Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 16/882,987

MOTORIZED TENSIONING DEVICE WITH COMPACT SPOOL SYSTEM

Final Rejection §103
Filed
May 26, 2020
Examiner
KANE, KATHARINE GRACZ
Art Unit
3732
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Nike, Inc.
OA Round
8 (Final)
47%
Grant Probability
Moderate
9-10
OA Rounds
3y 8m
To Grant
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 47% of resolved cases
47%
Career Allow Rate
296 granted / 631 resolved
-23.1% vs TC avg
Strong +45% interview lift
Without
With
+45.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
61 currently pending
Career history
692
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.4%
-38.6% vs TC avg
§103
48.6%
+8.6% vs TC avg
§102
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
§112
18.1%
-21.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 631 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Applicant’s amendment filed on 1/23/2026 has been received; Claims 4-10 are pending. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 4-10 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Liu (U.S. 20030150135) in view of DiBenedetto et al. (U.S. 20070000154), Shand (CA 2911999) and further in view of Bidoia (U.S. Patent 4961544). Regarding claim 4, Liu teaches a modular footwear apparatus (100) comprising: an upper portion (12, 46, 31) (fig. 1, para. 23) including a lace (at least one of 46) to adjust fit of the upper portion against a foot (para. 25), the lace adjustable between a first position (32 extending into 31, 46 wound on spool, paras. 25,29, fig. 5) and a second position (32 pulled out of 31, 46 loosened, para. 30, fig. 7) based at least in part on manipulation of an effective length of the lace (paras. 25,29,30, figs. 5,7); a sole structure (11) coupled to the upper portion (fig. 1); a battery (43, para. 25), positioned in the sole structure (para. 25); a motorized tensioning device, coupled to the battery, including: a lace spool (45) to engage the lace to enable manipulation of the effective length of the lace through rotation of the lace spool (para. 25); speed reduction gearing (44, fig. 3) operatively coupled to the lace spool (para. 25, fig. 3); and a motor (42) operatively coupled to the speed reduction gearing which includes one or more gears (one or more gears of 44), wherein the motor is configured to turn the speed reduction gearing to rotate the lace spool (para. 25); and a control unit (60), operatively coupled to the motorized tensioning device, configured to cause the motorized tensioning device to rotate the lace spool to adjust between the first position and the second position (para. 27); But fails to teach the speed reduction gearing includes a worm drive operatively coupled to the lace spool, the motor operatively coupled to the worm drive, wherein the motor is configured to turn the worm drive to rotate the lace spool. DiBenedetto teaches a system to modify performance characteristic of an article of footwear including a control system, a power source coupled to the control system, an adjustable element and a driver coupled to the adjustable element wherein the driver adjusts the adjustable element in response to a signal from the control system (para. 12) and wherein the driver may comprise a worm drive and a gear train (para. 13). But fails to teach a worm drive operatively coupled to the lace spool. Shand teaches a system to modify performance characteristic of an article of footwear including a worm drive operatively coupled to a lace spool (Figures 1-5) Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have included a worm drive as part of the speed reduction gearing of Liu in view of DiBenedetto & Shand resulting in the worm drive being operatively coupled to the lace spool, the motor being operatively coupled to the worm drive, and the motor being configured to turn the worm drive to rotate the lace spool because it is known to one of ordinary skill in the mechanical arts that a worm drive offers the added benefits of quiet and smooth operation. The Liu/ DiBenedetto/Shand combined reference teaches the one or more gears (one or more gears of 44) are operatively coupled to a crankshaft (see annotated fig.) which is coupled to the motor (42)(para. 29), and the one or more gears are operatively coupled to the worm drive (as modified per claim 1)(fig. 3). The Liu/ DiBenedetto/Shand combined reference fails to teach the worm drive forms a self-locking mechanism. Bidoia teaches footwear including a cable tensioner wherein a cable is wound around a drum to tighten the cable, the cable tensioner including a gear wheel (29) and worm (30) forming a self-locking mechanism to maintain the cable tension as desired (col. 3, lines 49-68, col. 4, lines 1-19, 40-48). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filing date of the claimed invention for the worm drive of the Liu/ DiBenedetto combined reference to form a self-locking mechanism in view of Bidoia in order to maintain desired cable tension and prevent against undesired loosening of the cable. The Liu/ DiBenedetto/Shand/Bidoia combined reference teaches the motorized tensioning device is configured to switch among a plurality of preset tension settings (Liu, tightened state vs loosening state, paras. 