Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 16/469,420

Cylindrical Battery Comprising Anti-corrosive Gasket

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Jun 13, 2019
Examiner
ROLDAN RAMOS, CHRISTIAN
Art Unit
1723
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
LG Chem, Ltd.
OA Round
6 (Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
7-8
OA Rounds
3y 6m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allow Rate
218 granted / 316 resolved
+4.0% vs TC avg
Strong +17% interview lift
Without
With
+16.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
346
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
56.7%
+16.7% vs TC avg
§102
14.1%
-25.9% vs TC avg
§112
23.1%
-16.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 316 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims Claims 1, 3-8 and 14 were rejected in the Office Action from 11/06/2025 Applicant filed a response, amended claims 1 and 7, and added claim 15. Claims 2, 13 and 15 were previously cancelled. Claims 1, 3-12, 14 and 16 are currently pending in the application, of claims 9-12 are withdrawn from consideration. Claims 1, 3-8, 14 and 16 are being examined on the merits in this Office Action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1, 3-5, 7-8 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. (KR 20140066336) and further, in view of Marple et al. (U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/0026293) and Miura et al. (U.S. Patent Application Publication 2015/0207113). Yoshizawa (U.S. Patent 6,132,900) and Lee et al. (U.S. Patent Application Publication 2016/0099439) are provided as additional evidence. Regarding claim 1, 3-4 and 14, Kim teaches an anti-corrosion-treated cylindrical battery (i.e., rustproof washer for a secondary battery and a secondary battery including the same) (abstract), comprising: an electrode assembly (300) (i.e., power generation device) comprising a positive electrode, a negative electrode, and a separator mounted therein (page 2) (see figure below); a cylindrical can (200) (i.e., can) having an open upper end (i.e., secondary battery includes a can, a cap assembly coupled to an upper opening of the can); (page 2) a cap assembly (400) coupled to the cylindrical can (page 2) via a crimping unit (i.e., beading portion) (page 5) located at an outer circumferential surface of an upper part of the cylindrical can (as shown in figure 3 below), the crimping unit including a portion of the open upper end having a bent shape extending radially inwards (as shown in figure 3 below); and an anti-corrosive gasket (500) (i.e., rustproof washer) extending between and contacting the cylindrical can (200) and the cap assembly (400) (as shown in figure 3) (page 5) (Note: the upper cap 410 is part of the cap assembly 400 therefore, it reads on the claimed limitation), a portion of the anti-corrosive gasket being exposed to an external environment outside of the cylindrical can and the cap assembly (as shown in figure 3 below and figure 4), wherein the anti-corrosive gasket (500) comprises a volatile corrosion inhibitor and a base resin (page 2), the volatile corrosion inhibitor comprising a polymer resin and a sodium-nitrate-based material (i.e., a polymer resin and NaNO2 or NaNO3) (page 3), the sodium-nitrate- based material being dispersed throughout the anti-corrosive gasket (i.e., NaNO2 and NaNo3 may be mixed with the polymer resin to obtain a vapor-proof rustproofing agent. This is mixed with the base resin, extruded and then rubbed in a washer-like shape to produce a rust-proof washer) (page 3). Kim teaches a weight the volatile corrosion inhibitor is 1 to 30 percent of a weight of the base resin (page 3), a weight percent of the sodium-nitrate-based material is 3 to 30 percent of a weight of the polymer resin (page 3), and the sodium-nitrate-based material is at least one of NaNO2 and NaNo3, the sodium-nitrate- based material being dispersed throughout the anti-corrosive gasket (i.e., NaNO2 and NaNo3 may be mixed with the polymer resin to obtain a vapor-proof rustproofing agent. This is mixed with the base resin, extruded and then rubbed in a washer-like shape to produce a rust-proof washer) (page 3). Kim teaches both the polymer resin and the base resin can include one selected from the group consisting of polypropylene, polybutylene terephthalate, polyethylene, Teflon, polytetrafluoroethylene, rayon, polybiscose and polynosic or a mixture of two or more thereof (page 3). As such, one of ordinary skill in the art could have consider selecting the polymer resin and the base resin to be identical having polypropylene or being different as one or a mixture of the components above can be selected for both, the polymer resin and the base resin. PNG media_image1.png 526 783 media_image1.png Greyscale Kim does not teach the specifics of the anti-corrosive gasket located at an inside of the crimping unit surrounded by the crimping unit. Marple, also directed to a battery (i.e., electrochemical cell), teaches a battery (110) (see figure 1 below) (paragraph [0039]) having a crimping unit (114) (i.e., cell closure) (see figure 1) (paragraph [0042]) where a cylindrical can (112) (i.e., container) and a cap assembly (115) (i.e., terminal cover) is coupled (see figure 1) (paragraph [0042]), and an anti-corrosive gasket (116) (paragraph [0042], [0045]) located inside the crimping unit and surrounded by the crimping unit (see figure 1). Marple teaches the gasket prevent corrosion and inhibit leakage of electrolyte through and around the components in the crimping unit (114) (paragraph [0045]). Kim provides the guidance that an anti-corrosion gasket can be placed between the cylindrical can and the cap assembly to prevent corrosion of the cap assembly (page 2). Marple teaches the anti-corrosive gasket located at an inside of the crimping unit surrounded by the crimping unit, providing anti corrosion properties and preventing leakage around and between components. