of liquid absorbency, wicking, and resevoiring”). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing of the present invention to modify the wicking material of Hammons et al. to be in the form of a foam as taught by Stapf because this element is known “to have favorable characteristics of liquid absorbency, wicking, and resevoiring,” as Stapf teaches in [0036]. In regards to claim 15, Hammons et al. and Stapf teach the apparatus of claim 13. Hammons et al. teaches in column 4, lines 32-33 that the absorbent fiber material (first precursor web 20) comprises a polymeric material (column 4, lines 32-33 teaches “the constituent fibers of nonwoven precursor web 20 or 21 can be comprised of polymers”). In regards to claim 17, Hammons et al. and Stapf teach the apparatus of claim 13. Hammons et al. teaches in column 4, line 32 that the absorbent fiber material (first precursor web 20) forms a non-woven layer (column 4, line 32 teaches “nonwoven precursor web 20 or 21”). In regards to claims 18 and 19, Hammons et al. and Stapf teach the apparatus of claim 13. Hammons et al. teaches in column 15, lines 18-20 that the wicking material (second precursor web 21) comprises either a hydrophilic or hydrophobic material (column 15, lines 18-20 teaches “second precursor web 21 can be comprised of relatively hydrophobic fibers”); wherein the hydrophilic material is selected from polyurethane foams, and the hydrophobic material is selected from polyethylene foams (Applicant should note that the hydrophilic material is not required by the claim(s)). In regards to claim 23, Hammons et al. teaches in Figures 1 and 2, column 1, lines 26-29, column 2, lines 19-22, column 3, lines 36-37, columns 3-4, lines 63-2, column 4, lines 5-10 and 32, column 7, lines 17-19 and 51-52 and column 16, lines 16-18 a first layer (second precursor web 21) of a wicking material (second precursor web 21; column 16, lines 16-18 teaches that fluid can be “wicked through second precursor web 21”) and a second layer (first precursor web 20) of an absorbent fiber material (first precursor web 20; columns 3-4, lines 63-2 teaches “first precursor web 20 is a relatively hydrophilic nonwoven web” and “for all nonwoven webs, the hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity can be achieved by use of fibers;” a hydrophilic material is an absorbent material; column 4, line 32 teaches “constituent fibers of nonwoven precursor web 20”), whereby the absorbent fiber material (first precursor web 20) is punched into and/or through (as shown in Figures 1 and 2; column 4, lines 8-10 teaches “each tuft 6 can comprise a plurality of looped, aligned fibers 8 extending through second precursor web 21;” column 7, lines 17-19 teaches “portions of first precursor web 20 can extend through, (i.e., ‘punch through’ so to speak), second precursor web 21;” column 7, lines 51-52 teaches “tufts 6 can extend through openings 4 in second precursor web 21”) the wicking material (second precursor web 21), and the fibers (column 4, lines 5-7 teaches “discrete tufts 6 which are integral extensions of the fibers of at least first precursor web 20”) of the absorbent fiber material (first precursor web 20) penetrate through (as shown in Figures 1 and 2; column 4, lines 8-10 teaches “each tuft 6 can comprise a plurality of looped, aligned fibers 8 extending through second precursor web 21;” column 7, lines 17-19 teaches “portions of first precursor web 20 can extend through, (i.e., ‘punch through’ so to speak), second precursor web 21;” column 7, lines 51-52 teaches “tufts 6 can extend through openings 4 in second precursor web 21”) the wicking material (second precursor web 21) such that some of the fibers of the absorbent fiber material (first precursor web 20) extend from (as shown in Figures 1 and 2) a non-wound facing surface (bottom surface of second precursor web 21) of the wicking material (second precursor web 21) to (as shown in Figures 1 and 2) a wound facing surface (top surface of second precursor web 21) of the wicking material (second precursor web 21) and are thus exposed on (as shown in Figures 1 and 2) the wound facing surface (top surface of second precursor web 21) of the wicking material (second precursor web 21), and wherein the wicking material (second precursor web 21) and the absorbent fiber material (first precursor web 20) are bonded together by an adhesive to form bonded layers (column 3, lines 36-37 teaches “precursor webs 20 and 21 (and any additional webs) can be joined by adhesive”) in absorbing fluid discharged from a physiological target (column 2, lines 21-22 teaches “the present invention comprises a sanitary napkin intended to be used as a menstrual pad”), or in stemming a flow of a fluid discharged from a physiological target site, the use comprising applying the wound dressing composition to the wound site (column 2, lines 19-20 teaches “the present invention can be utilized in any of known disposable absorbent products;” column 1, lines 26-29 teaches “disposable absorbent articles such as baby diapers, adult incontinence products, sanitary napkins, pantiliners, hemorrhoid treatment pads, bandages, and the like are well known in the art;” bandages are understood to be wounds dressings that are applied to wound sites). Hammons et al. does not teach that the wicking material is in the form of a foam. However, Stapf teaches in [0036] an analogous device wherein the wicking material (support member 110) is in the form of a foam ([0036] teaches “support member 110 is preferably made of a foam material, preferably an absorbent foam” and “an example of a suitable absorbent foam is a naturally open-celled polyurethane foam that is selected to have favorable characteristics of liquid absorbency, wicking, and resevoiring”). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing of the present invention to modify the wicking material of Hammons et al. to be in the form of a foam as taught by Stapf because this element is known “to have favorable characteristics of liquid absorbency, wicking, and resevoiring,” as Stapf teaches in [0036]. In regards to claim 25, Hammons et al. teaches in Figures 1 and 2, column 3, lines 36-37, columns 3-4, lines 63-2, column 4, lines 5-10 and 32, column 7, lines 17-19 and 51-52 and column 16, lines 16-18 a first layer (second precursor web 21) of a wicking material (second precursor web 21; column 16, lines 16-18 teaches that fluid can be “wicked through second precursor web 21”) and a second layer (first precursor web 20) of an absorbent fiber material (first precursor web 20; columns 3-4, lines 63-2 teaches “first precursor web 20 is a relatively hydrophilic nonwoven web” and “for all nonwoven webs, the hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity can be achieved by use of fibers;” a hydrophilic material is an absorbent material; column 4, line 32 teaches “constituent fibers of nonwoven precursor web 20”), whereby the absorbent fiber material (first precursor web 20) is punched into and/or through (as shown in Figures 1 and 2; column 4, lines 8-10 teaches “each tuft 6 can comprise a plurality of looped, aligned fibers 8 extending through second precursor web 21;” column 7, lines 17-19 teaches “portions of first precursor web 20 can extend through, (i.e., ‘punch through’ so to speak), second precursor web 21;” column 7, lines 51-52 teaches “tufts 6 can extend through openings 4 in second precursor web 21”) the wicking material (second precursor web 21), and the fibers (column 4, lines 5-7 teaches “discrete tufts 6 which are integral extensions of the fibers of at least first precursor web 20”) of the absorbent fiber material (first precursor web 20) penetrate through (as shown in Figures 1 and 2; column 4, lines 8-10 teaches “each tuft 6 can comprise a plurality of looped, aligned fibers 8 extending through second precursor web 21;” column 7, lines 17-19 teaches “portions of first precursor web 20 can extend through, (i.e., ‘punch through’ so to speak), second precursor web 21;” column 7, lines 51-52 teaches “tufts 6 can extend through openings 4 in second precursor web 21”) the wicking material (second precursor web 21) such that some of the fibers of the absorbent fiber material (first precursor web 20) extend from (as shown in Figures 1 and 2) a non-wound facing surface (bottom surface of second precursor web 21) of the wicking material (second precursor web 21) to (as shown in Figures 1 and 2) a wound facing surface (top surface of second precursor web 21) of the wicking material (second precursor web 21) and are thus exposed on (as shown in Figures 1 and 2) the wound facing surface (top surface of second precursor web 21) of the wicking material (second precursor web 21), and wherein the wicking material (second precursor web 21) and the absorbent fiber material (first precursor web 20) are bonded together by an adhesive to form bonded layers (column 3, lines 36-37 teaches “precursor webs 20 and 21 (and any additional webs) can be joined by adhesive”). Hammons et al. does not teach that the wicking material is in the form of a foam. However, Stapf teaches in [0036] an analogous device wherein the wicking material (support member 110) is in the form of a foam ([0036] teaches “support member 110 is preferably made of a foam material, preferably an absorbent foam” and “an example of a suitable absorbent foam is a naturally open-celled polyurethane foam that is selected to have favorable characteristics of liquid absorbency, wicking, and resevoiring”). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing of the present invention to modify the wicking material of Hammons et al. to be in the form of a foam as taught by Stapf because this element is known “to have favorable characteristics of liquid absorbency, wicking, and resevoiring,” as Stapf teaches in [0036]. Claim(s) 16 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hammons et al. (US 7,910,195 B2), in view of Stapf (US 2003/0120194 A1) and further in view of LIN (US 2019/0030225 A1). In regards to claim 16, Hammons et al. and Stapf teach the apparatus of claims 13 and 15. Hammons et al. and Stapf do not teach that the polymeric material is selected from poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), polyethylene oxide (PEO) and polyacrylic acid. However, LIN teaches in [0043] an analogous device wherein the polymeric material is selected from poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA), polyethylene oxide (PEO) and polyacrylic acid ([0043] teaches “pad, as used herein, may include a range of absorbent materials that absorb exudate including open-cell foam composed, for example, of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polyurethane or other polymer foam”). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing of the present invention to modify the polymeric material of Hammons et al. as modified by Stapf to be poly(vinyl alcohol) (PVA) as taught by LIN because this element is known in the art to be a suitable absorbent polymer material for absorbing exudate, as LIN teaches in [0043]. Claim(s) 20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hammons et al. (US 7,910,195 B2) in view of LIN (US 2019/0030225 A1). In regards to claim 20, Hammons et al. teaches in Figures 1 and 2, column 3, lines 30-37, columns 3-4, lines 63-2, column 4, lines 5-10 and 32, column 7, lines 17-19 and 51-52 and column 16, lines 16-18 the steps of: (a) providing (column 3, lines 30-33 teaches “Web 1 can comprise one layer, but in a preferred embodiment comprises at least two layers. The layers are referred to herein as generally planar, two-dimensional precursor webs, such as first precursor web 20 and second precursor web 21.”) a layer of a wicking material (second precursor web 21; column 16, lines 16-18 teaches that fluid can be “wicked through second precursor web 21”) and a layer of an absorbent fiber material (first precursor web 20; columns 3-4, lines 63-2 teaches “first precursor web 20 is a relatively hydrophilic nonwoven web” and “for all nonwoven webs, the hydrophobicity or hydrophilicity can be achieved by use of fibers;” a hydrophilic material is an absorbent material; column 4, line 32 teaches “constituent fibers of nonwoven precursor web 20”); (b) attaching the layer of wicking material (second precursor web 21) to the layer of absorbent fiber material (first precursor web 20) by an adhesive to form bonded layers (column 3, lines 36-37 teaches “precursor webs 20 and 21 (and any additional webs) can be joined by adhesive”); and (c) punching (as shown in Figures 1 and 2; column 4, lines 8-10 teaches “each tuft 6 can comprise a plurality of looped, aligned fibers 8 extending through second precursor web 21;” column 7, lines 17-19 teaches “portions of first precursor web 20 can extend through, (i.e., ‘punch through’ so to speak), second precursor web 21;” column 7, lines 51-52 teaches “tufts 6 can extend through openings 4 in second precursor web 21”) a plurality of holes (openings 4) in the bonded (column 3, lines 36-37 teaches “precursor webs 20 and 21 (and any additional webs) can be joined by adhesive”) layers (precursor webs 20 and 21), whereby the absorbent fiber material (first precursor web 20) is punched through (as shown in Figures 1 and 2; column 4, lines 8-10 teaches “each tuft 6 can comprise a plurality of looped, aligned fibers 8 extending through second precursor web 21;” column 7, lines 17-19 teaches “portions of first precursor web 20 can extend through, (i.e., ‘punch through’ so to speak), second precursor web 21;” column 7, lines 51-52 teaches “tufts 6 can extend through openings 4 in second precursor web 21”) the layer of wicking material (second precursor web 21), and the fibers (column 4, lines 5-7 teaches “discrete tufts 6 which are integral extensions of the fibers of at least first precursor web 20”) of the absorbent fiber material (first precursor web 20) penetrate through (as shown in Figures 1 and 2; column 4, lines 8-10 teaches “each tuft 6 can comprise a plurality of looped, aligned fibers 8 extending through second precursor web 21;” column 7, lines 17-19 teaches “portions of first precursor web 20 can extend through, (i.e., ‘punch through’ so to speak), second precursor web 21;” column 7, lines 51-52 teaches “tufts 6 can extend through openings 4 in second precursor web 21”) the plurality of holes (openings 4) such that at least some of the fibers of the absorbent fiber material (first precursor web 20) extend from (as shown in Figures 1 and 2) a non-wound facing surface (bottom surface of second precursor web 21) of the wicking material (second precursor web 21) to (as shown in Figures 1 and 2) a wound facing surface (top surface of second precursor web 21) of the wicking material (second precursor web 21) and are thus exposed on (as shown in Figures 1 and 2) the wound facing surface (top surface of second precursor web 21) of the wicking material (second precursor web 21) Hammons et al. does not teach that the absorbent material is in the form of a foam. However, LIN teaches in [0043] an analogous device wherein the absorbent material is in the form of a foam ([0043] teaches “pad, as used herein, may include a range of absorbent materials that absorb exudate including open-cell foam composed, for example, of polyvinyl alcohol (PVA), polyurethane or other polymer foam”). