Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 16/943,623

BATTERY BLOCK, BATTERY PACK DEVICE, POWER SYSTEM, AND ELECTRIC VEHICLE

Non-Final OA §103§112
Filed
Jul 30, 2020
Examiner
MARTIN, ANGELA J
Art Unit
1727
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Murata Manufacturing Co. Ltd.
OA Round
6 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
6-7
OA Rounds
4y 1m
To Grant
35%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allow Rate
586 granted / 868 resolved
+2.5% vs TC avg
Minimal -32% lift
Without
With
+-32.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 1m
Avg Prosecution
81 currently pending
Career history
949
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
64.1%
+24.1% vs TC avg
§102
26.0%
-14.0% vs TC avg
§112
7.9%
-32.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 868 resolved cases

Office Action

§103 §112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . The Applicant has canceled claims 1-22. The Applicant has added new claims 23-38. The pending claims are claims 23-38. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/15/2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 23-38 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 23, the phrase "wherein the coupling members are provided so as to cooperate with other coupling members formed on a support body of another battery block to couple the battery blocks together” renders the claim indefinite because: a. It is unclear which coupling members are being referred to in each instance. b. The term “support body” is already provided in the claim, so it is unclear if the new “a support body” is meant to refer back to the previous recitation or introduce a newly required “support body”. c. It is unclear what exactly is being referred to by “the battery blocks” since several battery blocks have been recited in the claim at this point. Regarding claim 23, the phrase "a plurality of pieces of battery blocks" renders the claim indefinite because the claim reads as requiring nothing more than: “A battery pack device, comprising: a plurality of pieces of battery blocks”. If “a plurality of pieces of battery blocks” just means “a plurality of battery blocks” then I would encourage Applicant to delete “of pieces” because it renders the claim indefinite. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 23-38 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Yusa et al., US 2017/0244073, in view of Wang, CN 203103456. Regarding claim 23, Yusa et al., teaches a battery pack (abstract) comprising: a battery (battery pack) (abstract) including a plurality of batteries (0066) arranged in at least one row (Fig. 1-2); a support body (holder) configured to hold the plurality of batteries (0066); and a coupling member provided on the support body (holder), wherein the coupling member (connecting unit) is provided to cooperate with another coupling member (connecting unit) formed on a support body (holder) of another battery block (block 10B) to couple the battery blocks (10B) with each other (Fig. 2) and to locate at an equal position after the battery block is rotated in an equal plane (abstract; 0010; 0017; 0055), wherein the battery block is configured to switch (0068); wherein the battery block is configured to be rotated (abstract; 0061; 0091; 0101) around a longitudinal direction of the battery (0102; Fig. 12; “[0102] A fitting direction of the relay connector 30 to the connectors 11a and 11b is a direction perpendicular or substantially perpendicular to a connecting direction of a plurality of battery blocks 10B, that is to say, a rotational axis direction.”). Yusa et al., does not teach a switch from a series connection to a parallel connection, or from a parallel connection to a series connection, based on whether the battery block rotates. Wang teaches a switch (0002; 0007; 0019) from a series connection to a parallel connection (0019-0021), or from a parallel connection to a series connection (0019-0021), based on whether the battery block rotates (0010; 0020; 0036). Thus, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to insert the teachings of Wang into Yusa because Wang teaches “The turntable of the utility model includes a first rotating connector, a second rotating connector and a third rotating connector, which realize series-parallel switching of the battery pack by connecting to the contact pieces and the battery terminals in different ways. The design is ingenious and the switching is convenient..” (0020). Thus, one of ordinary skill in the art would be motivated to have a series-parallel conversion switch because “The design is ingenious and the switching is convenient.” (0020). Regarding claim 24, Yusa et al., teaches a plurality of connection electrodes (connector 30) are provided to connect the electrodes of the batteries of two adjacent battery blocks with each other (Fig. 6). Regarding claim 25, Yusa does not teach the batteries with even number of pieces are arranged in a row. However, the batteries with even number of pieces arranged in a row, is an obvious matter of design choice. In re Japikse, 181 F.2d 1019, 86 USPQ 70 (CCPA 1950). Regarding claim 26, Yusa et al., teaches the battery (ref. 101) arranged at a first end of the row and the battery arranged at a second end of the row have electrodes (positive electrode 101a; negative electrode 101b) exposed on an equal surface with different polarities (Fig. 6). Regarding claim 27, Yusa et al., teaches battery pack device according to wherein the positive electrodes (0067; 0069) and the negative electrodes (0067; 0069) are alternately exposed in the one row (Fig. 6). Regarding claim 28, Yusa et al., teaches battery pack device (abstract) according to wherein the coupling members includes first coupling members having projections (projections 111a, 122a, 132a) formed on a side surface of the support body (0069-0072) and second coupling members having recesses formed on a side surface of the support body (0061; 0070), and wherein the battery blocks adjacent to each other are configured to be coupled with each other by fitting the first coupling members and the second coupling members of the battery blocks adjacent to each