Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 16/605,925

COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR TREATING PAIN DISORDERS

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Oct 17, 2019
Examiner
POLIAKOVA-GEORGAN, EKATERINA
Art Unit
1637
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
unknown
OA Round
12 (Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
13-14
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allow Rate
434 granted / 668 resolved
+5.0% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+16.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
55 currently pending
Career history
723
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
5.4%
-34.6% vs TC avg
§103
28.6%
-11.4% vs TC avg
§102
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
§112
24.2%
-15.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 668 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 17-20 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Sah et al (US 2007/0105806, May 2007, cited from IDS) and in further view of Tzabazis et al (Laboratory Investigations, 2007, vol.106, 1196-1203, cited from IDS), Kovacevic et al (US 2012/0294797, November 2012, of record) and GenBank X02330.1 (GenBank, 2016, pages 1-3, of record). Sah et al teach methods of treating pain in subjects by administering dsRNA (see paragraph [0025]). Such dsRNA can be administered with the reporter gene (see paragraph [0318]) and dsRNA is a gene expression modifier, because it blocks gene expression (see paragraph [0015]). Disease to treat can be fibromyalgia (see paragraph [0150]) and other pain - related disorders (see paragraph [0152]), therefore inherently including complex regional pain syndrome. dsRNA can be delivered in a vector under polymerase Il control (see paragraph [0315]). Sah et al further teach designing dsRNAs targeting specific protein based on the protein mRNA sequence, such dsRNAs comprising two sequences complementary to each other (see paragraphs [0018-0019, 0049, 0056-0057]). Sah et al do not teach gene expression modifiers comprising any of SEQ ID NOs: 15-30. Tzabazis et al teach that antisense inhibition of CGRP reduces sensitivity to pain and can be used for pain treatment (see Abstract). Kovacevich et al teach that anti-CGRP antibodies can be administered for treatment of fibromyalgia and complex regional pain syndrome (see paragraphs [0314-0315]). GenBank X02330.1 provides mRNA sequence of CGRP (see page 3), comprising sequences complementary to at least instant SEQ ID NOs: 15-17. It would have been obvious to one of the ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to treat pain disorders such as fibromyalgia and complex regional pain syndrome by administering vectors comprising dsRNAs, gene expression modifiers, targeting CGRP to a subject based on teachings of Sah et al, Tzabazis et al, Kovacevich et al and GenBank X02330.1. One of the ordinary skill in the art would be motivated to do so, because Tzabazis et al and Kovacevich et al teach that inhibition of CGRP can be used to treat pain disorders such as fibromyalgia and complex regional pain syndrome. Further one of the ordinary skill in the art can design dsRNAs as inhibitors of CGRP based on teachings of Sah et al and GenBank X02330.1, arriving at instant SEQ ID NOs: 15-17, and deliver them as vectors taught by Sah et al. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 02/04/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Concerning 103 rejection Applicant argues that none of the references teach any of instant SEQ ID NOs: 15-30. In response the references make obvious at least instant SEQ ID NOs: 15-17, which are complementary to mRNA sequence of CGRP. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to EKATERINA POLIAKOVA whose telephone number is (571)270-5257. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 8-5. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Dunston can be reached at (571)272-2916. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /EKATERINA POLIAKOVA-GEORGANTAS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1637
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 17, 2019
Application Filed
Jan 25, 2022
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 28, 2022
Response Filed
Jun 02, 2022
Final Rejection — §103
Aug 05, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 07, 2022
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 08, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 27, 2022
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 03, 2023
Response Filed
Feb 17, 2023
Final Rejection — §103
Apr 21, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
May 23, 2023
Request for Continued Examination
May 30, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 29, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 05, 2023
Response Filed
Oct 20, 2023
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 19, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 25, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 05, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
May 03, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 06, 2024
Response Filed
Sep 06, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
Nov 04, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 06, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 09, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 06, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 16, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Aug 18, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 18, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 22, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 31, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Feb 04, 2026
Response Filed
Feb 20, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600964
Compound for treatment of heart failure
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595477
COMPLEMENT FACTOR B-MODULATING COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12584130
ANGIOTENSINOGEN (AGT) iRNA COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576030
COMPOSITIONS FOR DELIVERY OF CODON-OPTIMIZED MRNA
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12570977
NOVEL MRNA COMPOSITION AND PRODUCTION METHOD FOR USE IN ANTI-VIRAL AND ANTI-CANCER VACCINES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

13-14
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+16.2%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 668 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month