Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026
Application No. 16/769,975

MECHANISM FOR OPTIMISING A MANUAL ANGULAR ADJUSTMENT

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Apr 13, 2023
Priority
Dec 05, 2017 — FR 1761662 +1 more
Examiner
GUADALUPE, YARITZA
Art Unit
2855
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Seco Tools Tooling Systems
OA Round
2 (Final)
82%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
97%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 82% — above average
82%
Career Allowance Rate
956 granted / 1161 resolved
+14.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +15% lift
Without
With
+14.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
1172
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
39.9%
-0.1% vs TC avg
§102
46.2%
+6.2% vs TC avg
§112
6.7%
-33.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1161 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION In response to the Amendment filed June 8, 2026 Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Priority Receipt is acknowledged of certified copies of papers required by 37 CFR 1.55. Drawings The drawings objection as set forth in the Non-Final Office Action from March 9, 2026 has been withdrawn. Abstract The Abstract filed June 4, 2020 is accepted. Specification The amendment to the specification filed June 4, 2020 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1 – 2 and 4 - 5 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by JP H0649906. With respect to claim 1, JP discloses an assembly comprising a fixed mount (2), a mobile part (3) having at least one approximately circular face (See Figure 3a, 3b) mounted on the fixed mount (2) so that the part is mounted so as to be mobile in rotation around an axis approximately centered on the circular face (See specification cited below); a device (i.e. micrometer) arranged for the positional adjustment of the mobile part (3) in relation to the mount (2), the device including at least one first scale (21) located in an area linked to the fixed mount (2) and positioned on at least one portion of the periphery of the mobile part (See Figure 3a, 3b), the first scale (21) being a measuring scale, and at least one second scale (31) positioned on the circular face of the mobile part, the second scale (31) being a Vernier scale (See specification below), wherein the area associated with the mount bearing the first scale (21) constitutes a second part mounted so as to be mobile in rotation in relation to the mount, around a swivel pin (5) shared with a swivel pin of the mobile part (See Figures 3a, 3b). PNG media_image1.png 434 368 media_image1.png Greyscale PNG media_image2.png 258 896 media_image2.png Greyscale Referring to claim 2, JP sets forth the assembly wherein the at least one first scale (21) includes at least one mark corresponding to a reference value that is adjustable vis-a-vis a mark on the at least one second scale (31) of the mobile part in an immobile position. In regards to claim 4, JP teaches an assembly wherein at least the mobile part (3) mounted so as to be mobile in rotation in relation to the mount (2) is combined with a braking mechanism (i.e. stopper 63) for the rotation of the mobile part (3). With regards to claim 5, JP shows the assembly wherein at least the mobile part (3) mounted so as to be mobile in rotation in relation to the mount (2) is combined with an incrementation mechanism (i.e. along the axial direction A-A). PNG media_image3.png 258 896 media_image3.png Greyscale Allowable Subject Matter Claim 3 is objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. Reasons for Allowance The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: Claim 3 is allowable because the prior art fails to teach or suggest an assembly wherein the area bearing the at least one first scale takes the form of a circular ring centered on a swivel pin of the mobile part bearing the at least one second scale in combination with the remaining limitations of the claims. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1 – 2 and 4 - 5 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. The following references are considered relevant but fail to teach the combination as claimed: Fath (DE 4316583 A) discloses a template which is to be moved against the circumference of an abrasive wheel, fixed to the upper part of a template carrier consisting of a lower part, on which a middle part is mounted so as to be pivotable about a first horizontal axis. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to YARITZA GUADALUPE-MCCALL whose telephone number is (571)272-2244. The examiner can normally be reached Mon -Thu, 8:00am - 6:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Laura E Martin can be reached at 571-272-2160. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. YARITZA GUADALUPE-MCCALL Primary Examiner Art Unit 2855 July 8, 2026 /YARITZA GUADALUPE-MCCALL/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2855
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Apr 13, 2023
Application Filed
Mar 07, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §102
Jun 08, 2026
Response Filed
Jul 13, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12693094
ADJUSTABLE ARCHERY BOW SIGHT
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12692843
AN APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING ORIENTATION OF A SEGMENT OF A WIND TURBINE BLADE AND A METHOD THEREOF
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12687380
PRECISION CUTTING GUIDE SYSTEM
3y 9m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Patent 12680803
MEASURING DEVICE
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680324
Laszlo stud leveler
2y 11m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
82%
Grant Probability
97%
With Interview (+14.8%)
2y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 1161 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month