Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 16/936,086

METHOD FOR MIXING AND DISPENSING

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 22, 2020
Priority
Jan 12, 2004 — continuation of 10/729,795
Examiner
JOYNER, KEVIN
Art Unit
1799
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
VELTEK ASSOCIATES, INC.
OA Round
7 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
7-8
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
92%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
628 granted / 920 resolved
+3.3% vs TC avg
Strong +24% interview lift
Without
With
+23.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
952
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
67.5%
+27.5% vs TC avg
§102
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
§112
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 920 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on May 26th, 2026 has been entered. Claim Status Claims 1-3, 6-16, 19, 20, 23 and 24 are pending. Claims 9-15 are withdrawn as being directed to a non-elected invention. Claims 1-3, 6-8, 16, 19, 20, 23 and 24 are up for examination. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed May 26th, 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that: The Examiner contends that: "The reference of Vellutato discloses that the spout has an opened position and a closed position. As best shown in Figure 3, in which Figure 1 will perform in the exact same manner, the spout (18/66) has an opened position when the cap (28/68), and element (30/80) is removed therefrom as best shown in Figure 3; and the spout has a closed position when the cap (28/68) and element (30/80) is inserted therein as best shown in Figures 1 & 2. As such, Vellutato the newly provided limitations." (Office Action, p. 2) It is unclear what the Examiner is referring to by the numerals in the parenthesis. For instance, "spout (18/66)" does not appear to refer to the spout of Vellutato. In addition, Vellutato shows a spray bottle. The claims were amended to refer to the spout releasing liquid from a container to mix with liquid in another container. Vellutato is just a standard spray bottle, and is not arranged to mix with liquid in another container. Leoncavallo does not have a small bottle that can be closed. The Examiner would respectfully respond that: In addressing the Applicant’s arguments in the previous Office Action filed on November 24th, 2025 (See page 2), the Examiner inadvertently referenced Vellutato as disclosing the spout having an opened position and closed position, when in fact, it is the reference of Leoncavallo (U.S. Patent No. 6,305,576) that discloses the limitations of the spout having an opened position and closed position. In the same Office Action filed on November 24th, 2025 (See page 4 to page 5), the Examiner clearly explains and details that the reference of Leoncavallo discloses a spout having an opened position and a closed position to reject claim 1. For clarity, as shown below, Figure 3 of Leoncavallo, in which Figure 1 will perform in the exact same manner, the spout (18/66) has an opened position when the cap (28/68), and element (30/80) is removed therefrom as best shown in Figure 3; and the spout has a closed position when the cap (28/68) and element (30/80) is inserted therein as best shown in Figures 1 & 2. As such, Leoncavallo discloses these limitations. PNG media_image1.png 642 679 media_image1.png Greyscale As shown above, the openable closure member is the cap (28/68) on spout (18/66). The first and second chemical compositions are maintained apart when the cap (i.e., openable closure member) is fixed on the spout (i.e., when the closure member is closed). The cap (i.e., closure member) must be removed to mix the first and second chemical compositions (i.e., when the closure member is opened). As such, Leoncavallo discloses a first container (10) with a first chemical composition in a first compartment and a second container (30) with a second chemical composition in a second compartment in said first container, wherein the first container has an openable closure member (16/28) comprising a spout (18) having an opened position and a closed position (Figure 3 in which Figure 1 would operate in the same fashion), whereby the first chemical composition is maintained apart from said second chemical composition when the openable closure member (16/28) is closed, but can be combined with the second chemical composition when the closure member (16/28) is opened (Figure 1; column 3, line 62 to column 4, line 64). As such, the reference of Leoncavallo meets these limitations, and this response is not persuasive. Applicant also argues that: New claims 23-24 require the first container to be received in the second container. The combination of cited art fails to teach a first container that can be opened and closed, being contained in a second container to mix liquid contained therein. The Examiner would respectfully respond that: As noted below, the reference of Leoncavallo (U.S. Patent No. 6,305,576) discloses these limitations as well. Therefore, this response is also not persuasive. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claims 1-3, 6-8, 16, 19, 20, 23 and 24 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Vellutato (U.S. Patent No. 6,123,900) in view of Leoncavallo (U.S. Patent No. 6,305,576) and Carpenter (U.S. Patent No. 6,150,423). Regarding claims 1-3, 6, 16 and 19, Vellutato discloses a method of sterilizing a chemical composition (column 6, lines 45-67; column 7, lines 1-6) comprising the steps of: Providing a first container with a first chemical composition (column 1, lines 60-65); Sealing the first container in a first sealing layer to form a first sealed container enclosure (column 1, lines 60-65); Enclosing said first sealed container enclosure in a shipping container to form a closed shipping package (column 4, lines 46-64); and Externally irradiating said closed shipping package at a predetermined radiation level for a predetermined time interval to simultaneously sterilize said first chemical composition, said first container, said first sealed container enclosure, and said closed shipping package (column 5, lines 1-32) as disclosed in column 6 lines 45-67 and column 7 lines 1-6. Vellutato does not appear to disclose that the process comprises a second container with a second chemical composition, wherein the first container is positioned with respect to the second container so that the first chemical composition is maintained apart from said second chemical composition, but can be combined with the second chemical composition. However, it is generally known in the art of dispensing to utilize a first container that is positioned with respect to the second container so that the first chemical composition is maintained apart from said second chemical composition, but can be combined with the second chemical composition. Leoncavallo discloses such a dispenser in U.S. Patent No. 6,305,576. The reference teaches a dispenser providing a first container (10) with a first chemical composition in a first compartment and a second container (30) with a second chemical composition in a second compartment in said first container, wherein the first container has an openable closure member (16/28) comprising a spout (18) having an opened position and a closed position (Figure 3 in which Figure 1 would operate in the same fashion), whereby the first chemical composition is maintained apart from said second chemical composition when the openable closure member (16/28) is closed, but can be combined with the second chemical composition when the closure member (16/28) is opened (Figure 1; column 3, line 62 to column 4, line 64), wherein the second container is positioned inside as well as integral to the first container (concerning claims 2 and 3) in order to provide added convenience and environmental benefits as disclosed in column 1, lines 33-45. See Figure 1 and column 3, line 62 to column 4, line 64. The integral container of Leoncavallo is used for containing toxic chemical compositions that are utilized for laboratory, scientific or medical uses (column 1, lines 15-28). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to employ the container of Leoncavallo in the method of Vellutato, since the method of Vellutato achieves sterilization of medical and chemical compositions, wherein said compositions may be safely contained by the integral container of Leoncavallo. Indeed, one would have expected success when applying the method of Vellutato to containers such as that disclosed by Leoncavallo. Vellutato in view of Leoncavallo does not appear to disclose that the first chemical composition comprises a diluent and the second composition comprises a disinfectant liquid comprising phenol. However, it is conventionally known in the art of sterilization to prepare a sterilizing solution by mixing a diluent with a disinfecting liquid comprising phenol. Carpenter discloses an example of this in U.S. Patent No. 6,150,423. The reference discloses the preparation of a sterilizing solution wherein the first chemical composition comprises a diluent and the second chemical composition comprises a disinfecting liquid comprising phenol (column 2, lines 40-50). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to utilize a diluent as the first chemical composition and a disinfecting liquid comprising phenol as the second chemical composition in the method of Vellutato in view of Leoncavallo, as such are conventionally known and commonly used chemical compositions in the art of sterilization as exemplified by Carpenter. Furthermore, said solution is provided with a shelf life. In order to extend that shelf life, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill to separate the solution in the first and second containers of Vellutato in view of Leoncavallo so that the first container comprises the diluent and the second container comprises the disinfectant comprising phenol. Regarding claims 7, 8 and 20, Vellutato continues to disclose that the irradiating step comprises subjecting the closed shipping package to gamma radiation in the range of about 20 to 50 kilograys in a plurality of directions (column 5, lines 13-34). Concerning claims 1, 16, 23 and 24, Vellutato discloses a method of sterilizing a chemical composition (column 6, lines 45-67; column 7, lines 1-6) comprising the steps of: Providing a first container with a first chemical composition (column 1, lines 60-65); Sealing the first container in a first sealing layer to form a first sealed container enclosure (column 1, lines 60-65); Enclosing said first sealed container enclosure in a shipping container to form a closed shipping package (column 4, lines 46-64); and Externally irradiating said closed shipping package at a predetermined radiation level for a predetermined time interval to simultaneously sterilize said first chemical composition, said first container, said first sealed container enclosure, and said closed shipping package (column 5, lines 1-32) as disclosed in column 6 lines 45-67 and column 7 lines 1-6. Vellutato does not appear to disclose that the process comprises a second container with a second chemical composition, wherein the first container is positioned with respect