Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 15/605,890

CONTROL OF AN ELECTRONIC VAPORIZER

Final Rejection §103
Filed
May 25, 2017
Examiner
WOLFF, ARIELLE R
Art Unit
3785
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Juul Labs Inc.
OA Round
8 (Final)
47%
Grant Probability
Moderate
9-10
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
79%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 47% of resolved cases
47%
Career Allow Rate
82 granted / 173 resolved
-22.6% vs TC avg
Strong +32% interview lift
Without
With
+32.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
219
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
§103
57.4%
+17.4% vs TC avg
§102
13.1%
-26.9% vs TC avg
§112
21.2%
-18.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 173 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is in response to the filing on 12/30/2025. Since the previous filing, claim 51 has been amended and no claims have been added or cancelled. Thus, claims 20-21, 36-38, 42-43, 45-51 and 53-54 are pending in the application. In regards to the previous 103 rejections, Applicant’s arguments are not persuasive and these rejections are maintained, modified for the amendments, below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 20-21, 36-38, 42-43, 45-50 and 53-54 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Juster (US 2016/0143361) in view of Tremblay (US 2015/0181945), Todd (US 2012/0304990), Minskoff (US 2016/0021930), Hawes (US 2016/0360789) and Bellinger (US 2015/0359263). In regards to claim 20, Juster discloses a method comprising: receiving, at one or more processors (processing circuitry 200 may include processor 310, paragraph 88 line 4-5), first data (memory 410 may contain information about the contents of the container 420 such as the substance type, paragraph 100 line 10-13) associated with a cartridge identifier (reservoir memory 410, paragraph 99 line 5, processor 310 able to communicate and transfer data stored in reservoir 345, paragraph 93 line 2-3) on a vaporizer cartridge (reservoir 345, see Annotated Fig 4), the vaporizer cartridge coupled to a vaporizer device (see Annotated Fig 4), the first data comprising information related to an age-restriction associated with a vaporizable material within the vaporizer cartridge (reservoir 345 contains reservoir memory 410, paragraph 99 line 5-8 which may contain information about the contents of the container 420 such as the substance type, paragraph 100 line 10-13, the substance which may be at least in part nicotine, paragraph 100 line 16-17, legal restrictions concerning the use of nicotine products include minimum age requirements); a second data corresponding to the user identification via at least one of a user interface or a detection device associated with the user interface (identification data acquired by PC, laptop, smartphone or wearable device, paragraph 111 line 35-39); based at least on the receiving of the second data, authenticating the user identification (user information used to ensure proper use of device 300, paragraph 111 line 39-42). PNG media_image1.png 709 417 media_image1.png Greyscale Annotated Fig 4 Juster does not disclose causing a generating of a request for user identification in a user interface wherein said request for user identification is caused by receiving of the first data associated with the cartridge identifier or determining a stored user profile corresponding to the user identification and determining that the stored user profile includes security settings associated with the first data, and authenticating user identification by performing age analysis in which an age of the user is determined based on a comparison of registered user identification information in the stored user profile and the first data and determining that the age of the user satisfies a minimum age requirement, and wherein based on the authenticating the user identification, receiving, at the one or more processors, a third data associated with the cartridge identifier on the vaporizer cartridge, the third data including a nominal resistance of a heater of the cartridge, verifying, based at least on the nominal resistance of the heater and a resistance of the heater measured by a resistance measurement circuit in the vaporizer device, an operational status of the resistance measurement circuit, upon verifying the operational status of the resistance measurement circuit, causing the vaporizer device to operate consistent with one or more parameters determined by the one or more processors, the one or more parameters including at least one temperature- related parameter determined based on the resistance of the heater measured by the resistance measurement circuit in the vaporizer device, and writing to the cartridge identifier, a fourth data associated with the operation of the vaporizer device, the fourth data including a usage information corresponding to a first quantity of the vaporizable material remaining in the vaporizer cartridge subsequent to the operation of the vaporizer device. However, Todd teaches based at least on the receiving of the first data associated with the cartridge identifier (medical dose cartridge has data recognition means for the purpose of verifying use and user, paragraph 111 line 15-18), and in response generating a request for user identification (method comprises step wherein system verifies authorized use of dosage form by user, paragraph 23, 25, 38, 42, 48, verification of authorized user follows identification of the cartridge, claim 48, 49 and 51). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Juster such that based at least on the receiving of the first data associated with the cartridge identifier, causing presenting a request for user identification as taught by Todd as this would ensure that not only the vaporizer device but also the vaporizable material contained within the reservoir is used properly by the correct individuals. Further, Tremblay teaches causing presenting of a request for user identification (authorization information 700, paragraph 161) in a user interface generated on a display by the one or more processors (information 700 may be provided as a response to a request presented on the user interface of mobile communication device 400, paragraph 161) and wherein based on the authenticating the user identification, causing the vaporizer device to operate consistent with one or more parameters determined by the one or more processors (device enables vapor providing capability when authorization information received, paragraph 160 line 7-11). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Juster to cause a presenting of a request for user identification in a user interface generated on a display by the one or more processors and wherein based on the authenticating the user identification, causing the vaporizer device to operate consistent with one or more parameters determined by the one or more processors as taught by Tremblay as this would provide a clear method for which to provide the user with instructions and to ensure the vaporizer receives the necessary information to confirm user identity by matching received information against previously collected information (paragraph 162 line 1-5) to prevent unauthorized use. While Juster discloses age verification (paragraph 111 line 36-40) and profile data associated with the user (paragraph 29 and claim 22), it does not disclose determining a stored user profile corresponding to the user identification and determining that the stored user profile includes security settings associated with the first data, and authenticating user identification by performing age analysis in which an age of the user is determined based on a comparison of registered user identification information in the stored user profile and the first data and determining that the age of the user satisfies a minimum age requirement. However, Minskoff teaches an electronic vaporizer with the capability of determining a stored user profile corresponding to the user identification and determining that the stored user profile includes security settings associated with the first data, and authenticating user identification by performing age analysis in which an age of the user is determined based on a comparison of registered user identification information in the stored user profile and the first data and determining that the age of the user satisfies a minimum age requirement (paragraph 405 line 1-6). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Juster such that determining a stored user profile corresponding to the user identification and determining that the stored user profile includes security settings associated with the first data, and authenticating user identification by performing age analysis in which an age of the user is determined based on a comparison of registered user identification information in the stored user profile and the first data and determining that the age of the user satisfies a minimum age requirement as taught by Minskoff as this would allow the device to accurately determine an appropriate user of the device to prevent improper usage of the device. Additionally, Hawes teaches writing to the cartridge identifier (pod system 2200 includes CC-NVM 2205 which comprises non-volatile memory 2205b, paragraph 112 and 113, memory 2205b may record information from the controller 2105, paragraph 119), a third data associated with the operation of the vaporizer device, the third data including a usage information corresponding to a first quantity of the vaporizable material remaining in the vaporizer cartridge subsequent to the operation of the vaporizer device (level of vapor precursor tracked, paragraph 75 line 12-14). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Juster to write to the cartridge identifier a third data associated with the operation of the vaporizer device, the third data including a usage information corresponding to a first quantity of the vaporizable material remaining in the vaporizer cartridge subsequent to the operation of the vaporizer device as taught by Hawes as this would allow the cartridge to retain operational data between uses (Hawes: paragraph 6 line 11-13). Further still, Bellinger teaches receiving, at the one or more processors, a third data associated with the cartridge identifier on the vaporizer cartridge, the third data including a nominal resistance of a heater of the cartridge, verifying, based at least on the nominal resistance of the heater and a resistance of the heater measured by a resistance measurement circuit in the vaporizer device, an operational status of the resistance measurement circuit (device receives information regarding manufacturers specification for heater resistance as well as a measured resistance of the heater on activation which are used to establish operational parameters of the heater, paragraph 39), upon verifying the operational status of the resistance measurement circuit, the one or more parameters including at least one temperature- related parameter determined based on the resistance of the heater measured by the resistance measurement circuit in the vaporizer device (paragraph 34). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Juster receiving, at the one or more processors, a third data associated with the cartridge identifier on the vaporizer cartridge, the third data including a nominal resistance of a heater of the cartridge, verifying, based at least on the nominal resistance of the heater and a resistance of the heater measured by a resistance measurement circuit in the vaporizer device, an operational status of the resistance measurement circuit and, upon verifying the operational status of the resistance measurement circuit, the one or more parameters including at least one temperature- related parameter determined based on the resistance of the heater measured by the resistance measurement circuit in the vaporizer device as taught by Bellinger as this would allow the device to provide a precise heating based on the status of the heater throughout usage of the device. In regards to claim 21, Juster in view of Tremblay, Todd, Minskoff, Hawes and Bellinger teaches the method of claim 20 and Juster further discloses further comprising: pairing a communication device (device may communicate with one or more external computing devices, paragraph 96 line 7-11) with the vaporizer device, the pairing comprising establishing a wireless communication channel (communication between device and external computing device may be wireless, paragraph 90 line 16-19 and paragraph 96 line 11-14) between a first communication hardware of the communication device (external computing device 375) and a second communication hardware of the vaporizer device (host interface 370 communicates with external computing device, paragraph 96 line 11-14), the communication device comprising the one or more processors and the display for the user interface (paragraph 96 line 8-11); the one or more processors causing the vaporizer device to operate in accordance with the one or more parameters by at least transmitting, via the wireless communication channel, a fourth data corresponding to the one or more parameters to the vaporizer device from the communication device (interaction with external computing device may alter operating parameters of device 300, paragraph 111 line 32-35 and 48-54). In regards to claim 36, Juster in view of Tremblay, Todd, Minskoff, Hawes and Bellinger teaches the method of claim 21 and Juster further discloses wherein the vaporizer cartridge (reservoir 345, paragraph 99 line 4) comprises the cartridge identifier (reservoir 345 contains reservoir memory 410, paragraph 99 line 5-8 which may contain information about the contents of the container 420 such as the substance type, paragraph 100 line 10-13), the vaporizable material (reservoir 345 includes container 420 configured to store pre-vapor formulation 430, paragraph 100 line 1-4), a controller (operating system processing circuitry 200, paragraph 88 line 3-4), and one or more vaporizer body contacts in communication with the controller (operating system processing circuitry 200 comprises reservoir interface 340, paragraph 88 line 3-5); wherein the cartridge identifier comprises a cartridge memory (reservoir memory 410) storing the first data (reservoir memory 410 contains information about the contents of the container 420 such as the substance type, paragraph 100 line 10-13). The embodiment of Figures 3 and 4 of Juster do not teach wherein a cartridge comprises the heater and one or more cartridge contacts, and wherein a vaporizer device comprises a power source, and wherein the vaporizer device and the vaporizer cartridge are configured such that, when coupled, the one or more vaporizer body contacts engage the one or more cartridge contacts; wherein the one or more cartridge contacts and the one or more vaporizer body contacts are configured to, when engaged, form a data exchange circuit, and through which the one or more processors receives the first data associated with the cartridge identifier comprises accessing the first data from the cartridge memory. However, the embodiment of Figures 1 and 2 teach wherein a cartridge (section 70) comprises the heater (section 70 contains heater 14, paragraph 66 line 2-4) and one or more cartridge contacts (cathode connector piece 37, paragraph 70 line 4-8), and wherein a vaporizer device (section 72) comprises a power source (power source 1, paragraph 79 line 5-6), and wherein the vaporizer device and the vaporizer cartridge are configured such that, when coupled, the one or more vaporizer body contacts engage the one or more cartridge contacts (cathode connector 37 may provide connection to the reservoir interface of operating system circuitry 200, paragraph 70 line 4-7); wherein the one or more cartridge contacts and the one or more vaporizer body contacts are configured to, when engaged, form a data exchange circuit (cathode connector piece may provide connection between data communication bus and operating system processing circuitry 200 or reservoir interface, paragraph 70 line 4-8 and paragraph 93), through which the one or more processors receives the data associated with the cartridge identifier comprises accessing the first data from the cartridge memory (paragraph 93). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the embodiment of Figures 3 and 4 of Juster such that the cartridge comprises a heater and one or more cartridge contacts, and wherein a vaporizer device comprises a power source, and wherein the vaporizer device and the vaporizer cartridge are configured such that, when coupled, the one or more vaporizer body contacts engage the one or more cartridge contacts; wherein the one or more cartridge contacts and the one or more vaporizer body contacts are configured to, when engaged, form a data exchange circuit, through which the one or more processors receives the first data associated with the cartridge identifier comprises accessing the first data from the cartridge memory as taught by the embodiment of Figures 1 and 2 of Juster as placing the heater in the cartridge would place it in proximity to the vaporizable material while placing the battery in the body would prevent the heater from being triggered accidentally while the device is not in use, the cartridge and body contacts engaging to form a data exchange circuit between the cartridge and the body would allow the controller and the cartridge identifier and memory to communicate effectively to ensure proper operation the device. In regards to claim 37, Juster in view of Tremblay, Todd, Minskoff, Hawes and Bellinger teaches the method of claim 20 and the combination further discloses wherein the causing presenting of the request for the user identification comprises a request for age verification of the user of the vaporizer device (Tremblay: paragraph 161 line 7-14). In regards to claim 38, Juster in view of Tremblay, Todd, Minskoff, Hawes and Bellinger teaches the method of claim 20 and Juster further discloses wherein: the second data a biometric authentication marker (device uses biometric information, paragraph 111 line 36-38). Juster does not disclose wherein authenticating the user identification further includes determining that the data related to the biometric authentication marker matches a stored biometric authentication marker associated with a registered user profile, the registered user profile comprising age information. However, Minskoff teaches wherein authenticating the user identification includes determining that the data related to the biometric authentication marker (paragraph 361) matches a stored biometric authentication marker associated with a registered user profile (paragraph 405 line 1-6). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Juster such that authenticating the user identification includes determining that the data related to the biometric authentication marker matches a stored biometric authentication marker associated with a registered user profile as taught by Minskoff as this would allow the device to easily ascertain user information and verify user identity. In regards to claim 42, Juster in view of Tremblay, Todd, Minskoff, Hawes and Bellinger teaches the method of claim 20 and Juster further discloses wherein the one or more processors cause the vaporizer device to operate in accordance with the one or more parameters determined by at least enabling operation of the vaporizer device to heat and vaporize of the vaporizable material (paragraph 111 line 36-40). In regards to claim 43, Juster in view of Tremblay, Todd, Minskoff, Hawes and Bellinger teaches the method of claim 20 and Juster further discloses wherein the first data associated with the cartridge identifier further comprises an identifying information related to the vaporizable material within the vaporizer cartridge (reservoir memory 410, paragraph 99 line 5-8 which may contain information about the contents of the container 420 such as the substance type, paragraph 100 line 10-13). In regards to claim 45, Juster in view of Tremblay, Todd, Minskoff, Hawes and Bellinger teaches the method of claim 43. Juster does not disclose determining, by the one or more processor, the one or more parameters from at least a user preference information and the identifying information related to the vaporizable material, the user preference information comprising a use profile associated with at least one of the identifying information related to the vaporizable material. However, Minskoff teaches a method of operating a vaporizer comprising determining, by the one or more processor, the one or more parameters from at least a user preference information (Minskoff: paragraph 371) and the identifying information related to the vaporizable material (Minskoff: device recognizes contents of cartridge, paragraph 238 line 5-7), the user preference information comprising a use profile (Minskoff: user profiles generated based on user specific usage data, paragraph 379) associated with at least one of the identifying information related to the vaporizable material (Minskoff: device recognizes contents of cartridge, paragraph 238 line 5-7). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Juster to determine, by the one or more processor, the one or more parameters from at least a user preference information and the identifying information related to the vaporizable material, the user preference information comprising a use profile associated with at least one of the identifying information related to the vaporizable material as taught by Minskoff as this would help ensure that the device operates properly for the needs of a particular user and substance. In regards to claim 48, Juster in view of Tremblay, Todd, Minskoff, Hawes and Bellinger teaches the method of claim 20 and the combination further teaches wherein the one or more parameters includes a dosage limit (Minskoff: paragraph 238 line 5-8) associated with the dosage limit (Minksoff: paragraph 238 line 5-12 and paragraph 240 line 13-19 and paragraph 261 line 1-4). In regards to claim 49, Juster in view of Tremblay, Todd, Minskoff, Hawes and Bellinger teaches the method of claim 48 and the combination further teaches enabling operation of the vaporizer device for vaporizing of the vaporizable material; determining an estimated consumed dosage (Minskoff: paragraph 238 line 5-8 and 239 line 9-15); and in response to the estimated consumed dosage exceeding