Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 13, 2026
Application No. 16/179,643

SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR PERFORMING DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURES FOR A VOLUME CLAMP FINGER CUFF

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 02, 2018
Priority
Dec 04, 2017 — provisional 62/594,111
Examiner
ROZANSKI, GRACE NMN
Art Unit
3791
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Becton, Dickinson and Company
OA Round
8 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
8-9
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
75%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allowance Rate
50 granted / 82 resolved
-9.0% vs TC avg
Moderate +14% lift
Without
With
+13.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 1m
Avg Prosecution
29 currently pending
Career history
127
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
§103
56.9%
+16.9% vs TC avg
§102
8.0%
-32.0% vs TC avg
§112
14.5%
-25.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 82 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
Detailed Action Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after allowance or after an Office action under Ex Parte Quayle, 25 USPQ 74, 453 O.G. 213 (Comm'r Pat. 1935). Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, prosecution in this application has been reopened pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on March 27, 2026 has been entered. Information Disclosure Statement The information disclosure statements (IDS) submitted on 03/27/26, 0626/24, 06/29/22, 03/18/19, and 01/23/19 have been considered by the examiner. Amendment Entered In response to the amendment filed on March 27, 2026, amended claims 1 and 11 have been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 2, 5, 6, 8-12, 15, 16 and 18-22 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The term “predetermined percentage” in claims 1, 5, 6, 8, 11, 15, 16, 18, 21 and 22 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “predetermined percentage” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Examiner notes that the claim does not give examples of said predetermined percentage. The term “more tightly” in claims 5 and 15 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “more tightly” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Examiner notes it is unclear how much tighter the finger cuff is to be reapplied. The term “loosen” in claims 8 and 18 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “loosen” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Examiner notes it is unclear how much looser the finger cuff is to be reapplied. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GRACE L ROZANSKI whose telephone number is (571)272-7067. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30am-5pm, alt F 8:30am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Alexander Valvis can be reached on (571)272-4233. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GRACE L ROZANSKI/Examiner, Art Unit 3791 /ALEX M VALVIS/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3791
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 21 earlier events
Aug 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Oct 14, 2025
Interview Requested
Oct 22, 2025
Interview Requested
Nov 04, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 27, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 22, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jul 27, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12667286
ANALYTE SENSORS FEATURING WORKING ELECTRODE ASPERITY PLANING FOR DECREASING INTERFERENT SIGNAL
5y 0m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12635912
Method for Reducing Measurement Interference of Micro Biosensor
5y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12599318
IMPLANTABLE MICRO-BIOSENSOR AND METHOD FOR OPERATING THE SAME
5y 8m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594010
MINIMALLY INVASIVE SKIN PATCH, METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SAME, AND BLOOD GLUCOSE MEASURING APPARATUS USING SAME
4y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12588843
SENSOR WITH SUBSTRATE INCLUDING INTEGRATED ELECTRICAL AND CHEMICAL COMPONENTS AND METHODS FOR FABRICATING THE SAME
6y 11m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

8-9
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
75%
With Interview (+13.7%)
4y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 82 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month