Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 16/620,275

T CELLS EXPRESSING A CHIMERIC ANTIGEN RECEPTOR

Final Rejection §112§DP
Filed
Dec 06, 2019
Examiner
NICKOL, GARY B
Art Unit
1643
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Region Of Southern Denmark
OA Round
6 (Final)
32%
Grant Probability
At Risk
7-8
OA Rounds
4y 0m
To Grant
51%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 32% of cases
32%
Career Allow Rate
15 granted / 47 resolved
-28.1% vs TC avg
Strong +19% interview lift
Without
With
+18.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 0m
Avg Prosecution
35 currently pending
Career history
82
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.2%
-36.8% vs TC avg
§103
22.9%
-17.1% vs TC avg
§102
19.7%
-20.3% vs TC avg
§112
34.3%
-5.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 47 resolved cases

Office Action

§112 §DP
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The Amendment filed 02/13/2026 in response to the non-final rejection of 11/17/2025 is acknowledged and has been entered. Claims 1, 23-24, 30-35, 66-70 were amended or previously presented. Claims 5-6 were cancelled. Claims 1, 23-24, 30-35, 66-70 are currently under consideration. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office Action. Rejections Maintained Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Claims 23-24 remain rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends for the reasons of record in the action mailed 11/17/2025, paragraph 7. Applicants argue (Remarks 02/13/26, page 1) that amendments to Claim 23 and 24 now limit the scope of claim 1. Claim 23 has been amended to recite that the amino acid sequence having at least 90% identity to the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 4 comprises the complementarity determining region 1 (CDR1), CDR2, and CDR3 of an anti-CD79b variable light chain comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 4. Applicants further argue that claim 24 has been amended to recite that the amino acid sequence having at least 90% identity to the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 6 comprises the CDR1, CDR2, and CD3 of an anti-CD79b variable heavy chain comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO: 6. These arguments have been considered but are not persuasive. Independent claim 1 comprises the amino acid of SEQ ID NO:4 and the amino acid of SEQ ID NO:6. The amendments only add language that is already present in Claim 1, yet both of claims 23 and 24 still retain “at least 90%” identity to SEQ ID NO:4. Thus, claims 23-24 do not limit the scope of Claim 1. Claims 1, 23-24, 30-35 remain rejected and new claims 66-70 remain rejected under the grounds of nonstatutory double patenting as being unpatentable over claims 1, 27-31, and 34-38 of copending application (now allowed but not issued) 17/312744 for the reasons of record and for the reasons set forth below. Applicants argue (Remarks, page 2) that claim 1 has been amended to recite that the variable heavy chain of the CD79b-binding domain is N-terminal to the variable light chain of the CD79b-binding domain rendering them non obvious over co-pending application 17/312744. This argument has been considered but is not found persuasive. The species of VH to VL scFv arrangement necessarily anticipates the genus of the co-pending application. Those of ordinary skill in the art readily understand that this is a very common arrangement in that scFv domains can be linked in either way (VH to VL, or VL to VH and still retain antigen binding function). This works because the linking domains (typically G4Sx3 linker) are long and flexible and allow proper assembly of the VH and VL to form the antigen recognition pocket in either orientation. New Rejections Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 23-24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claims 23-24 now recite “an amino acid sequence having at least 90% identity” to SEQ ID NO:4 or SEQ ID NO:6 and comprises the amino acid of SEQ ID NO:4 or 6. This is indefinite because the claims cannot both comprise all of the amino acids of SEQ ID NO:4 (or 6) and have at least 90% identity. For example, according to the as filed sequence listing, SEQ ID NO:4 is 112 amino acids long. Thus, according to claim 23 the structure must contain all 112 amino acids (including CDRs 1-3) while simultaneously being permitted to contain less than (at least 90%) 112 amino acids. Conclusion No claim is allowed. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to GARY B NICKOL, Ph.D. whose telephone number is (571)272-0835. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9AM-5:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Julie Wu can be reached at 571-272-5205. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /GARY B NICKOL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1643
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 06, 2019
Application Filed
Mar 07, 2022
Non-Final Rejection — §112, §DP
Sep 12, 2022
Response Filed
Oct 31, 2022
Final Rejection — §112, §DP
May 03, 2023
Notice of Allowance
Dec 04, 2023
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 07, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 02, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112, §DP
Jul 08, 2024
Response Filed
Aug 28, 2024
Final Rejection — §112, §DP
Mar 03, 2025
Notice of Allowance
Oct 02, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 07, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112, §DP
Feb 13, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 24, 2026
Final Rejection — §112, §DP (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599620
METHOD FOR THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC FATIGUE SYNDROME USING AN INHIBITORY OR CYTOTOXIC AGENT AGAINST PLASMA CELLS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12577286
T CELL RECEPTORS WHICH RECOGNIZE MUTATED EGFR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12534538
ANTI-HER2 BINDING MOLECULES
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12492251
HUMAN BLOOD-BRAIN BARRIER TARGETING ANTIBODIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 09, 2025
Patent 11827670
ANTI-CfaE ANTIBODIES AND METHODS OF USE
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 28, 2023
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
32%
Grant Probability
51%
With Interview (+18.9%)
4y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 47 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month