Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 16/647,047

AN ALL-IN-ONE INTEGRATED, INTER-CONVERTIBLE FOLD-ABLE CELL PHONE, TABLET AND PERSONAL COMPUTER

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 13, 2020
Examiner
CARVALHO JR., ARMINDO
Art Unit
1729
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH - OF THE COMMONWEALTH SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION
OA Round
7 (Non-Final)
48%
Grant Probability
Moderate
7-8
OA Rounds
3y 8m
To Grant
85%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 48% of resolved cases
48%
Career Allow Rate
80 granted / 168 resolved
-17.4% vs TC avg
Strong +37% interview lift
Without
With
+37.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
68 currently pending
Career history
236
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
64.9%
+24.9% vs TC avg
§102
14.0%
-26.0% vs TC avg
§112
13.3%
-26.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 168 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on January 27, 2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment/Amendment In response to the amendment received January 27, 2026 : Claims 1-6, 11 and 13 are pending. Claims 7-10, 12 and 14 have been cancelled as per applicant’s request. The previous claim objections are withdrawn in light of the amendment. Applicant’s arguments, filed January 27, 2026 with respect to claims 1 and 13 have been fully considered and are persuasive in terms of the rejection under 35 U.S.C 103 in light of the amendments. The rejection under 35 U.S.C. 103 of October 28, 2025 has been withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-6, 11 and 13 rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Regarding Claim 1 and 13, the claims recite “…the structurally isomorphous lithium alloy has dendrite-free cycling for at least 200 cycles with specific capacities of “…at least 1600 mAg/h…”. There does not appear to be a written description of the claim limitation dendrite-free cycling with specific capacity of “…at least 1600 mAh/g…”. The instant specification provides that the crystallographic structure is shown to have stable dendrite-free cycling for over 200 cycles with outstanding capacities in excess of approximately 1630 mAh/g (pg. 8, lines 24-28). Neither the specification nor the drawings clearly support the claimed range of at least 1600 mAh/g and thus, the claimed range is considered new matter. Specifically there is no support for the lower bounds of dendrite-free cycling with specific capacity of “at least 1600 mAh/g”. Claims 2-6 and 11 are also rejected due to dependency on claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 1-6, 11 and 13 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) set forth in this Office action. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: none of the prior art of record alone or in combination, teach, suggestion or render obvious the invention of at least claims 1 and 13. Claims 1 teaches a size-adjustable all-in-one electronic device comprising the elements therein. Claim 13 teaches a method of preparing a size-adjustable all-in-one electronic device comprising the steps therein. Notably, both claims require a flexible composite, multilayer anode comprising a porous, lithium metal alloy foam, wherein the porous, lithium metal alloy foam is deposited on metal current collector comprising copper or stainless steel. Lee et al. (previously cited) teaches a size-adjustable all-in-one electronic device comprising a flexible anode (Para. [0271]). Kumta-Engineering (previously cited) discloses a porous metal alloy foam comprising a lithium metal (i.e. a Li anode) (page 1) (i.e. composite, multiplayer anode). However, none of the prior art teaches a flexible composite, multilayer anode comprising a porous, lithium metal alloy foam, wherein the porous, lithium metal alloy foam is deposited on metal current collector comprising copper or stainless steel as required by claims 1 and 13. There is no suggestion or motivation to arrive at the claimed invention of at least claims 1 and 13 in the prior art. Thus, none of the prior art alone or in combination teaches or renders obvious the claimed invention of claim 1 and 13 . Since claims 2-6 and 11 are dependent upon claim 1, they would be allowable for the same reason. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ARMINDO CARVALHO JR. whose telephone number is (571)272-5292. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 7:30a.m.-5p.m.. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Ula Ruddock can be reached at 571 272-1481. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ARMINDO CARVALHO JR./Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1729
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 13, 2020
Application Filed
Apr 21, 2022
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Sep 26, 2022
Response Filed
Jan 04, 2023
Final Rejection — §112
May 03, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 06, 2023
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 12, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 27, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Feb 05, 2024
Response Filed
Jun 11, 2024
Final Rejection — §112
Dec 16, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 17, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 07, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jul 14, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 14, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 15, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 24, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Jan 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 20, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12573659
MEMBRANES FOR ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12573609
LITHIUM METAL ANODE, FABRICATION METHOD THEREOF, AND LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY COMPRISING SAME ANODE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12567544
Separator for Electrochemical Device and Method for Manufacturing the Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12567590
NEGATIVE ELECTRODE CURRENT COLLECTOR, NEGATIVE ELECTRODE PLATE AND ELECTROCHEMICAL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12562319
Separator for Electrochemical Device and Method for Manufacturing the Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
48%
Grant Probability
85%
With Interview (+37.1%)
3y 8m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 168 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month