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Kim and include a gasket inside the crimping unit and surrounded by the crimping unit as suggested by Marple in order to further prevent corrosion and inhibit leakage of electrolyte through and around or between the components of the crimping unit. PNG media_image2.png 717 646 media_image2.png Greyscale Kim does not explicitly articulate the specifics of the anti-corrosive gasket is configured to prevent corrosion in the crimping unit in high-temperature and high-humidity conditions for an extended period of time. However, since Kim, as modified by Marple teaches identical materials for the anti-corrosive gasket as the one claimed, it would be reasonable to expect the same properties and characteristics to include stability or prevent the occurrence of corrosion in high-temperature and high-humidity conditions for an extended time. Nonetheless, Kim recognizes an improvement is required in the crimping unit to address the problem of corrosion in high temperature and high humidity atmosphere and such is addressed with a volatile corrosion inhibitor (VCI) (page 1). As such, one of ordinary skill in the art would understand that adding a VCI to the gasket in the location as claimed (which Marple suggests) would also increase prevention of corrosion in high-temperature and high-humidity conditions. Nonetheless, additional guidance is provided below. Miura, directed to a non-aqueous secondary battery (abstract), teaches gasket that includes polymer resins such as polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate and polybutylene terephthalate (paragraph [0072]). Miura teaches the gasket provides high compression ratio and prevents volatilization of electrolytic solution as well as intrusion of moisture inside the battery and such increase battery stability under high-temperature environment. As evidenced by Miura, a gasket with similar composition as Kim, can provide stability under high-temperature conditions. Therefore, one of ordinary skill in the art would understand that the gasket of Kim would also exhibit the same characteristics. Provided as additional evidence, Yoshizawa, also directed to a battery (abstract) teaches an anti-corrosive gasket (4) located inside a crimping unit and surrounded by the crimping unit (abstract) (see figure 1) between a cylindrical can (1) (i.e., cell container) and cap assembly (see figure 1 below) (C3, L30-67). Yoshizawa teaches the gasket is coated with an anti-corrosion agent (C8, L1-10) suggesting it provides protection against corrosion. As such it is clear that the area where the gasket is located (see figure below) including the crimping unit and the cap assembly is corrosion resistant. Kim provides the guidance that an anti-corrosion gasket can be placed between the cylindrical can and the cap assembly to prevent corrosion of the cap assembly (page 2). Yoshizawa teaches a gasket inside and surrounded by the crimping unit that is corrosion resistant. It would therefore be obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the battery of Kim to include an anti-corrosion gasket located inside of the crimping unit and surrounded by the cramping unit as taught by Yoshizawa to predictably improve resistance against corrosion in that particular area. In addition, if it was known that a material provides protection against corrosion and it was observed that an area not protected against corrosion is corroded, it would be obvious to a skilled artisan to use the material to further provide corrosion resistance in that particular area. For instance, provided as additional evidence, Lee teaches a battery can (i.e., corrosion resistant tube) (paragraph [0008]) that includes a volatile corrosion inhibitor (VIC) and a base resin (paragraph [0017]) which provides an excellent corrosion inhibiting property capable of enhancing safety of the battery and prevent occurrence of corrosion in the outer surface of the can (paragraph [0018]). All the references recognize the need of components with anti-corrosive properties where they can be used between the cylindrical can and cap assembly (Kim), inside the crimping and surrounded by the crimping unit (Marple) (Yoshiwaza) or in the can (Lee). As such, one of ordinary skill in the art could have consider having any of the components of the battery to be treated or to include a corrosion inhibitor (i.e., VCI) in order to decrease occurrence of corrosion in the entire battery or a particular area or component. PNG media_image3.png 726 543 media_image3.png Greyscale Regarding claim 5, Kim teaches the sodium-nitrate-based material is dispersed throughout the anti-corrosive gasket in a crystalline state (i.e., NaNO2 and NaNo3 can be dispersed in crystals in a rust-proof washer) (page 4), and a region of gamma-iron (III) oxide (7-Fe2O3) having a thickness ranging from 10A to 1000 A is disposed at an end of the crimping unit of the cylindrical can (page 4). Regarding claim 7, Kim teaches the cap assembly comprises a top cap (i.e., upper cap) sealing the open end of the cylindrical