Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026
Application No. 16/539,989

PERFORMING MATRIX OPERATIONS IN NEURAL NETWORKS

Final Rejection §101§112
Filed
Aug 13, 2019
Examiner
KANG, INSUN
Art Unit
2193
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
NVIDIA Corporation
OA Round
10 (Final)
79%
Grant Probability
Favorable
11-12
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 79% — above average
79%
Career Allowance Rate
532 granted / 677 resolved
+23.6% vs TC avg
Strong +40% interview lift
Without
With
+39.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
12 currently pending
Career history
695
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
16.8%
-23.2% vs TC avg
§103
36.9%
-3.1% vs TC avg
§102
20.2%
-19.8% vs TC avg
§112
19.0%
-21.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 677 resolved cases

Office Action

§101 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This action is responding to the amendment filed on 6/17/2026. Claims 1-36 are pending in the application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Per claims 1, 7, 14, 22, and 28, it is unclear how the corresponding sub-operation is related to the matrix operations. Interpretation: a corresponding sub-operation of the plurality of mutually exclusive sub-operations. Per claims 2-6, 8-13, 15-21, 23-27 and 29-36, these claims are rejected because they depend on claims 1, 7, 14, 22, and 28 respectively. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, filed on 6/17/2026 for the rejections under 101 with respect to claims 1-36 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection under 35 U.S.C. 101 has been withdrawn. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-36 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance over prior arts: While Yu teaches performing neural network inference convolution calculations, acquiring a structure and parameters of a neural network; generating a directed acyclic graph of instructions for performing neural network computation according to types and dependency relationships based on the structure of the neural network; topologically sorting the directed acyclic graph to obtain instructions having a specific order; and generating binary instruction codes having the specific order for performing neural network computation by the computing system for performing high parallelism calculations, Espig teaches fast Fourier transform configuration and computation instructions with a matrix operations circuit including a two-dimensional grid, Redfern teaches a matrix multiplication accelerator in convolutional neural networks, executing the configured fundamental computational primitive, US 10884734 teaches acceleration of a matrix multiply accumulate operation and data loading, US 20150193233 teaches a compiler that improves performance by generating a set of interleaved operation wherein registers are loaded into an adder's input operand registers while a multiplication operation is in progress, ultimately the prior arts of record, taken alone or in combination, do not teach the subject matter recited in the claims: detect, in source code, structural information of one or more matrix operations and generate executable code to perform the one or more matrix operations based at least in part on the structural information, wherein the generated executable code comprises a plurality of mutually exclusive sub-operations of the one or more matrix operations, the plurality of mutually exclusive sub-operations interleaved with one or more data fetches to cause data for a corresponding sub-operation to be retrieved by one or more data fetch circuits. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. US 20150193233 teaches a compiler that improves performance by generating a set of interleaved operation. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to INSUN KANG whose telephone number is (571)272-3724. The examiner can normally be reached M-TR 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chat Do can be reached at 571-272-3721. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /INSUN KANG/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2193
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 34 earlier events
Sep 17, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 18, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 23, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101, §112
Feb 20, 2026
Interview Requested
Jun 17, 2026
Response Filed
Oct 05, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §101, §112
Oct 06, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12769530
METHOD FOR INTEGRATING AN AUTOMATION TECHNOLOGY FIELD DEVICE IN A DISTRIBUTED LEDGER
3y 8m to grant Granted Oct 20, 2026
Patent 12748589
METHOD, SYSTEM AND PROCESSOR FOR ENHANCING ROBUSTNESS OF SOURCE-CODE CLASSIFICATION MODEL
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 29, 2026
Patent 12737203
METHOD OF OPTIMIZING EXECUTION OF RPA BOT
2y 10m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12717554
UNIVERSAL DEVELOPER ENVIRONMENT FOR DEVELOPING AND MANAGING INTEGRATIONS FOR API PLATFORMS
3y 3m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12717573
Mobile application cloning
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

11-12
Expected OA Rounds
79%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+39.6%)
3y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 677 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month