Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 15/678,703

Method and Device for Securing Suture to an Anchor Body of a Suture Anchor

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Aug 16, 2017
Examiner
TON, MARTIN TRUYEN
Art Unit
3771
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Conmed Corporation
OA Round
17 (Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
18-19
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allow Rate
319 granted / 521 resolved
-8.8% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+34.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
569
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
48.0%
+8.0% vs TC avg
§102
26.7%
-13.3% vs TC avg
§112
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 521 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION The following Office Action is in response to the Request for Reconsideration filed on November 17, 2025. Claims 1, 5-9, 11, 14-17, and 19-20 are currently pending Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Concerning the “Drawing Objections and Rejections under 35 U.S.C. § 103” section on pages 6-7 of the Applicant’s Response filed on November 17, the applicant’s arguments have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicant argues that U.S. Patent Publication No. 2012/0290004, which was incorporated by reference, shows a soft suture anchor in which one filament end passes through an eyelet aperture of the opposing filament end, and two ends are subsequently tied to form a sliding cinch knot that prevents further filament motion, referencing paragraphs [0040-0044]. However, the examiner asserts that the referenced paragraphs make absolutely no mention of an eyelet. The word “eyelet” does not appear anywhere within the Lombardo reference. Furthermore, the referenced paragraphs do not mention any structure that is similar to an eyelet and the drawings do not show any structures that may be interpreted as an eyelet. Only a slip knot is disclosed. Because the applicant has not referenced any specific reference numbers within the Drawings and has not provided any specific passages within the referenced paragraphs which may relate to the claimed laterally positioned hole in the second working end, the examiner cannot determine what structure the applicant is referring to as an “eyelet”. Therefore, the rejections of the claims under 35 U.S.C. §103 and the objections to the drawings stand. Drawings The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in the claims. Therefore, “the knot formed with the first working end and the second working end” as claimed in claims 1 and 11 must be shown or the feature(s) canceled from the claim(s). No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1, 5-9, 11, 14-17, and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 11 have added the limitation of “wherein a knot is formed with the first working end and the second working end” and claim 14 has added the limitation of “forming a knot with the first working end and the second working end”, but there is no support for a suture anchor device including both a laterally positioned hole through the body of the filament and a knot. The applicant cites paragraphs [0023] and [0024] as support for the limitation of the knot formed with the first working end and the second working end, but said paragraphs are referring to the suture anchor of U.S. Patent No. 2012/0290004, which is described in the preceding paragraph [0022]. In fact, paragraphs [0023] and [0024] are direct recitations of paragraphs [¶ 0042-0043] of U.S. Patent No. 2012/0290004. Furthermore, U.S. Patent No. 2012/0290004 includes slip knots that are included in the suture anchor, which is an equivalent structure to the laterally positioned hole of the instant application. There is no evidence or support within the Specification that shows a knot included with the laterally positioned hole structure. There is no description of the two structures being used with one another, how the two structures may be used together, what benefit to the device may be imparted in including both structures, and there is no drawing that shows a knot included in the suture anchor device, therein failing to reasonably convey to a person having ordinary skill in the art that the inventor had possession of the claimed invention at the time the application was filed. Dependent claims 5-9, 15-17, and 19-20 are further rejected for being dependent on claims that contain new matter. Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARTIN TRUYEN TON whose telephone number is (571)270-5122. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday; EST 10:00 AM - 6:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Darwin Erezo can be reached at 571-272-4695. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MARTIN T TON/Examiner, Art Unit 3771 11/26/2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 16, 2017
Application Filed
May 28, 2019
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Sep 04, 2019
Response Filed
Dec 30, 2019
Final Rejection — §112
Mar 23, 2020
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 25, 2020
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 27, 2020
Final Rejection — §112
Apr 09, 2020
Response after Non-Final Action
May 26, 2020
Interview Requested
Jul 02, 2020
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 08, 2020
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 04, 2021
Non-Final Rejection — §112
May 10, 2021
Response Filed
Aug 27, 2021
Final Rejection — §112
Dec 03, 2021
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 05, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 03, 2022
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 04, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 17, 2022
Non-Final Rejection — §112
May 24, 2022
Response Filed
Jul 28, 2022
Final Rejection — §112
Oct 05, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 18, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 03, 2022
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 09, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 08, 2022
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Mar 14, 2023
Response Filed
Mar 30, 2023
Final Rejection — §112
Jul 05, 2023
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 12, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 28, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Oct 31, 2023
Response Filed
Nov 17, 2023
Final Rejection — §112
Feb 21, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 27, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 18, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jul 24, 2024
Response Filed
Aug 01, 2024
Final Rejection — §112
Nov 08, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 13, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 27, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Mar 03, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 21, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Jun 26, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 30, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Nov 17, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 26, 2025
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599399
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROVIDING ACTIVE TISSUE SITE DEBRIDEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588990
DELIVERY APPARATUS FOR A PROSTHETIC HEART VALVE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12569691
ATRIAL APPENDAGE OCCLUSION AND ARRHYTHMIA TRATMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12564456
MODULAR COLPOTOMY CUP COMPONENT FOR ROBOTICALLY CONTROLLED UTERINE MANIPULATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12558185
GUIDING AND POSITIONING DEVICE FOR ASSISTING IN COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY-GUIDED NEEDLE BIOPSY (CT-GNB)
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

18-19
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+34.2%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 521 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month