Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 16/866,200

GREASE MANIFOLD SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 04, 2020
Priority
May 03, 2019 — provisional 62/842,793
Examiner
BUSE, MARK KENNETH
Art Unit
3654
Tech Center
3600 — Transportation & Electronic Commerce
Assignee
Gjr Meyer Service Inc.
OA Round
8 (Non-Final)
77%
Grant Probability
Favorable
8-9
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 77% — above average
77%
Career Allowance Rate
556 granted / 719 resolved
+25.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
21 currently pending
Career history
737
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
71.9%
+31.9% vs TC avg
§102
9.6%
-30.4% vs TC avg
§112
16.0%
-24.0% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 719 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on June 9, 2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claims 1-4 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the written description requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to reasonably convey to one skilled in the relevant art that the inventor or a joint inventor, or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the inventor(s), at the time the application was filed, had possession of the claimed invention. Claim 1, lines 12/13 recite “…the first greasing parameter ends upon the wellhead pressure decreasing below the first preset pressure,”. Examiner cannot find support in the Specification that the first greasing parameter ends upon the wellhead pressure decreasing below the first preset pressure. Pertinent paragraphs appear to be [0005 and 0023] with [0023] disclosing “the grease cycle starts automatically when wellhead pressure passes a preset limit indicating pressure pumping has started”. However, there does not appear to be written description of what ends the first greasing parameter. Paragraph [0005] mentions …”the programmable logic controller may then deactivate the grease pump….upon reaching a preset grease amount”. However, this is not what is claimed in amended claim 1 as to how the first greasing parameter ends. Claims 2-4 are rejected due to their dependance on claim 1. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 5-7 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being incomplete for omitting essential steps, such omission amounting to a gap between the steps. See MPEP § 2172.01. The omitted steps are: claim 5 lacks the entire method step of what begins the second greasing parameter. Lines 10-13 recite “wherein the second greasing parameter begins upon the wellhead pressure increasing to a first preset pressure, upon the second greasing parameter beginning supplying a preset volume of grease through the selected fluid pathway.” However, an essential part of this greasing step appears to be missing. Paragraph [0024] states if stage based greasing (same as second greasing parameter per paragraph [0005]) is selected when the system sees a pressure increase on the wellhead and then a pressure decrease, although not necessarily to zero but to a preset level, one stage has been completed. Upon completion of a stage and once the wellhead is at the lower pressure grease is pumped to the desired valves grease. Claim 5 omits this important step of the wellhead pressure has to see a pressure decrease before greasing begins. Claims 6 and 7 are rejected due to their dependance on claim 5. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-7 would be allowable if rewritten or amended to overcome the rejection(s) under 35 U.S.C. 112(a)(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), 2nd paragraph, set forth in this Office action. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks, filed June 9, 2026, with respect to claims 1-4 have been fully considered and are persuasive. The prior art rejection of claims 1-4 have been withdrawn. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MARK KENNETH BUSE whose telephone number is (571)270-3139. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 am to 5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Hodge can be reached on 571 272-2097. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /M.K.B/Examiner, Art Unit 3654 /ROBERT W HODGE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3654
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 11 earlier events
Jun 05, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 09, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Dec 22, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 07, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Jun 09, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 14, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 26, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12655936
ALTERNATE LUBRICATION MECHANISMS FOR VEHICLE BEARINGS OIL BAFFLES AND TRAPS
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Patent 12631292
Valve for Supplying and Purging Lubricants from Systems
1y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12631248
LUBRICANT DRIP PAN FOR A TRANSMISSION HOUSING OF A VEHICLE TRANSMISSION
1y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12624744
RAW EDGE COGGED V-BELT, METHOD FOR USING SAME, AND BELT TRANSMISSION MECHANISM
1y 5m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12612876
ALTERNATE LUBRICATION MECHANISM FOR VEHICLE BEARINGS
2y 2m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

8-9
Expected OA Rounds
77%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+9.0%)
2y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 719 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month