Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 16/650,696

METHODS OF ISOLATING T CELLS HAVING ANTIGENIC SPECIFICITY FOR A P53 CANCER-SPECIFIC MUTATION

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 25, 2020
Priority
Sep 29, 2017 — provisional 62/565,464 +1 more
Examiner
SABILA, MERCY HELLEN
Art Unit
1654
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
The United States of America, as represented by the Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services
OA Round
8 (Non-Final)
57%
Grant Probability
Moderate
8-9
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 57% of resolved cases
57%
Career Allowance Rate
154 granted / 270 resolved
-3.0% vs TC avg
Strong +46% interview lift
Without
With
+46.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
327
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.1%
-36.9% vs TC avg
§103
45.4%
+5.4% vs TC avg
§102
14.8%
-25.2% vs TC avg
§112
19.5%
-20.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 270 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority This application is a 371 of PCT/US2018/051280 filed 09/17/2018. PCT/US2018/051280 has PRO 62/565,464 filed 09/29/2017. Claim Status Claims 1-15, 18-21, and 23 are pending. Claims 7, 12-15, 18-21 are withdrawn. Claims 1-3 are amended. Claims 16-17, and 22 are canceled. Claims 1-6, 8-11, and 23 are being examined on the merits in this office action. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 - Withdrawn The rejection of claims 1-6, 8-11 and 23 under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, is withdrawn in view of the amendment to claim 1 to delete “no more than 25 amino acids in length. The rejection of claims 1-6, 8-11 and 23 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over WO 2016/053339 A1 (hereinafter “the ‘339 publication”, cited and enclosed in the previous office action) in view of Shamalov et al. (Oncoimmunology. 2017; 6(4): e1285990, cited and enclosed in the previous office action), and Fersht et al. (WO 2008017863A2 – hereinafter “Fersht - cited and enclosed in the previous office action) is withdrawn in view of the claim amendments and arguments that the mutated p53 sequence consists of amino acids sequence of SEQ ID Nos. 2-13, 508-512, 520-530, 534, 591, 596-602. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 - New The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-6, 8-11, and 23 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites “…each mutated p53 amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NOs: 2-13, 508-512, 520-530, 534, 591, or 596- 602…”. It is unclear if one or several of the mutants is being co-cultured. Additionally, it is unclear which mutated p53 needs to be presented and which p53 mutant encoded in the MHC. As a result, it is unclear which T-cells are being selected. Claim 2 has a similar issue reciting “…a pool of peptides comprising a different mutated p53 amino acid sequence”. It is unclear which peptide the mutated p53 amino acid sequence the claim is referencing. Claim 5 is indefinite since it is unclear if the genes encode any of the sequences in claim 1. Claim 10 recites several p53 mutants and is also indefinite. Regarding claims 4 and 23, it is unclear which p53 mutant the claim is referencing. Applicant can amend claim 1 to recite: “A method of isolating T cells having antigenic specificity for a mutated p53 amino acid sequence encoded by a cancer-specific p53 missense mutation, the method comprising: inducing autologous antigen presenting cells (APCs) of a patient with a tumor to present at least two mutated p53 amino acid sequences of any of SEQ ID NOs: 2-13, 508-512, 520-530, 534, 591, or 596- 602; co-culturing autologous T cells of the patient with the autologous APCs that present the mutated p53 amino acid sequences; and selecting the autologous T cells that (a) were co-cultured with the autologous APCs that present the mutated p53 amino acid sequences and (b) have antigenic specificity for the mutated p53 amino acid sequences presented in the context of a major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecule expressed by the patient to provide isolated T cells having antigenic specificity for the mutated p53 amino acid sequences encoded by the cancer- specific p53 missense mutation”. The dependent claims do not clear up the indefiniteness issue and are also rejected. Closest prior art The closest prior art is WO 2016/053339 A1. ‘339 teaches a method of isolating T cells having antigenic specificity for a mutated amino acid sequence encoded by a cancer-specific mutation, the method comprising: identifying one or more genes in the nucleic acid of a cancer cell of a patient, each gene containing a cancer-specific mutation that encodes a mutated amino acid sequence; inducing autologous antigen presenting cells (APCs) of the patient to present the mutated amino acid sequence; co-culturing autologous T cells of the patient with the autologous APCs that present the mutated amino acid sequence; and selecting the autologous T cells that (a) were co-cultured with the autologous APCs that present the mutated amino acid sequence and (b) have antigenic specificity for the mutated amino acid sequence presented in the context of a major histocompatability complex (MHC) molecule expressed by the patient to provide isolated T cells having antigenic specificity for the mutated amino acid sequence encoded by the cancer-specific mutation (claim 1). ‘339 does not teach wherein the mutated amino acid sequence is the mutated p53 amino acid sequence consisting of a sequence of SEQ ID NOs: 2-13, 508-512, 520-530, 534, 591, or 596- 602. Conclusion No claims are allowed. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Mercy H. Sabila whose telephone number is (571)272-2562. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday 5:00 am - 3:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Lianko G. Garyu can be reached at (571)270-7367. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MERCY H SABILA/Examiner, Art Unit 1654 /LIANKO G GARYU/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1654
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 16 earlier events
Jun 03, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 04, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Dec 03, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 04, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 05, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 22, 2026
Response Filed
Sep 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12697366
THERMOGENIC COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS
5y 0m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12662492
SITE-SPECIFIC ANTIBODY CONJUGATION AND ANTIBODY-DRUG CONJUGATE AS SPECIFIC EMBODIMENT THEREOF
5y 9m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12629410
MULTI-ANTIGENIC PEPTIDE MIMICS OF GONOCOCCAL LIPO-OLIGOSACCHARIDE (LOS) EPITOPES
4y 2m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12617831
PEPTIDE TARGETING GIP AND GLP-2 RECEPTORS FOR TREATING BONE DISORDERS
4y 8m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12618847
ACTIVITY-BASED PROBES WITH UNNATURAL AMINO ACIDS TO MONITOR PROTEASOME ACTIVITY
3y 8m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

8-9
Expected OA Rounds
57%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+46.4%)
2y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 270 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month