Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 16/768,426

METHODS FOR PERSONAL CARE

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 29, 2020
Examiner
SMITH, KAITLYN ELIZABETH
Art Unit
3794
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Coologics Inc.
OA Round
9 (Non-Final)
59%
Grant Probability
Moderate
9-10
OA Rounds
3y 8m
To Grant
73%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 59% of resolved cases
59%
Career Allow Rate
474 granted / 809 resolved
-11.4% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
843
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
44.1%
+4.1% vs TC avg
§102
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
§112
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 809 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 25 November 2025 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 7-9 and 20-25 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Applicant states that support for the amendments can be found in the specification as originally filed and specifically in paragraphs 4, 7, 48, 50, 80 and 82 Paragraph 4 states “the device can cool the body surface or cavity to a temperature that inhibits growth of pathogens, changes in pathogen morphology, and/or disrupts biofilms.” However, this general statement about the device inhibiting/changing pathogens and/or disrupting biofilms makes no mention of pathogens that cause urinary tract infections contributing to preterm birth. Paragraph 7 states “In some embodiments, the pathogen is a pathogen that causes a health condition selected from preterm labor, premature rupture of membranes, bacterial vaginosis, urinary tract infection, dermatophytosis, onychomycosis, tinea pedis, tinea cruris, rash associated with pendulous breasts, diaper rash, and/or the like.” This provides support for pathogens that cause urinary tract infections as alternatives to pathogens that cause preterm labor or premature rupture of membranes. This paragraph does not provide for the pathogen that causes urinary tract infections to be the same pathogen that causes preterm labor or premature rupture of membranes. Paragraph 48 states “Embodiments of the invention also encompass a method of treating and inhibiting the abnormal growth of a pathogen, changing morphologies and disrupting biofilms on a body surface or cavity…” and goes on to discusses the method steps of freezing or cooling the device, placing the device and so on. This paragraph provides a general outline of a method of treating a pathogen on a body surface or cavity, but does not provide for the pathogen to be a pathogen that causes urinary tract infection or that such a pathogen contributes to preterm birth, premature labor or contractions, premature cervical dilation, premature cervical effacement or cervical incompetence or premature rupture of membranes or such treatment free from use of a chemical. Paragraph 50 states “The device acts via passive heat absorption….allowing the nail to grow normally and the tissue to heal….uses no systemic chemicals, is non-toxic, safe, and is faster-acting especially as it relates to tine cruris and pedis.” This paragraph does not provide for the pathogen to be a pathogen that causes urinary tract infection or that such a pathogen contributes to preterm birth, premature labor or contractions, premature cervical dilation, premature cervical effacement or cervical incompetence or premature rupture of membranes. Paragraph 80 specifically discloses that the frequency of urinary tract infections is increased in pregnancy and as a result antibiotics are administered during pregnancy to treat UTIs. These antibiotics shift the pH of the vagina which encourages the development of VVC which paragraph 78 associates with premature delivery and premature rupture of membranes. Paragraph 78 specifically states that “The purpose of this aspect of the invention is to introduce a non-chemical method to treat vaginal candidiasis and other microbial conditions of the vagina…” Here, Applicant has linked the administration of antibiotics to treat a urinary tract infection to a shift in vaginal pH which encourages the development of VVC that is then treatment by the method of the invention to prevent preterm birth, premature labor or contractions, premature cervical dilation, premature cervical effacement or cervical incompetence or premature rupture of membranes. Therefore, it is the VVC which the method treats free from the use of chemicals to prevent preterm birth, premature labor or contractions, premature cervical dilation, premature cervical effacement or cervical incompetence or premature rupture of membranes. Applicant has not linked pathogens that cause urinary tract infections to preterm birth, premature labor or contractions, premature cervical dilation, premature cervical effacement or cervical incompetence or premature rupture of membranes or chemical free treatment of pathogens that cause urinary tract infections to prevention of preterm birth, premature labor or contractions, premature cervical dilation, premature cervical effacement or cervical incompetence or premature rupture of membranes. Paragraph 82 generally states that “Disclosed herein are method and deices for preventing or treating preterm birth, premature labor or contractions, premature cervical dilation or cervical incompetence, or premature rupture of membranes by the administration of a topical cooling device to a body cavity or surface for a sufficient frequency and duration of time to change microbial pathogen morphology, induce microbial dormancy, reduce biofilms, stop contractions, stop cervical dilation, or to prevent the occurrence of preterm birth or premature rupture of membranes before 37 weeks gestational age.” This paragraph provides a general outline of a method of treating a pathogen on a body surface or cavity, but does not provide for the pathogen to be a pathogen that causes urinary tract infection or that such a pathogen contributes to preterm birth, premature labor or contractions, premature cervical dilation, premature cervical effacement or cervical incompetence or premature rupture of membranes or such treatment free from use of a chemical. