Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 16/670,286

ELECTRIC POWER AND DATA COMMUNICATIONS WITHIN A FUEL TANK AND ACROSS A WALL OF THE FUEL TANK USING RESISTIVE NON-METALLIC WIRE AND A SEALED ACTIVE CONNECTOR

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Oct 31, 2019
Examiner
OLAMIT, JUSTIN N
Art Unit
2853
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
The Boeing Company
OA Round
8 (Non-Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
8-9
OA Rounds
2y 9m
To Grant
71%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
494 granted / 793 resolved
-5.7% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 9m
Avg Prosecution
46 currently pending
Career history
839
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.5%
-38.5% vs TC avg
§103
48.7%
+8.7% vs TC avg
§102
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
§112
23.9%
-16.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 793 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Election/Restrictions This application contains claims directed to the following patentably distinct species: Species A, in which the internal data communications connection comprises a resistive non-metallic wire; and Species B, in which the internal data communications connection comprises an optical signal connection. The species are independent or distinct because claims to the different species recite mutually exclusive characteristics of such species. The mutually exclusive characteristics associated with each species are stated above. In addition, these species are not obvious variants of each other based on the current record. There is a search and/or examination burden for the patentably distinct species as set forth above because at least the following reason(s) apply: The species require a different field of search (e.g. searching different classes/subclasses or electronic resources, or employing different search queries); and/or the prior art applicable to one species would not likely be applicable to another species; and/or the species are likely to raise different non-prior art issues under 35 U.S.C. 101 and/or 35 U.S.C. 112, first paragraph. Amended claims 14-17 and 19 are directed to an invention that is independent or distinct from the invention originally claimed for the following reasons: Amended claim 14 is directed toward Species B. Previously examined claims 1, 14 and 20, which were examined in the Office Action dated 10/23/2025, were directed toward Species A. Since applicant has received an action on the merits for the originally presented invention of Species A, this invention of Species A has been constructively elected by original presentation for prosecution on the merits. Accordingly, claims 14-17 and 19 are withdrawn from consideration as being directed to a non-elected invention. See 37 CFR 1.142(b) and MPEP § 821.03. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-5, 7-10, 12, 13 and 20-22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claims 1 and 20 recite “an internal electronic circuit disposed within the active adapter, where the internal electronic circuit is configured to … add an identification associated with a sensor of the plurality of fuel height sensors ...”. However, the original disclosure does not disclose an internal electronic circuit disposed within an active adapter that performs the claimed function. Instead, the function is performed by a microcontroller 122 that is not part of an active adapter (the microcontroller 122 is part of the probe electronics package). Therefore, the original disclosure does not support that the inventors possessed the claimed invention. Claims 2-5, 7-10, 12, 13, 21 and 22 depend on claims 1 or 20 and are rejected for inheriting the same problem. The examiner notes that withdrawn (and amended) claim 14 appears to have the same problem as claims 1 and 20. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. U.S. Patent 7,802,753 issued to Tichborne et al. (“Tichborne”) is cited for all that it discloses including a fuel height sensor that includes a local ground connection. U.S. Patent 5,839,094 issued to French (“French”) is cited for all that it discloses including an internal electronic circuit configured to add an identification associated with a sensor of a plurality of sensors. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JUSTIN N OLAMIT whose telephone number is (571)270-1969. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8 am - 5 pm (Pacific). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Stephen Meier can be reached at (571) 272-2149. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JUSTIN N OLAMIT/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2853
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 31, 2019
Application Filed
Oct 25, 2021
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jan 13, 2022
Interview Requested
Jan 21, 2022
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 21, 2022
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 27, 2022
Response Filed
Jan 31, 2022
Final Rejection — §112
Mar 09, 2022
Interview Requested
Apr 04, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 07, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
May 09, 2022
Request for Continued Examination
May 16, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 22, 2022
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Nov 25, 2022
Response Filed
Dec 05, 2022
Final Rejection — §112
Jan 12, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 03, 2023
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 06, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
May 08, 2023
Final Rejection — §112
Jun 26, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 01, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 10, 2023
Notice of Allowance
Oct 09, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 13, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 20, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 17, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 18, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 18, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 13, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
May 08, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
May 12, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Sep 15, 2025
Interview Requested
Sep 23, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 23, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 02, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 20, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Dec 03, 2025
Interview Requested
Dec 23, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 23, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Apr 15, 2026
Interview Requested

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601620
MEASURING DEVICE FOR METERING FLUIDS, AND METHOD FOR METERING BY MEANS OF A MEASURING DEVICE OF THIS TYPE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12601649
TRANSDUCER COMPRISING A DIAPHRAGM FOR USE WITH HYDROGEN-CONTAINING FLUID MEDIA
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12584894
GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12578218
HOUSING FOR CAPACITIVE LIQUID LEVEL SENSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12560466
NON-INVASIVE PLUMBING SENSOR SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

8-9
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
71%
With Interview (+8.8%)
2y 9m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 793 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month