Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 16/022,571

Glow in the dark dartboard, darts, tips, shafts, flights and the manufacturing of same

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 28, 2018
Priority
Jun 29, 2017 — provisional 62/604,253 +1 more
Examiner
KLAYMAN, AMIR ARIE
Art Unit
3711
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Glo Dartboards LLC
OA Round
6 (Non-Final)
35%
Grant Probability
At Risk
6-7
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
63%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 35% of cases
35%
Career Allowance Rate
335 granted / 960 resolved
-35.1% vs TC avg
Strong +28% interview lift
Without
With
+27.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
37 currently pending
Career history
1000
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.9%
-39.1% vs TC avg
§103
84.6%
+44.6% vs TC avg
§102
4.5%
-35.5% vs TC avg
§112
6.3%
-33.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 960 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 3/16/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 42 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hollinger et al US 2017/0307341 (“Hollinger”) in view of Kim US 2012/0248702 (“Kim”) Iimura Keiji JP2006117857A (“Iimura Keiji”), and Konz et al US 8,707,612 (“Konz”). As per claim 42, Hollinger discloses a dartboard gaming system (system 100)(at least Figs. 1-4B; paragraphs [0032], [0035]-[0040] and [0042]) comprising: a sisal, hemp, or paper circular dartboard evenly divided into a plurality of sections (dartboard 108)(Figs. 1 and 2, regarding the circular board divided into sections (regions 204A-204F; [0121] as the dartboard made of sisal and/or paper); a plurality of numbers, one each, positioned at each of the plurality of sections (Fig. 3B in conjunction to Fig. 2 and [0042] regarding scoring indicia); at least one dart that (darts 110; e.g., 110A and/or 110B)(Fig. 1; [0032]); and a case (enclosure 106)(Fig. 1; [0032]) comprising: at least one close-able door (Fig. 1) , an interior (Fig. 1), and lighting mounted within the interior (such as lighting 432 within dartboard 108, which is positioned within enclosure 106)(Figs. 4B and [0061] regarding lights 432 in conjunction to Fig. 1, regarding enclosure 106), the case providing storage for the dartboard and the at least one dart in the interior (Fig. 1). Hollinger is not specific regarding a phosphorescent solution soaked into the sisal, hemp, or paper circular dartboard, the phosphorescent solution comprising a clear carrier medium and a phosphorescent color adapted to have phosphorescent or fluorescent properties, thereby causing the dartboard to glow in low light conditions; the at least one dart that glows in low light conditions; and such that the lighting mounted in the interior charges when the case is closed so that both the dartboard and the at least one dart glow in the dark. With respect to the dartboard and the dart including phosphorescent color adapted to have phosphorescent or fluorescent properties, in a similar field of dartboard systems, Kim discloses dartboard 20 and drat pin 10 having phosphorescent color adapted to have phosphorescent or fluorescent properties (Figs. 2 and 3; [0058]-[0079]). Therefore, the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to form Hollinger’s dartboard, with a phosphorescent color adapted to have phosphorescent or fluorescent properties, thereby causing the dartboard to glow in low light conditions and the at least one dart that glows in low light conditions for the reason that a skilled artisan would have been motivated by Kim’s suggestions that such means provide enhance display of the dartboard and dart in darker places (e.g., [0011] ”to provide a luminous dart board set, which enables a player to easily see a position of a magnetic dart pin stuck into a dart board and a printed matter printed on the dart board with the naked eyes even in a dark place when the player throws the magnetic dart pin at the dart board”). Kim is not specific regarding the phosphorescent means is a phosphorescent solution comprising a clear carrier medium. However, Iimura Keiji discloses a phosphorescent means that is solution soaked into the sisal, hemp, or paper circular dartboard, the phosphorescent solution comprising a clear carrier medium (Figs. 1 and 2; page 10, 5th+ par; note in particular paragraph 5 “two types of phosphorescent phosphor particles (phosphorescent pigments) 10 and 11 are mixed in clear paints such as acrylic resin, acrylic urethane resin, and melamine resin that are transparent to their excitation light and afterglow emission light, Disperse into a phosphorescent paint or phosphorescent ink containing two types of phosphorescent phosphor particles 10 and 11,”). Therefore, the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to form Hollinger- Kim’s phosphorescent is solution soaked into the sisal, hemp, or paper circular dartboard, the phosphorescent solution comprising a clear carrier medium for the reason that a skilled artisan would have been motivated by Iimura Keiji’s suggestions that such phosphorescent solution provides an enhance “glow in the dark properties” (e.g., page 5, 2nd par. “In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, it is possible to provide a phosphorescent light emitting device capable of extending the afterglow time of prior art phosphorescent materials called phosphorescent phosphors, afterglow phosphors, phosphorescent phosphors and the like.”). Such enhance “glow in the dark properties” would have been much desired within the phosphorescent/glow in the dark target of Hollinger -Kim. With respect to the lighting means as charging the phosphorescent dartboard and dart, in the field of enclosures suitable for storage and support, Konz discloses lighting means (light source 16) of enclosure (box 10) configure to energized phosphorescent stored means (Fig.; 1:58-2:51). Therefore, the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains to form the modified Hollinger’s lighting means such that the lighting mounted in the interior charges when the case is closed so that both the dartboard and the at least one dart glow in the dark for the reason that a skilled artisan would have been motivated by Konz’s suggestions to use box for storing phosphorescent means that is configure to charge the stored phosphorescent means in convenient and efficient charging manner (1:39-43). Such convenient and efficient charging manner is much desired within the modified Hollinger having dartboard, with a phosphorescent color adapted to have phosphorescent or fluorescent properties, thereby causing the dartboard to glow in low light conditions and the at least one dart that glows in low light conditions (taught by Kim) positioned within the enclosure with the lighting source (e.g., Hollinger’s Figs. 1 and 4B). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 42 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference or combination thereof applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AMIR ARIE KLAYMAN whose telephone number is (571)270-7131. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday; 7:00 AM-4:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicholas Weiss can be reached at 571-270-1775. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /A.A.K/Examiner, Art Unit 3711 6/3/2026 /JOHN E SIMMS JR/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3711
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 8 earlier events
Feb 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 21, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 01, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 09, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 17, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 16, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 07, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678679
Basketball Practice Device and Method
3y 6m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12658068
MOTION PLATFORM
4y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12649093
FLEXIBLE PICKLEBALL PADDLE AND FRAME THEREOF
1y 0m to grant Granted Jun 09, 2026
Patent 12636559
Portable Basketball Goal System with Removable Rebound Assembly
3y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629576
EQUIPMENT FOR PLAYING BASKETBALL
4y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

6-7
Expected OA Rounds
35%
Grant Probability
63%
With Interview (+27.7%)
2y 11m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 960 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month