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 7-9 and 20-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 7 recites “applying the device to a body surface or cavity to inhibit growth of a pathogen on the body surface or cavity that can contribute to preterm birth, premature labor or contractions, premature cervical dilation, premature cervical effacement or cervical incompetence or premature rupture of membranes free of use of a chemical to prevent preterm birth, premature labor or contractions, premature cervical dilation, premature cervical effacement or cervical incompetence or premature rupture of membranes, wherein the pathogen causes urinary tract infection” and claims 20 and 25 recite “applying the device to a body surface or cavity to inhibit growth of a pathogen on the body surface or cavity free of use of a chemical to prevent preterm birth, premature labor or contractions, premature cervical dilation, premature cervical effacement or cervical incompetence or premature rupture of membranes, wherein the pathogen causes urinary tract infection” and the specification does not provide for the connection between chemical free treatment of urinary tract infections and the prevention of preterm birth, premature labor or contractions, premature cervical dilation, premature cervical effacement or cervical incompetence or premature rupture of membranes.” The specification does not draw a connection between the treatment of pathogens that cause urinary tract infections free from use of a chemical and the prevention of preterm birth, premature labor or contractions, premature cervical dilation, premature cervical effacement or cervical incompetence or premature rupture of membranes. In paragraphs 7 and 13 urinary tract infection is presented as an alternative health condition to preterm labor and premature rupture of membranes. Additionally, paragraph 80 specifically discloses that the frequency of urinary tract infections is increased in pregnancy and as a result antibiotics are administered during pregnancy to treat UTIs. These antibiotics shift the pH of the vagina which encourages the development of VVC which paragraph 78 associates with premature delivery and premature rupture of membranes. Paragraph 78 specifically states that “The purpose of this aspect of the invention is to introduce a non-chemical method to treat vaginal candidiasis and other microbial conditions of the vagina…” Here, Applicant has linked the administration of antibiotics to treat a urinary tract infection to a shift in vaginal pH which encourages the development of VVC that is then treatment by the method of the invention to prevent preterm birth, premature labor or contractions, premature cervical dilation, premature cervical effacement or cervical incompetence or premature rupture of membranes. Therefore, it is the VVC which the method treats free from the use of chemicals to prevent preterm birth, premature labor or contractions, premature cervical dilation, premature cervical effacement or cervical incompetence or premature rupture of membranes. Applicant has not linked pathogens that cause urinary tract infections to preterm birth, premature labor or contractions, premature cervical dilation, premature cervical effacement or cervical incompetence or premature rupture of membranes or chemical free treatment of pathogens that cause urinary tract infections to prevention of preterm birth, premature labor or contractions, premature cervical dilation, premature cervical effacement or cervical incompetence or premature rupture of membranes. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KAITLYN E SMITH whose telephone number is (571)270-5845. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Linda Dvorak can be reached on (571)272-4764. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KAITLYN E SMITH/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3794
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 29, 2020
Application Filed
May 06, 2022
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Aug 08, 2022
Response Filed
Oct 04, 2022
Final Rejection — §112
Dec 29, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 13, 2023
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 19, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 24, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Apr 26, 2023
Response Filed
Jun 30, 2023
Final Rejection — §112
Oct 03, 2023
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 03, 2023
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 06, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 19, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 19, 2023
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 03, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jan 29, 2024
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 29, 2024
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 30, 2024
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 31, 2024
Response Filed
Feb 05, 2024
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 29, 2024
Final Rejection — §112
Sep 16, 2024
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 16, 2024
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 02, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 07, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 14, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
May 19, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 27, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Oct 28, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 25, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 26, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599775
PULSED RADIO FREQUENCY THERAPY SYSTEM, APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR USING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12594432
THERAPEUTIC APPARATUS AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12582547
Handheld Palm Cooling Device
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12582548
IN VIVO TEMPERATURE CONTROL SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12558257
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR TREATMENT OF OBSTRUCTIVE SLEEP APNEA
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

9-10
Expected OA Rounds
59%
Grant Probability
73%
With Interview (+14.6%)
3y 8m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 809 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month