can, the top cap contacting a protruding portion of the gasket (as shown in figure 3) (page 5); a positive temperature coefficient (PTC) element (i.e., PTC device) contacting the top cap (page 5); and a safety vent, one surface of which contacts the PTC element and a portion of another surface of which contacts the gasket (as shown in figure 3) (page 5). Regarding claim 8, Kim teaches the battery further comprising a current interrupt device (i.e., current blocking member) welded to a lower end of the safety vent (as shown in figure 3), a lower part of the current interrupt device being connected to the electrode assembly (i.e., lower end of the safety vent is connected to the positive electrode of the power generation device through the current blocking member and the positive electrode lead) (page 5). Claims 6 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. (KR 20140066336) and further, in view of Marple et al. (U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/0026293) and Miura et al. (U.S. Patent Application Publication 2015/0207113) as applied to claim 1 above, and further in view of Lee et al. (KR 20160043724). Regarding claim 6, Kim teaches the cap assembly comprises a top cap (i.e., upper cap) sealing the open end of the cylindrical can (as shown in figure 3) (page 5); and a safety vent electrically connected to the electrode assembly (page 5). Kim does not explicitly teach the safety vent one surface of which contacts a side surface, an upper surface, and a lower surface of the top cap and another surface of which is has a bent shape and contacts an inner circumferential surface of the gasket. Lee, also directed to a battery (abstract), teaches a battery having a cap assembly and a gasket (abstract), the cap assembly including a top cap (page 6) and a safety vent (page 6). Further, Lee teaches one surface of the safety vent contacts a side surface, an upper surface, and a lower surface of the top cap (i.e., wraps around the top cap) (page 4) and another surface of which is has a bent shape and contacts an inner circumferential surface of the gasket (as shown in figure 4 below) (page 4). Lee teaches such configuration provides a connection between the safety vent and the cap assembly (page 4). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the battery of Kim to include a safety vent with the configuration of Lee in order to provide a connection between the safety vent and the cap assembly. PNG media_image4.png 469 542 media_image4.png Greyscale Claims 15 is are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al. (KR 20140066336) and further, in view of Marple et al. (U.S. Patent Application Publication 2008/0026293), Miura et al. (U.S. Patent Application Publication 2015/0207113) and Lee et al. (U.S. Patent Application Publication 2013/0273401). Yoshizawa (U.S. Patent 6,132,900) and Lee et al. (U.S. Patent Application Publication 2016/0099439) are provided as additional evidence. Regarding claim 15, Kim teaches an anti-corrosion-treated cylindrical battery (i.e., rustproof washer for a secondary battery and a secondary battery including the same) (abstract), comprising: an electrode assembly (300) (i.e., power generation device) comprising a positive electrode, a negative electrode, and a separator mounted therein (page 2) (see figure below); a cylindrical can (200) (i.e., can) having an open upper end (i.e., secondary battery includes a can, a cap assembly coupled to an upper opening of the can); (page 2) a cap assembly (400) coupled to the cylindrical can (page 2) via a crimping unit (i.e., beading portion) (page 5) located at an outer circumferential surface of an upper part of the cylindrical can (as shown in figure 3 below), the crimping unit including a portion of the open upper end having a bent shape extending radially inwards (as shown in figure 3 below), the cap assembly comprising a top cap assembly comprising a top cap (i.e., cap 410) sealing the open upper end of the cylindrical can (page 5) (see figure 3) and a positive temperature coefficient (PTC) element (i.e., PTC device) contacting the top cap (page 5); and an anti-corrosive gasket (500) (i.e., rustproof washer) extending between and contacting the cylindrical can (200) and the cap assembly (400) (as shown in figure 3) (page 5) (Note: the upper cap 410 is part of the cap assembly 400 therefore, it reads on the claimed limitation), a portion of the anti-corrosive gasket being exposed to an external environment outside of the cylindrical can and the cap assembly (as shown in figure 3 below and figure 4), wherein the anti-corrosive gasket (500) comprises a volatile corrosion inhibitor and a base resin (page 2), the volatile corrosion inhibitor comprising a polymer resin and a sodium-nitrate-based material (i.e., a polymer resin and NaNO2 or NaNO3) (page 3), the sodium-nitrate- based material being dispersed throughout the anti-corrosive gasket (i.e., NaNO2 and NaNo3 may be mixed with the polymer resin to obtain a vapor-proof rustproofing agent. This is mixed with the base resin, extruded and then rubbed in a washer-like shape to produce a rust-proof washer) (page 3). Kim teaches a weight the volatile corrosion inhibitor is 1 to 30 percent of a weight of the base resin (page 3), a weight percent of the sodium-nitrate-based material is 3 to 30 percent of a weight of the polymer resin (page 3), and the sodium-nitrate-based material is at least one of NaNO2 and NaNo3, the sodium-nitrate- based material being dispersed throughout the anti-corrosive gasket (i.e., NaNO2 