Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026
Application No. 16/630,168

ORGANIC COMPOUND AND ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT ELEMENT INCLUDING SAME

Non-Final OA §102§112
Filed
Jan 10, 2020
Priority
Jul 13, 2017 — RE 10-2017-0089032 +1 more
Examiner
YANG, JAY LEE
Art Unit
1786
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Doosan Solus Co. Ltd.
OA Round
11 (Non-Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
11-12
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
76%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allowance Rate
676 granted / 915 resolved
+8.9% vs TC avg
Minimal +2% lift
Without
With
+2.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
983
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
53.8%
+13.8% vs TC avg
§102
18.5%
-21.5% vs TC avg
§112
23.3%
-16.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 915 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 06/12/26 has been entered. Response to Amendment The rejection of Claims 1, 3, 4, and 8-10 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Choi et al. (US 2018/0040834 A1) as set forth in the Final Rejection filed 03/12/26 is overcome by the Applicant’s amendments. The rejection of Claims 1, 3, 4, 6, and 8-10 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Choi et al. 2 (US 2018/0093962 A1) as set forth in the Final Rejection filed 03/12/26 is overcome by the Applicant’s amendments. The rejection of Claim 7 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Choi et al. 2 (US 2018/0093962 A1) as set forth in the Final Rejection filed 03/12/26 is overcome by the Applicant’s amendments. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. The claim, which is dependent on Claim 1, recites compounds which are not encompassed by any one of Chemical Formulae 3 and 5-8. Notice that R12 must be a substituent represented by Chemical Formula 10 or Chemical Formula 11. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3, 4, 6, and 8-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Lee et al. (US 2015/0144938 A1). Lee et al. discloses the following compound: PNG media_image1.png 324 422 media_image1.png Greyscale (page 46) such that X1 = O, X2-3 = C1 alkyl group (methyl), R1-2 = R5-8 = hydrogen, L1 = carbazolylene, L2 = single bond, and R12 = Applicant’s Chemical Formula 11 (with X4 = N(R21) (with R21 = C6 aryl group (phenyl)) and Y4-7 = C(R16) (with R16 = hydrogen))) of Applicant’s Chemical Formula 6. Lee et al. further discloses an organic electroluminescent (EL) element comprising a pair of electrodes, interposed therein the following layers: hole-injecting layer, hole-transporting layer, light-emitting layer, hole-blocking layer, electron-transporting layer, and electron-injecting layer; its inventive compounds comprise any one of such organic layers, such as the hole-injecting layer, hole-transporting layer, and light-emitting layer ([0052]-[0057]). Response to Arguments 11. Applicant’s arguments on pages 20-23 with respect to the deficiencies of the previously cited prior art have been considered but are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection as set forth above. Conclusion 12. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAY L YANG whose telephone number is (571)270-1137. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri, 6am-3pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer A Boyd can be reached at 571-272-7783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAY YANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 21 earlier events
Sep 02, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Sep 03, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Jan 08, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 12, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112
Jun 12, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 15, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12703716
ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT MATERIALS AND DEVICES
4y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12679857
ORGANIC METAL COMPOUND, ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DIODE AND ORGANIC LIGHT EMITTING DEVICE HAVING THE COMPOUND
4y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12674092
ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND, ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME, AND DIAGNOSTIC COMPOSITION INCLUDING THE ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND
4y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12677593
NITROGEN-CONTAINING FUSED HETEROCYCLIC COMPOUND AND APPLICATIONS THEREOF
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12666863
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
7y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

11-12
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
76%
With Interview (+2.2%)
3y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 915 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month