to the second container so that the first chemical composition is maintained apart from said second chemical composition, but can be combined with the second chemical composition. However, it is generally known in the art of dispensing to utilize a first container that is positioned with respect to the second container so that the first chemical composition is maintained apart from said second chemical composition, but can be combined with the second chemical composition. Leoncavallo discloses such a dispenser in U.S. Patent No. 6,305,576. The reference teaches a dispenser providing a first container (82) with a first chemical composition in a first compartment and a second container (62) with a second chemical composition in a second compartment, wherein the first container (82) has an openable closure member (i.e., threaded cap 86)) comprising a spout (at threads 98) having an opened position and a closed position (Figure 3), whereby the first chemical composition is maintained apart from said second chemical composition when the openable closure member (i.e., threaded cap 86) is closed, but can be combined with the second chemical composition when the closure member (i.e., threaded cap 86) is opened (Figure 3; column 5, lines 7-23), wherein the first container (82) is received in the second container (62) in order to provide added convenience and environmental benefits as disclosed in column 1, lines 33-45. See Figure 3 and column 5, lines 7-23. More specifically, an operator can unscrew cap (68) from second container (62), remove first container (82) from second container (62), remove openable closure member (86) from first container (82), and manually pour the first chemical composition from first container (82) into second container (62). As such, these limitations are met by Leoncavallo. The integral container of Leoncavallo is used for containing toxic chemical compositions that are utilized for laboratory, scientific or medical uses (column 1, lines 15-28). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to employ the container of Leoncavallo in the method of Vellutato, since the method of Vellutato achieves sterilization of medical and chemical compositions, wherein said compositions may be safely contained by the integral container of Leoncavallo. Indeed, one would have expected success when applying the method of Vellutato to containers such as that disclosed by Leoncavallo. Vellutato in view of Leoncavallo does not appear to disclose that the first chemical composition comprises a diluent and the second composition comprises a disinfectant liquid comprising phenol. However, it is conventionally known in the art of sterilization to prepare a sterilizing solution by mixing a diluent with a disinfecting liquid comprising phenol. Carpenter discloses an example of this in U.S. Patent No. 6,150,423. The reference discloses the preparation of a sterilizing solution wherein the first chemical composition comprises a diluent and the second chemical composition comprises a disinfecting liquid comprising phenol (column 2, lines 40-50). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art at the time of the invention to utilize a diluent as the first chemical composition and a disinfecting liquid comprising phenol as the second chemical composition in the method of Vellutato in view of Leoncavallo, as such are conventionally known and commonly used chemical compositions in the art of sterilization as exemplified by Carpenter. Furthermore, said solution is provided with a shelf life. In order to extend that shelf life, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill to separate the solution in the first and second containers of Vellutato in view of Leoncavallo so that the first container comprises the diluent and the second container comprises the disinfectant comprising phenol. Therefore, claims 1, 16, 23 and 24 are rejected over Vellutato in view of Leoncavallo and Carpenter as well. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KEVIN C JOYNER whose telephone number is (571)272-2709. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 8:00AM-4:30PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, MICHAEL MARCHESCHI can be reached at (571) 272-1374. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KEVIN JOYNER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1799
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 9 earlier events
Apr 10, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 11, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
May 02, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Nov 03, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 24, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 26, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
May 27, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678524
SELF-CLEANING DOMESTIC APPLIANCE
3y 3m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12678530
AIR PURIFIER AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING THE SAME
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12678019
SHOE DISINFECTING DEVICE
3y 0m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12667640
AIR CONDITIONER INDOOR UNIT, AIR CONDITIONER, AND PURIFICATION CONTROL METHOD OF AIR CONDITIONER INDOOR UNIT
2y 11m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12653917
PLASMA TREATMENT APPARATUS AND METHOD USING SAME
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 16, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
92%
With Interview (+23.6%)
3y 0m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 920 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month