Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 16/707,067

ORAL COMPOSITION INCLUDING GELS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Dec 09, 2019
Examiner
MAYES, DIONNE WALLS
Art Unit
1747
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Nicoventures Trading Limited
OA Round
7 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
7-8
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
91%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allow Rate
348 granted / 545 resolved
-1.1% vs TC avg
Strong +27% interview lift
Without
With
+27.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
25 currently pending
Career history
570
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
50.5%
+10.5% vs TC avg
§102
18.1%
-21.9% vs TC avg
§112
21.3%
-18.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 545 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on April 30, 2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-4, 8, 11, 14 and 24-28 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding independent claim 1 (and, therefore, those that depend therefrom), in the amendment filed on April 30, 2025, Applicant amended the claims to include the following claim limitation: “nicotine…calculated as a free base…”; however, it is not entirely clear what this recitation means as the instant disclosure does not appear to define “calculated as a free base”. It is presumed that this language is attempting to recite the potency of nicotine in the oral composition but the specification does not indicate how exactly the potency is calculated, hence, the metes and bounds of the claim with this newly added phrase is unclear. It appears that Applicant is endeavoring to recite that the total concentration of the nicotine is measured based on weight of a unprotonated or “free” nicotine molecule rather than the weight of a nicotine salt or a mixture of salt and base forms, but it is not clear how this is measured. For example, is there an equation that the calculation is based on? Clarification and, preferably, claim amendment is requested. Also, regarding independent claim 1, the phrase “nicotine is bound to at least a portion of the filler composition” is unclear. A thorough reading of the instant specification reveals that there is no mention of what this “bound to” phrase means so, once again, the metes and bounds of the claim with this phrase in it is unclear. How exactly is the nicotine bound to at least a portion of the filler? Is it via absorption/adsorption? Is it via chemical bonding? Or is the nicotine merely combined with at least a portion of the filler? Clarification and, preferably, claim amendment is requested. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DIONNE WALLS MAYES whose telephone number is (571)272-5836. The examiner can normally be reached Mondays and Thursdays, 8:00AM - 4:00PM (EST). Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Michael H Wilson can be reached at 571-270-3882. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DIONNE W. MAYES/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1747
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Dec 09, 2019
Application Filed
Jun 02, 2022
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Sep 12, 2022
Response Filed
Feb 02, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §112
May 08, 2023
Response Filed
Aug 03, 2023
Final Rejection — §112
Oct 04, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 06, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 09, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 13, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
May 17, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Aug 08, 2024
Response Filed
Oct 29, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jan 29, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 07, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Apr 03, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 30, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
May 04, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 21, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12575610
ELECTRONIC VAPOR PROVISION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12564217
NICOTINE INHALER
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12557837
COMPOUND HORIZONTAL FILTER ASSEMBLY MACHINE AND PROCESS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12532910
Cartridge Cigarette Filter
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12527347
SMOKING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
91%
With Interview (+27.1%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 545 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month