and NaNo3 may be mixed with the polymer resin to obtain a vapor-proof rustproofing agent. This is mixed with the base resin, extruded and then rubbed in a washer-like shape to produce a rust-proof washer) (page 3). Kim teaches both the polymer resin and the base resin can include one selected from the group consisting of polypropylene, polybutylene terephthalate, polyethylene, Teflon, polytetrafluoroethylene, rayon, polybiscose and polynosic or a mixture of two or more thereof (page 3). As such, one of ordinary skill in the art could have consider selecting the polymer resin and the base resin to be identical having polypropylene or being different as one or a mixture of the components above can be selected for both, the polymer resin and the base resin. PNG media_image1.png 526 783 media_image1.png Greyscale Kim does not teach a thickness of the PTC element ranging from 0.2 to 0.4 mm, and a thickness of the portion of the top cap that contacts the PTC element ranging from 0.3 to 0.5 mm. Lee, also directed to a cylindrical battery (abstract), teaches the battery having a cap assembly (30) with a top cap (32) and PTC (34) (paragraph [0097]). Further, Lee teaches PTC having a thickness of 0.2 to 0.4mm (paragraph [0078]) and the top cap having a thickness of 0.3-0.5 mm (paragraph [0079]). Lee teaches if the thickness of the PTC is too thick, the inner resistance thereof rises and the size of the battery increases, so the capacity may be reduced an if the thickness is too thin, desired current-interrupting effect is difficult to obtained at a high temperature and the PTC device may break even by external impact (paragraph [0078]). Moreover, Lee teaches if the thickness of the top cap is too thin, a desired mechanical hardness is difficult to be obtained and if the thickness is too thick, the size and weigh increase, so the capacity of the battery may be reduced (paragraph [0079]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Kim to have the thickness of the PTC and top cap in the range as disclosed by Lee in order to optimize battery capacity and desire current-interrupting effect. Kim does not teach the specifics of the anti-corrosive gasket located at an inside of the crimping unit surrounded by the crimping unit. Marple, also directed to a battery (i.e., electrochemical cell), teaches a battery (110) (see figure 1 below) (paragraph [0039]) having a crimping unit (114) (i.e., cell closure) (see figure 1) (paragraph [0042]) where a cylindrical can (112) (i.e., container) and a cap assembly (115) (i.e., terminal cover) is coupled (see figure 1) (paragraph [0042]), and an anti-corrosive gasket (116) (paragraph [0042], [0045]) located inside the crimping unit and surrounded by the crimping unit (see figure 1). Marple teaches the gasket prevent corrosion and inhibit leakage of electrolyte through and around the components in the crimping unit (114) (paragraph [0045]). Kim provides the guidance that an anti-corrosion gasket can be placed between the cylindrical can and the cap assembly to prevent corrosion of the cap assembly (page 2). Marple teaches the anti-corrosive gasket located at an inside of the crimping unit surrounded by the crimping unit, providing anti corrosion properties and preventing leakage around and between components. Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify Kim and include a gasket inside the crimping unit and surrounded by the crimping unit as suggested by Marple in order to further prevent corrosion and inhibit leakage of electrolyte through and around or between the components of the crimping unit. PNG media_image5.png 802 722 media_image5.png Greyscale Kim does not explicitly articulate the specifics of the anti-corrosive gasket is configured to prevent corrosion in the crimping unit in high-temperature and high-humidity conditions for an extended period of time. However, since Kim, as modified by Marple teaches identical materials for the anti-corrosive gasket as the one claimed, it would be reasonable to expect the same properties and characteristics to include stability or prevent the occurrence of corrosion in high-temperature and high-humidity conditions for an extended time. Nonetheless, Kim recognizes an improvement is required in the crimping unit to address the problem of corrosion in high temperature and high humidity atmosphere and such is addressed with a volatile corrosion inhibitor (VCI) (page 1). As such, one of ordinary skill in the art would understand that adding a VCI to the gasket in the location as claimed (which Marple suggests) would also increase prevention of corrosion in high-temperature and high-humidity conditions. Nonetheless, additional guidance is provided below. Miura, directed to a non-aqueous secondary battery (abstract), teaches gasket that includes polymer resins such as polypropylene, polyethylene terephthalate and polybutylene terephthalate (paragraph [0072]). Miura teaches the gasket provides high compression ratio and prevents volatilization of electrolytic solution as well as intrusion of moisture inside the battery and such increase battery stability under high-temperature environment. As evidenced by Miura, a gasket with similar composition as Kim, can provide stability under high-temperature conditions. Therefore, one of ordinary skill in the art would understand that the gasket of Kim would also exhibit the same characteristics. Provided as additional evidence, Yoshizawa, also directed to a battery (abstract) teaches an anti-corrosive gasket (4) located inside a