the dosage limit, at least partially disabling the vaporizer device to limit vaporization of the vaporizable material (Minskoff: paragraph 261 line 1-4). In regards to claim 50, Juster in view of Tremblay, Todd, Minskoff, Hawes and Bellinger teaches the method of claim 49 and the combination further teaches in response to the estimated consumed dosage meets or exceeds the dosage limit, generating of a user notification that the dosage limit has been reached (Minskoff: device has ability to calculate dosage per inhalation, paragraph 238 line 5-8, device has capability to deliver alerts or notifications concerning number of inhalations taken, paragraph 300). In regards to claim 46, Juster in view of Tremblay, Todd, Minskoff, Chan, Hawes and Bellinger teaches the method of claim 20. Juster does not disclose wherein the one or more parameters include one or more preferred temperatures for heating the vaporizable material over a vaporization session. However, Hawes teaches wherein the one or more parameters include one or more preferred temperatures for heating the vaporizable material over a vaporization session (heater or vaping profile allows controller to adjust power supplied to the heater at different points in the vaporization session, paragraph 95-99 and 107). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Juster such that the one or more parameters include one or more preferred temperatures for heating the vaporizable material over a vaporization session as taught by Hawes as this would allow the device to adapt the applied temperature to suit the preference of the user. In regards to claim 47, Juster in view of Tremblay, Todd, Minskoff, Hawes and Bellinger teaches the method of claim 46 and the combination further teaches wherein the use profile comprises a first preferred temperature during a first puff count, wherein the use profile further comprises a second preferred temperature during a second puff count subsequent to the first puff count, and wherein the second temperature is different from the first temperature, the second puff count subsequent to the first puff count (individual puff strength may be used as feedback to adjust heating, paragraph 98, controller may store heating profiles which may be adjusted to suit user preference, paragraph 99). In regards to claim 53, Juster in view of Tremblay, Todd, Minskoff, Hawes and Bellinger teaches the method of claim 20 and the combination further discloses wherein the usage information includes a temperature setting applied during the operation of the vaporizer device (Hawes: operating parameters, paragraph 75 line 6-8, operating parameters include heating profiles, paragraph 99 line 6-7). In regards to claim 54, Juster in view of Tremblay, Todd, Minskoff, Hawes and Bellinger teaches the method of claim 20 and the combination further discloses wherein the usage information includes a second quantity of the vaporizable material consumed during the operation of the vaporizer device, and wherein the first quantity of the vaporizable material remaining in the vaporizer cartridge is determined based at least on the second quantity of the vaporizable material consumed during the operation of the vaporizer device (level of vapor precursor tracked, paragraph 75 line 12-14). Claim 51 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Juster (US 2016/0143361) in view of Tremblay (US 2015/0181945), Todd (US 2012/0304990), Cameron (US 2019/0104762), Minskoff (US 2016/0021930), Hawes (US 2016/0360789) and Bellinger (US 2015/0359263). In regards to claim 51, Juster discloses a vaporizer device (battery section 72) configured to receive a vaporizer cartridge (replaceable cartridge 70), the vaporizer cartridge comprising a vaporizable material (cartridge section 70 comprises reservoir 345 with pre-vapor formulation, paragraph 66 line 2-4), the vaporizer device (second section 72) comprising: a power source (power source 1, paragraph 79 line 5-6) configured to provide power to a heater (heater 14) for vaporization of the vaporizable material (paragraph 80 and paragraph 77); a controller (operating system processing circuitry 200, paragraph 79 line 5-7). The embodiment of Figures 1 and 2 of Juster does not disclose wherein the vaporizer cartridge comprises a cartridge identifier, the vaporizer device comprises a wireless communication interface, the controller in communication with the wireless communication interface and the power source, the controller configured to: receive a first data associated with the cartridge identifier, the first data indicative of at least an age restriction associated with the vaporizable material; in response to receiving of the first data: at least partially disable the vaporizer device to limit the vaporization of the vaporizable material, and trigger, at a communication device communicatively coupled with the vaporizer device via the wireless communication interface, a display of a request for an age verification of a user of the vaporizer device; in response to the communication device performing the age verification, receive, from the communication device via the wireless communication interface, a second data corresponding the user identification; determine a stored user profile corresponding to the user identification and determine that the stored profile includes security settings associated with the first data; authenticate the user identification by performing an age analysis in which an age of the user is determined based on a comparison of registered user identification information in the stored profile and the first data, and determining that the age of the user satisfies a