other (0056; 0069-0070; 0072). Regarding claim 29, Yusa et al., teaches battery pack device according to wherein the first coupling members are provided on one side of a center line of the side surface of the support body (0054-0056; 0103). Regarding claim 30, Yusa et al., teaches battery pack device according to wherein the projections (0069-0072) and the recesses are integrally provided (0132) near a boundary position between upper and lower holders of the battery block (0066; 0069-0073). Regarding claim 31, Yusa et al., teaches power system (0123; 0185), wherein the battery pack device according to claim 23 is charged by a power generation device configured to generate power from renewable energy (0185; 0234). Regarding claim 32, Yusa et al., teaches power system (0123; 0185), comprising the battery pack device according to claim 23, wherein the power system is configured to supply electric power to an electronic device connected to the battery pack device (0185; 0234). Regarding claim 33, Yusa et al., teaches electric vehicle (0122) comprising: a converter that receives power supply from the battery pack device (0025) according to claim 23 and converts the power into driving force of the electric vehicle (0122); and a controller that performs information processing regarding vehicle control based on information of the battery pack device (0124; 0185; 0234). Regarding claim 34, Yusa et al., teaches power system comprising a power information transceiver (0124; 0185) configured to transmit and receive a signal (0097; 0104) to and from another device via a network (0097; 0104), wherein charging and discharging of the battery pack device (0079; 0097) according to claim 23 is performed based on information received by the power information transceiver (0121; 0126). Regarding claim 35, Yusa et al., teaches a power system (0124; 0185), wherein electric power is configured to be received from the battery pack device (0124) according to claim 23, or electric power (0124) is configured to be supplied from a power generation device (0124; 0185) or a power network to the battery pack device (0124; 0185: 0234). Regarding claim 36, Yusa et al., teaches battery pack device according to wherein the battery block (abstract; 0054-0063) has a box shape as a whole (Fig. 2-3), and the box shape has a first side surface and a second side surface (Fig. 2), a first end surface and a second end surface, and a top surface and a bottom surface (Fig. 2-3). Regarding claim 37, Yusa et al., teaches battery pack device (0053) according to wherein on the top surface, a first connection electrode (0038-0040) connects the positive electrodes of first and second batteries (0038-0040); a second connection electrode (abstract; 0021). Yusa does not teach connect the negative electrodes of third and fourth batteries and the positive electrodes of fifth and sixth batteries and a third connection electrode connects the negative electrodes of seventh and eighth batteries and wherein on the bottom surface, a fourth connection electrode connects the negative electrodes of the first and second batteries and the positive electrodes of the third and fourth batteries, and a fifth connection electrode connects the negative electrodes of the fifth and sixth batteries and the positive electrodes of the seventh and eighth batteries. However, the court held that mere duplication of parts has no patentable significance unless a new and unexpected result is produced. In re Harza, 274 F.2d 669, 124 USPQ 378 (CCPA 1960). Regarding claim 38, Yusa et al., teaches battery pack device (0121) according to wherein a control board bracket is attached to a mounting boss (connectors) (0053-0056) provided on a side surface of the battery block (0054-0066), and a control board is attached to the control board bracket (0097; 0126). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 12/15/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The Applicant has canceled claims 1-22 and has added new claims 23-38. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ANGELA J MARTIN whose telephone number is (571)272-1288. The examiner can normally be reached 7am-4pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Barbara Gilliam can be reached at 571-272-1330. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. ANGELA J. MARTIN Examiner Art Unit 1727 /ANGELA J MARTIN/Examiner, Art Unit 1727
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 30, 2020
Application Filed
Jul 28, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Oct 30, 2023
Response Filed
Jan 26, 2024
Final Rejection — §103, §112
Mar 28, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 01, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 19, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 22, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 13, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Feb 20, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 20, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Mar 06, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112
Jul 30, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 09, 2025
Final Rejection — §103, §112
Dec 15, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 18, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 04, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597613
NEGATIVE ELECTRODE COMPOSITION, NEGATIVE ELECTRODE SLURRY, NEGATIVE ELECTRODE PLATE, AND SECONDARY BATTERY AND ELECTRICAL DEVICE CONTAINING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592429
HEAT EXHANGER AND BATTERY SYSTEM INCLUDING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12586866
High-Strength Separator
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12562370
Electrode for Lithium Secondary Battery, Method of Preparing the Same and Lithium Secondary Battery Including the Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12548862
ELECTRODE ASSEMBLY AND BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

6-7
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
35%
With Interview (-32.4%)
4y 1m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 868 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month