29,30), including a fully tightened, a fully loosened and a plurality of intermediate preset positions between fully loosened and fully tightened (Liu, Para. 29 & 30, dependent on the pressure applied on control switch various tightened and loosened position can take place), based on interaction with a user interface (Liu, 324, upper surface of 60). Regarding claim 5, the Liu/ DiBenedetto/Shand/Bidoia combined reference teaches the motorized tensioning device is further configured to transition among a plurality of transitory states to incrementally increase or decrease the effective length of the lace (Liu, para. 29, plurality of transitory states as lace winds around spool providing incremental decrease in length of lace and/or para. 30, plurality of transitory states as lace unwinds from spool as 32 moves out of 31 providing incremental increase in length of the lace). Regarding claim 6, the Liu/ DiBenedetto/Shand/Bidoia combined reference teaches a decrease of the effective length of the lace corresponds to a tightening of the lace (Liu, para. 29) and an increase of the effective length of the lace corresponds to a loosening of the lace (Liu, para. 30, fig. 7). Regarding claim 7, the Liu/ DiBenedetto/Shand/Bidoia combined reference teaches wherein the plurality of preset tension settings include a preset tightened state (Liu, para. 29) and a preset loosened state (Liu, para. 30), wherein the preset tightened state corresponds to a state including a shortest effective lace length (Liu, para. 29) and the preset loosened state corresponds to a state including a longest effective lace length (Liu, para. 30). Regarding claim 8, the Liu/ DiBenedetto/Shand/Bidoia combined reference teaches the user interface is configured to increase the tension on the lace based on touching the user interface in a first location (Liu, upper surface of 60, para. 29) and decrease the tension on the lace based on touching the user interface in a second location (Liu, 324, para. 30). Regarding claim 9, the Liu/ DiBenedetto/Shand/Bidoia combined reference teaches the user interface (Liu, 324) is positioned between a first layer of the upper (Liu, top layer of 311, fig. 2) and a second layer of the upper (Liu, 314) and the user interface is configured to receive a touch by a user through the first layer (Liu, by way of opening 313) (figs. 2,5, para. 30). Regarding claim 10, the Liu/ DiBenedetto/Shand/Bidoia combined reference teaches the user interface (Liu, upper surface of 60) operatively coupled to the battery (Liu, paras. 28, 29); but fails to specifically teach a wiring portion, wherein the wiring portion further operatively couples the user interface to the battery. DiBenedetto further teaches the power source supplies power to the driver and control system via wires (162)(para. 113). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have provided the Liu/ DiBenedetto/Bidoia combined reference with a wiring portion operatively coupling the user interface to the battery in view of DiBenedetto in order to enable an electrical connection between the user interface and the battery. PNG media_image1.png 642 639 media_image1.png Greyscale Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the amended claims have been fully considered but are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection as discussed supra. Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KATHARINE KANE whose telephone number is (571)272-3398. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri 9am-6pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, KHOA HUYNH can be reached at 571-272-4888. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KATHARINE G KANE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3732
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 26, 2020
Application Filed
Oct 09, 2020
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 29, 2020
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 29, 2020
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 19, 2021
Response Filed
Feb 16, 2021
Final Rejection — §103
Aug 02, 2021
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 04, 2021
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 11, 2022
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 16, 2022
Response Filed
Nov 14, 2022
Final Rejection — §103
Apr 18, 2023
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 23, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 08, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 19, 2024
Response Filed
Sep 20, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
Nov 22, 2024
Notice of Allowance
Jun 23, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 25, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 22, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jan 23, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 26, 2026
Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599185
PROTECTIVE KNEE PAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12564247
ARTICLE OF FOOTWEAR WITH REEL CLOSURE AND SLIDABLE EYELET
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12538960
FOOT SUPPORT SYSTEMS INCLUDING FLUID MOVEMENT CONTROLLERS AND ADJUSTABLE FOOT SUPPORT PRESSURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12478118
Adapter System For Vest Closure Mechanisms
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 25, 2025
Patent 12471670
SOLE STRUCTURE HAVING A FLUID-FILLED CHAMBER FOR AN ARTICLE OF FOOTWEAR
2y 5m to grant Granted Nov 18, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

9-10
Expected OA Rounds
47%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+45.4%)
3y 8m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 631 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month