crimping unit and surrounded by the crimping unit (abstract) (see figure 1) between a cylindrical can (1) (i.e., cell container) and cap assembly (see figure 1 below) (C3, L30-67). Yoshizawa teaches the gasket is coated with an anti-corrosion agent (C8, L1-10) suggesting it provides protection against corrosion. As such it is clear that the area where the gasket is located (see figure below) including the crimping unit and the cap assembly is corrosion resistant. Kim provides the guidance that an anti-corrosion gasket can be placed between the cylindrical can and the cap assembly to prevent corrosion of the cap assembly (page 2). Yoshizawa teaches a gasket inside and surrounded by the crimping unit that is corrosion resistant. It would therefore be obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the battery of Kim to include an anti-corrosion gasket located inside of the crimping unit and surrounded by the cramping unit as taught by Yoshizawa to predictably improve resistance against corrosion in that particular area. In addition, if it was known that a material provides protection against corrosion and it was observed that an area not protected against corrosion is corroded, it would be obvious to a skilled artisan to use the material to further provide corrosion resistance in that particular area. For instance, provided as additional evidence, Lee teaches a battery can (i.e., corrosion resistant tube) (paragraph [0008]) that includes a volatile corrosion inhibitor (VIC) and a base resin (paragraph [0017]) which provides an excellent corrosion inhibiting property capable of enhancing safety of the battery and prevent occurrence of corrosion in the outer surface of the can (paragraph [0018]). All the references recognize the need of components with anti-corrosive properties where they can be used between the cylindrical can and cap assembly (Kim), inside the crimping and surrounded by the crimping unit (Marple) (Yoshiwaza) or in the can (Lee). As such, one of ordinary skill in the art could have consider having any of the components of the battery to be treated or to include a corrosion inhibitor (i.e., VCI) in order to decrease occurrence of corrosion in the entire battery or a particular area or component. PNG media_image3.png 726 543 media_image3.png Greyscale Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments filed 02/04/2026 have been fully considered. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Lee. Applicant further argues that the gasket of Kim is not exposed to external environment. Examiner respectfully disagree. The anti-corrosion washer, which as indicated has been interpreted as the gasket, is in fact exposed to an external environment of the battery. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTIAN ROLDAN whose telephone number is (571)272-5098. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 9:00 am - 7:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, TONG GUO can be reached at 571-272-3066. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTIAN ROLDAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1723
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 13, 2019
Application Filed
Apr 06, 2021
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 09, 2021
Response Filed
Oct 01, 2021
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 12, 2022
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 12, 2022
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 31, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 04, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 07, 2022
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 09, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 27, 2022
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 10, 2023
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 10, 2023
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 03, 2023
Response Filed
Jul 01, 2023
Final Rejection — §103
Oct 10, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 10, 2023
Notice of Allowance
Nov 16, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 26, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 01, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
May 14, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 22, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 25, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 26, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 26, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 22, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 04, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 20, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 20, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 04, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 23, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603361
Pouch Type Battery Case and Pouch Type Secondary Battery
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603311
METAL FUEL FLOW BATTERY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12586816
ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES WITH POLYMER ELECTROLYTES AND FILLERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12586806
Bipolar Plate, Cell Frame, Battery Cell, Cell Stack, and Redox Flow Battery
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12580213
FUEL CELL SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+16.7%)
3y 6m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 316 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month