Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 16/827,551

Seed Endophytes Across Cultivars and Species, Associated Compositions, and Methods of Use Thereof

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Mar 23, 2020
Examiner
TICHY, JENNIFER M.H.
Art Unit
1653
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Indigo AG Inc.
OA Round
4 (Final)
65%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 65% — above average
65%
Career Allow Rate
395 granted / 606 resolved
+5.2% vs TC avg
Strong +34% interview lift
Without
With
+34.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
77 currently pending
Career history
683
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.7%
-36.3% vs TC avg
§103
36.0%
-4.0% vs TC avg
§102
20.2%
-19.8% vs TC avg
§112
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 606 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . This Office Action is in response to the paper filed 12 November 2025. Claim 87 has been amended. Claims 3, 8-14, and 17, and the species of SEQ ID NOs: 1-302 and 304-455, remain withdrawn. Claims 87-94, 108, and 109 are currently pending and under examination. This application claims benefit of priority to International Application No. PCT/US2015/038187, filed June 26, 2015, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/156,021, filed May 1, 2015, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/156,028, filed May 1, 2015, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/098,296, filed December 30, 2014, US. Provisional Application No. 62/098,298, filed December 30, 2014, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/098,299, filed December 30, 2014, U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/098,302, filed December 30, 2014, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/098,304, filed December 30, 2014. Withdrawal of Rejections: The rejection of claims 87-94 under 35 U.S.C. 101 because the claimed invention is directed to a natural product without significantly more, is withdrawn. The rejection of claims 87-94 under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement, is withdrawn. The rejection of claims 87-93 under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Hattingh et al., is withdrawn. The rejection of claims 87, 94, 108, and 109 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Hattingh et al., and further in view of Henn et al., is withdrawn. Claim Objections Claims 108 and 109 with the elected species of SEQ ID NO: 303 are allowable. These claims are objected to due to the presence of the non-elected species SEQ ID NOs: 1-302 and 304-455. To overcome this objection, it is suggested that the non-elected species be removed. New Rejections Necessitated by Amendment: Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 87-94 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The term “increases resistant” in claim 87 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “increases” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. Here, there metes and bounds are indefinite, because it is unclear what the baseline/control amount is intended to be for determining if resistance to fungal pathogen stress has been increased. Claims 88-94 are included in this rejection, as these claims depend from above rejected claims and fails to remedy the noted deficiencies. Response to Arguments In view of Applicant’s amendments/argument, the previous rejections have been withdrawn. Therefore, Applicant’s arguments are moot. However, new rejections have been set forth above. Conclusion Claims 87-94 are rejected but with the elected species of SEQ ID NO: 303 appear to be free of the art. Claims 108 and 109 are objected to due to the presence of non-elected species, but are allowable with the elected species of SEQ ID NO: 303. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JENNIFER M.H. TICHY whose telephone number is (571)272-3274. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday, 9:00am-7:00pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Sharmila G. Landau can be reached at (571)272-0614. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JENNIFER M.H. TICHY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1653
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 23, 2020
Application Filed
Jun 26, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Oct 01, 2024
Response Filed
Dec 11, 2024
Final Rejection — §112
Jun 13, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 08, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Nov 12, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 24, 2026
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600935
DEVICE FOR FORMING AND COUNTING SPHEROIDS AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME, AND SPHEROID CULTURING METHOD AND COUNTING METHOD USING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12593849
NOVEL TEMPERATURE-OPTMIZED BACILLI
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12577532
XENO-FREE AND TRANSGENE-FREE REPROGRAMING OF MESENCHYMAL STEM CELLS TOWARD NEURAL PROGENITOR CELLS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12577525
METHOD OF PURIFYING A PROTEIN FROM FERMENTATION SOLIDS UNDER DESORBING CONDITIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571022
METHODS FOR QUANTIFYING MIXED-LINKAGE BETA GLUCAN
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
65%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+34.4%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 606 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month