Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 16/102,475

METHODS AND COMPOSITIONS FOR RESISTANCE TO CYST NEMATODE IN PLANTS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Aug 13, 2018
Examiner
ZHENG, LI
Art Unit
1662
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation
OA Round
9 (Non-Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
9-10
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
1055 granted / 1260 resolved
+23.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +13% lift
Without
With
+13.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1290
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.0%
-37.0% vs TC avg
§103
15.2%
-24.8% vs TC avg
§102
21.6%
-18.4% vs TC avg
§112
49.7%
+9.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1260 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 1. A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 2/2/2026 has been entered. Applicant's amendment to claim 33 in the reply filed on 12/1/2025 is acknowledged and entered. As a result, claim 1-23 and 34-38 are withdrawn from consideration for being drawn to non-elected invention. Claims 24, 26-27, 29-33 and SEQ ID NO: 9 and 18 are examined on the merits. 2. The rejections and objections not recited in this action are withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. 3. Claim 33 remains rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. A review of the full content of the specification indicates that obtaining nucleotide sequences encoding a modified NSF that that has an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:18 having one or a plurality of amino acid modification compared to SEQ ID NO:17 and has modification of R4Q/N21Y wherein the modified NSF is a growth promoting and survival variant is essential to the operation of the claimed invention. The specification also teaches soybean gene of SEQ ID NO:9 encoding a NSF protein comprising SEQ ID NO:18 having both R4Q and N21Y modification. The specification further teaches homologous sequence listed in Table 6 majority of which is over 90% identical to SEQ ID NO:18. The Federal Circuit has recently clarified the application of the written description requirement. The court stated that a written description of an invention “requires a precise definition, such as by structure, formula, [or] chemical name, of the claimed subject matter sufficient to distinguish it from other materials.” (See University of California v. Eli Lilly and Co., 119 F.3d 1559, 1568; 43 USPQ2d 1398, 1406 (Fed. Cir. 1997)). The court also concluded that “naming a type of material generally known to exist, in the absence of knowledge as to what that material consists of, is not a description of that material.” Id. Further, the court held that to adequately describe a claimed genus, Patent Owner must describe a representative number of the species of the claimed genus, and that one of skill in the art should be able to “visualize or recognize the identity of the members of the genus.” Id. However, neither the specification nor the prior art discloses any polypeptide that is at least about 90% identical to SEQ ID NO: 18 except for SEQ ID NO: 18 itself having both R4Q and N21Y modifications. Furthermore, since SEQ ID NO:18 contains both R4Q and N21Y modifications, there is no evidence that a single modification would be sufficient for the modified NSF to be functioning as a growth promoting and survival variant. Therefore, given the breadth of the claims and the lack of further guidance, a person skilled in the art would conclude that applicant is not in possession of the claimed invention. Applicants traverse in the paper filed 12/1/2025. Applicants’ arguments have been fully considered but were not found persuasive. Applicants argue that claim 33 has been amended to recite that the modified NSF polypeptide has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:18, where amino acid positions 4 and 21 are modified (response, page 17). The Office contends that the amended claim only recites that the modified NSF polypeptide has an amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:18 (emphasis added), which reads on any fragment of SEQ ID NO:18 with any size. To overcome the rejection, it is suggested to amend the claim to recite the modified NSF polypeptide has the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO:18. Conclusion Claims 24, 26-27, 29 are allowed and claim 33 is rejected. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LI ZHENG whose telephone number is (571)272-8031. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday (9-5). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, BRATISLAV STANKOVIC can be reached on 571-270-0305. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LI ZHENG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1662
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 13, 2018
Application Filed
Jul 16, 2020
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jan 19, 2021
Response Filed
May 04, 2021
Final Rejection — §112
Oct 05, 2021
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 06, 2021
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 29, 2021
Non-Final Rejection — §112
May 02, 2022
Response Filed
May 02, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 11, 2022
Response Filed
Jan 11, 2023
Final Rejection — §112
Jul 19, 2023
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 27, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 15, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Feb 21, 2024
Response Filed
May 16, 2024
Final Rejection — §112
Nov 21, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 30, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 13, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jun 20, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 31, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Dec 01, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 02, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 03, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12588628
SOYBEAN CULTIVAR 22121100
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588638
SOYBEAN CULTIVAR 20320703
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588639
SOYBEAN CULTIVAR 25101703
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582060
CANOLA INBRED 4PPQP40A
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12577624
TRANSGENIC CORN EVENT ZM_BCS216090 AND METHODS FOR DETECTION AND USES THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

9-10
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+13.2%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1260 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month