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing of the present invention to modify the method of Hammons et al. to include that the absorbent material is in the form of a foam as taught by LIN because this element is known in the art to be a suitable absorbent material for absorbing exudate, as LIN teaches in [0043]. Claim(s) 21 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hammons et al. (US 7,910,195 B2), in view of LIN (US 2019/0030225 A1) and further in view of Suzuki et al. (US 4,969,970). In regards to claim 21, Hammons et al. and LIN teach the method of claim 20. Hammons et al. and LIN do not teach that the layer are bonded using a heat meltable adhesive. However, Suzuki et al. teaches in column 8, lines 9-17 an analogous method wherein the first layer and the second layer (“continuous backsheet” and “foam sheet” layers) are bonded (taught to be “joined integrally”) using a heat meltable adhesive (“adhesive of hot melt type”). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing of the invention to modify the method of Hammons et al. as modified by LIN to include that the layer of a wicking material and the layer of an absorbent material are bonded using a heat meltable adhesive as taught by Suzuki et al. because this element is known to more securely integrally join the layers to form a continuous composite sheet, as Suzuki et al. teaches in column 8, lines 9-17. Claim(s) 22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hammons et al. (US 7,910,195 B2), in view of LIN (US 2019/0030225 A1) and further in view of Cree et al. (US 2004/0161586 A1). In regards to claim 22, Hammons et al. and LIN teach the method of claim 20. Hammons et al. and LIN do not teach that the plurality of holes are punched in the bonded layers using a roller having a plurality of needles thereon. However, Cree et al. teaches in Figures 9 and 10 and [0026] and analogous method wherein the plurality of holes (macro-apertures 18) are punched (“puncturing,” using heated pins 20; see [0026]) in the bonded layers (composite material 36 formed by the bonding of second material 34 to film layer 14) using a roller (drum 24) having a plurality of needles (heated pins 20) thereon (as shown in Figure 9). It would have been obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing of the invention to modify the method of Hammons et al. as modified by LIN to include that the plurality of holes are punched in the bonded layers using a roller having a plurality of needles thereon as taught by Cree et al. because this step is known to provide a composite material having the plurality of holes therein, as Cree et al. teaches in [0026]. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to VICTORIA H FISHER whose telephone number is (571)270-7033. The examiner can normally be reached M-TH 6:00AM-4:00PM EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Rachael Bredefeld can be reached at (571) 270-5237. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /VICTORIA HICKS FISHER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3786 1/22/2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 26, 2017
Application Filed
Dec 05, 2019
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 10, 2019
Applicant Interview
Dec 10, 2019
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 25, 2020
Response Filed
May 12, 2020
Final Rejection — §103
Nov 17, 2020
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 18, 2020
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 09, 2021
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Feb 11, 2022
Response Filed
Mar 10, 2022
Final Rejection — §103
Aug 10, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 13, 2022
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 26, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 06, 2022
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 29, 2022
Response Filed
Apr 24, 2023
Final Rejection — §103
Oct 27, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 27, 2023
Notice of Allowance
Nov 30, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 21, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 22, 2024
Response Filed
Dec 17, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
Mar 20, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 20, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
May 22, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
May 27, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 22, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594179
BRACE TO COVER ATROPHY IN THE SHOULDER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12539200
DEVICES FOR TREATING TRISMUS AND METHODS OF USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12508141
RESTING ORTHOSIS FOR A JOINT
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12508149
NASAL CAVITY INSERTION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 30, 2025
Patent 12491105
ANTI SNORING APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

9-10
Expected OA Rounds
40%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+38.4%)
4y 10m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 676 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month