Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 16/768,970

Negative Electrode Slurry Composition, and Negative Electrode and Secondary Battery, Manufactured Using the Same

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 02, 2020
Examiner
CHUO, TONY SHENG HSIANG
Art Unit
1751
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Lg Chem, LTD.
OA Round
8 (Non-Final)
46%
Grant Probability
Moderate
8-9
OA Rounds
4y 0m
To Grant
54%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 46% of resolved cases
46%
Career Allow Rate
319 granted / 696 resolved
-19.2% vs TC avg
Moderate +8% lift
Without
With
+8.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 0m
Avg Prosecution
54 currently pending
Career history
750
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
58.4%
+18.4% vs TC avg
§102
18.9%
-21.1% vs TC avg
§112
17.7%
-22.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 696 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 8/15/25 has been entered. Response to Amendment Claims 1 and 6-11 are currently pending. Claims 2-5 are cancelled. The amended claim 1 does overcome the previously stated 103 rejection. However, upon further consideration, claims 1 and 6-11 are rejected under the following new 103 rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1 and 6-11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim et al (US 2006/0257738, previously cited) in view of Ichikawa et al (US 2014/0045053, previously cited), and further in view of Ryu et al (KR 20150025665 A, machine translation). Regarding claims 1 and 6-11, Kim et al discloses a lithium secondary cell (secondary battery) comprising a cathode (positive electrode), an anode (negative electrode), and a separator; wherein the anode comprises a copper foil (current collector), and an anode active material slurry (negative electrode slurry composition / negative electrode active material layer) formed on a side of the copper foil, wherein the anode active material slurry comprises an anode active material (negative electrode active material), a conductive agent, a dispersant comprising a polymer backbone and a side-chain (hydrophobically modified alkali-swellable emulsion) dispersed in water (solvent), and a binder that is styrene-butadiene-based polymer resin; wherein examples of the polymer backbone include an acrylic polymer; wherein the anode active material slurry (negative electrode slurry composition) comprises: 90 wt% to 97 wt% of the anode active material (negative electrode active material), 0.1 wt% to 1 wt% of the dispersant (hydrophobically modified alkali-swellable emulsion), 0.5 wt% to 10 wt% of the binder ([0011]-[0024],[0048],[0074]). However, Kim et al does not expressly teach an acrylic polymer in which a hydrophobic function group is bonded as a pendant group to a polymer electrolyte main having an acid functional group, wherein the hydrophobic functional group is an alkyl group of 5 to 20 carbon atoms (claim 1). Ichikawa et al discloses a dispersant comprising a [copolymer of a first monomer and a second monomer] (acrylic polymer), wherein the first monomer is a (meth)acrylate having a straight chained alkyl group of at least 8 carbon atoms at a side chain (pendant group), wherein the second monomer is at least one kind selected from (meth)acrylate, …, styrene, acrylic acid (acid functional group), methacrylic acid (acid functional group), vinyl acetate, …; wherein the combination of the first monomer and the second monomer is construed as a polymer electrolyte main chain ([0128]-[0147]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the Kim dispersant to include a copolymer of a (meth)acrylate having a straight chained alkyl group of 8 carbon atoms at a side chain and a second monomer in order to utilize a dispersant that reduces the viscosity of the anode active material slurry, thereby facilitating a coating in an uniform thickness or in thin film ([0102]). In addition, the invention as a whole would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made because the disclosure of Ichikawa indicates that acrylic acid or methacrylic acid is a suitable material for use as a second monomer. The selection of a known material based on its suitability for its intended use has generally been held to be prima facie obvious (MPEP §2144.07). As such, it would be obvious to use acrylic acid or methacrylic acid. However, Kim et al as modified by Ichikawa et al does not expressly teach a negative electrode slurry that does not include a viscosity increasing agent, wherein the viscosity increasing agent is carboxymethyl cellulose (claim 1); wherein negative electrode slurry composition further comprises a filler (claim 7). Ryu et al teaches the concept of adding a dispersant of specific structure to an electrode slurry, wherein the electrode slurry does not include a thickener (viscosity increasing agent) such as carboxymethyl cellulose, wherein the electrode slurry using an SBR-based binder (styrene-butadiene rubber-based binder) and a thickener has difficulty in dispersion due to the difference in specific gravity with the electrode active material, which causes problem in controlling and maintaining viscosity over time, and uniform dispersion of the active material over the entire electrode surface cannot be expected, which causes difficulty in coating ([0008]-[0012],[0059]); wherein a negative electrode slurry contains a negative electrode active material, conductive material, binder, and filler ([0042]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time the invention was made to modify the Kim/Ichikawa anode to include an anode active material slurry that does not include a viscosity increasing agent that is carboxymethyl cellulose, wherein the anode active material slurry further comprises a filler in order to prevent difficulty in dispersion due to difference in specific gravity with the electrode active material, thereby improving battery capacity, rate characteristics, and cycle characteristics of the battery ([0009],[0071]). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1 and 6-11 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TONY S CHUO whose telephone number is (571)272-0717. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 9:00am - 5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jonathan Leong can be reached on 571-270-1292. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /T.S.C/Examiner, Art Unit 1751 /JONATHAN G LEONG/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1751 8/28/2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jun 02, 2020
Application Filed
Feb 04, 2022
Non-Final Rejection — §103
May 10, 2022
Response Filed
Aug 15, 2022
Final Rejection — §103
Nov 02, 2022
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 02, 2022
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 18, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 01, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 15, 2022
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 25, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 26, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jul 12, 2023
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 12, 2023
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 05, 2023
Response Filed
Nov 07, 2023
Final Rejection — §103
Feb 08, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 12, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 26, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 09, 2024
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 09, 2024
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 30, 2024
Response Filed
Nov 07, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Feb 13, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 11, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Aug 13, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Aug 13, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Aug 15, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 19, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 12, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Nov 12, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 02, 2025
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12592378
NEGATIVE ELECTRODE PLATE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF, SECONDARY BATTERY, BATTERY MODULE, BATTERY PACK, AND ELECTRICAL APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12573636
BINDER SOLUTION FOR ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERY, ELECTRODE SLURRY FOR ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERY COMPRISING THE SAME AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING ALL-SOLID-STATE BATTERY USING THE SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12537195
POSITIVE ELECTRODE ACTIVE MATERIAL FOR NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SECONDARY BATTERIES, AND NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE SECONDARY BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12531302
TOP COVER ASSEMBLY, SECONDARY BATTERY, BATTERY MODULE, AND ELECTRICITY-CONSUMPTION DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 20, 2026
Patent 12482899
NONWOVEN FABRIC AND BATTERY SEPARATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

8-9
Expected OA Rounds
46%
Grant Probability
54%
With Interview (+8.0%)
4y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 696 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month