minimum age requirement associated with the first data; and in response to receiving of the second data, enable an operation of the vaporizer device for vaporization of the vaporizable material. However, the embodiment of Figures 3 and 4 of Juster teaches wherein a vaporizer cartridge (reservoir 345) comprises a cartridge identifier (reservoir 345, paragraph 66 line 2, which contains reservoir memory 410, paragraph 99 line 5-8 which may contain information about the contents of the container 420 such as the substance type, paragraph 100 line 10-13), a vaporizer device comprising a wireless communication interface (operating system processing circuitry 200, paragraph 79 line 5-7, see Annotated Fig 4, which contains host interface 370, paragraph 88 line 4-7, which provides communication between device and external computing device via wireless means, paragraph 90 line 16-19 and paragraph 96 line 11-14); the controller in communication with the wireless communication interface (memory 320 of operating system processing circuitry 200, paragraph 88 line 4-7, memory 320 communicates through host interface, paragraph 90 line 15-19) and the power source (operating system processing circuitry 200 contains processor 310, paragraph 88 line 4-5, operation of battery may be managed by processor 310, paragraph 95 line 1-3 and 10-13), the controller configured to: receive a first data associated with the cartridge identifier (paragraph 93); and requires age verification prior to allowing operation of device (paragraph 111 line 36-40), the vaporizer device configured for data communication with the communication device via the wireless communication interface (communication between device and external computing device may be wireless, paragraph 90 line 16-19 and paragraph 96 line 11-14); receive second data corresponding to an authenticated user identification associated with age information that meets or exceeds the age restriction from the communication device via the wireless communication interface (paragraph 111 line 32-35 and 48-54). Therefore it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the first embodiment of Juster such that the vaporizer cartridge comprises a cartridge identifier, the vaporizer device comprises a wireless communication interface, the controller in communication with the wireless communication interface and the power source, the controller configured to: receive a first data associated with the cartridge identifier; based at least on the receiving of the first data: cause at least partial disablement of the vaporizer device to limit vaporization of the vaporizable material; and requires age verification prior to allowing operation of the device, the vaporizer device configured for data communication with the communication device via the wireless communication interface; receive second data corresponding to an authenticated user identification associated with age information that meets or exceeds the age restriction from the communication device via the wireless communication interface; and based at least on the receiving of the second data, enable operation of the vaporizer device for vaporization of the vaporizable material as taught by the second embodiment of Juster as this configuration would allow the vaporizer device to reliably ensure that the user of the device meets the legal and/or regulatory standards with regard to the device and the material within it (paragraph 111 line 35-42). Juster does not disclose the first data indicative of at least an age restriction associated with the vaporizable material, at least a partially disabling of the vaporizer device to limit vaporization of the vaporizable material, triggering a display of a request for an age verification of a user or wherein said request for user age verification is caused by receiving of the first data associated with the cartridge identifier, performing age verification by calculating, based on facial features, an estimated age of the user, and determining that the estimated age of the user exceeds a minimum age requirement associated with the vaporizable material, or wherein in response to receiving of the second data, enable operation of the vaporizer device for vaporization of the vaporizable material, and writing to the cartridge identifier, receive a third data indicating a nominal resistance of the heater, verify, based at least on the nominal resistance of the heater and a resistance of the heater measured by a resistance measurement circuit in the vaporizer device, an operational status of the resistance measurement circuit, upon verifying the operational status of the resistance circuit, the vaporizer device operating based on at least one temperature-related parameter determined based on the resistance of the heater measured by the resistance measurement circuit, a fourth data associated with the operation of the vaporizer device, the fourth data including a usage information corresponding to a first quantity of the vaporizable material removed from the vaporizer cartridge during the operation of the vaporizer device. However, Cameron teaches the first data indicative of at least an age restriction associated with the vaporizable material (paragraph 170, claim 6-7). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Juster such that the first data is indicative of at least an age restriction associated with the vaporizable material as taught by Cameron as this would alert the user to the minimum age requirements for use of the device to ensure a potential user is aware of the requirements. Further, Tremblay teaches triggering a display of a request for user age verification (paragraph 168) and in response to the receiving authenticated user identification, enable operation of the vaporizer device for the vaporization of the vaporizable substance (device enables vapor providing capability when authorization information received, paragraph 160 line 7-11). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Juster to trigger a request for age verification of the user and based at least on the receiving authenticated user identification, enable operation of the vaporizer device for the vaporization of the vaporizable substance as taught by Tremblay as this would provide a clear method for which to provide the user with instructions and to ensure the vaporizer receives the necessary information to confirm user identity by matching received information against previously collected information (paragraph 162 line 1-5) to prevent unauthorized use. Further, Todd teaches based at least on the receiving of the first data (medical dose cartridge has data recognition means for the purpose of verifying use and user, paragraph 111 line 15-18): at least partially disabling the vaporizer device to limit vaporization of the vaporizable material (device capable of locking the device under multiple conditions after cartridge identified by device, claim 48-53); and cause a request for user verification (method comprises step wherein system verifies authorized use of dosage form by user, paragraph 23, 25, 38, 42, 48, verification of authorized user follows identification of the cartridge, claim 48, 49 and 51). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Juster such that based at least on the receiving of the first data associated with the cartridge identifier, causing presenting a request for user identification as taught by Todd as this would ensure that not only the vaporizer device but also the vaporizable material contained within the reservoir is used properly by the correct individuals. While Juster discloses age verification (paragraph 111 line 36-40) and profile data associated with the user (paragraph 29 and claim 22), it does not disclose determining a stored user profile corresponding to the user identification and determining that the stored user profile includes security settings associated with the first data, and authenticating user identification by performing age analysis in which an age of the user is determined based on a comparison of registered user identification information in the stored user profile and the first data and determining that the age of the user satisfies a minimum age requirement. However, Minskoff teaches an electronic vaporizer with the capability of determining a stored user profile corresponding to the user identification and determining that the stored user profile includes security settings associated with the first data, and authenticating user identification by performing age analysis in which an age of the user is determined based on a comparison of registered user identification information in the stored user profile and the first data and determining that the age of the user satisfies a minimum age requirement (paragraph 405 line 1-6). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Juster such that determining a stored user profile corresponding to the user identification and determining that the stored user profile includes security settings associated with the first data, and authenticating user identification by performing age analysis in which an age of the user is determined based on a comparison of registered user identification information in the stored user profile and the first data and determining that the age of the user satisfies a minimum age requirement as taught by Minskoff as this would allow the device to accurately determine an appropriate user of the device to prevent improper usage of the device. Additionally, Hawes teaches writing to the cartridge identifier (pod system 2200 includes CC-NVM 2205 which comprises non-volatile memory 2205b, paragraph 112 and 113, memory 2205b may record information from the controller 2105, paragraph 119), a third data associated with the operation of the vaporizer device, the third data including a usage information corresponding to a first quantity of the vaporizable material removed from the vaporizer cartridge during the operation of the vaporizer device (level of vapor precursor tracked, paragraph 75 line 12-14). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Juster to write to the cartridge identifier a third data associated with the operation of the vaporizer device, the third data including a usage information corresponding to a first quantity of the vaporizable material removed from the vaporizer cartridge during the operation of the vaporizer device as taught by Hawes as this would allow the cartridge to retain operational data between uses (Hawes: paragraph 6 line 11-13). Further still, Bellinger teaches receiving, at the one or more processors, a third data associated with the cartridge identifier on the vaporizer cartridge, the third data including a nominal resistance of a heater of the cartridge, verifying, based at least on the nominal resistance of the heater and a resistance of the heater measured by a resistance measurement circuit in the vaporizer device, an operational status of the resistance measurement circuit (device receives information regarding manufacturers specification for heater resistance as well as a measured resistance of the heater on activation which are used to establish operational parameters of the heater, paragraph 39), upon verifying the operational status of the resistance measurement circuit, the one or more parameters including at least one temperature- related parameter determined based on the resistance of the heater measured by the resistance measurement circuit in the vaporizer device (paragraph 34). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Juster receiving, at the one or more processors, a third data associated with the cartridge identifier on the vaporizer cartridge, the third data including a nominal resistance of a heater of the cartridge, verifying, based at least on the nominal resistance of the heater and a resistance of the heater measured by a resistance measurement circuit in the vaporizer device, an operational status of the resistance measurement circuit and, upon verifying the operational status of the resistance measurement circuit, the one or more parameters including at least one temperature- related parameter determined based on the resistance of the heater measured by the resistance measurement circuit in the vaporizer device as taught by Bellinger as this would allow the device to provide a precise heating based on the status of the heater throughout usage of the device. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments concerning the independent claims are not persuasive. Applicant argues that the combination fails to teach the specific methodology of the user authentication process whereby an age restriction of a vaporizable material is stored in the cartridge and an age of a user is verified by calling data stored in a user profile and the age restriction is compared to the age of the user to determine if the user may operate the device. Examiner disagrees. The combined references as seen above provide teaching of age verification, of cartridges containing age restrictions, of determining if a prospective user is of an appropriate age to operate the device. Applicant also argues that their intended invention also includes age related restrictions with respect to particular users. While Examiner would read this as being covered by the concept of “User A is determined to be not old enough to be provided with Substance X” as is seen in the above references, it should be noted that this particular wordage does not appear in the claims. If Applicant deems this concept to be significant, Applicant is invited to elaborate on their intended invention and amend the claims to incorporate such intent. Arguments concerning the dependent claims are in regards to their dependency on above argued independent claims and are therefore addressed said arguments. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Arielle Wolff whose telephone number is (571)272-8727. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8:00-4:00. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kendra Carter can be reached on (571) 272-9034. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ARIELLE WOLFF/ Examiner, Art Unit 3785 /KENDRA D CARTER/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3785
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 25, 2017
Application Filed
Nov 06, 2017
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 02, 2020
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 15, 2020
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 15, 2020
Applicant Interview
Jul 01, 2020
Response Filed
Aug 31, 2020
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 29, 2020
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 30, 2020
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 12, 2021
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 21, 2021
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jun 21, 2021
Examiner Interview Summary
Jun 22, 2021
Response Filed
Jul 09, 2021
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 12, 2021
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 24, 2021
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 21, 2021
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 21, 2021
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 23, 2021
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 02, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 07, 2022
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 10, 2022
Response Filed
Sep 08, 2022
Final Rejection — §103
Mar 14, 2023
Notice of Allowance
Jul 14, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 21, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 19, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 19, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 19, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 20, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 20, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 24, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 25, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 28, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Dec 30, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 03, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12569388
Adjustable table and related methods
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564536
Detachable pneumatic therapeutic apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12558287
Compression Device Especially for Preventing Deep Vein Thrombosis
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12533480
PATIENT INTERFACE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12533219
WATERWAY CONTROL DEVICE AND ORAL IRRIGATOR HANDLE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

9-10
Expected OA Rounds
47%
Grant Probability
79%
With Interview (+32.0%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 173 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month