Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 16/949,916

SCHEDULING REQUEST ASSOCIATED WITH ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 20, 2020
Examiner
KANG, SUK JIN
Art Unit
2477
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Qualcomm Incorporated
OA Round
8 (Non-Final)
67%
Grant Probability
Favorable
8-9
OA Rounds
3y 10m
To Grant
74%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 67% — above average
67%
Career Allow Rate
419 granted / 629 resolved
+8.6% vs TC avg
Moderate +7% lift
Without
With
+7.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
67 currently pending
Career history
696
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
§103
62.8%
+22.8% vs TC avg
§102
18.3%
-21.7% vs TC avg
§112
7.6%
-32.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 629 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Applicant’s amendment and arguments filed September 11, 2025 is acknowledged. Claims 1, 12, 25, and 28 have been amended. Claims 4, 8, 9, 16, 19, 27, and 30 are cancelled. Claims 1-3, 5-7, 10-15, 17, 18, 20-26, 28, 29, 31, and 32 are currently pending. Claim Objections Claims 1, 12, 25, and 28 are objected to because of the following informalities: in the body of the claims, replace “a size of the resource allocation or a configuration of the resource allocation” with -- a size of a resource allocation or a configuration of a resource allocation-- and “an uplink grant for a resource allocation” with --an uplink grant for the resource allocation-- or a different appropriate correction based on insufficient antecedent basis for the limitation (“resource allocation”) in the claims. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. The factual inquiries set forth in Graham v. John Deere Co., 383 U.S. 1, 148 USPQ 459 (1966), that are applied for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1, 2, 5-7, 10-13, 15, 17, 18, 20-22, 24, 25, 28, and 29 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang et al. (hereinafter Wang) (U.S. Patent Application Publication # 2019/0373554 A1) in view of Peng et al. (hereinafter Peng) (U.S. Patent Application Publication # 2019/0324805 A1), and further in view of WANG et al. (hereinafter Wang2) (U.S. Patent Application Publication # 2020/0229265 A1). Regarding claims 1 and 25, Wang teaches a method and apparatus for wireless communications at a user equipment (UE; figure 1), comprising: one or more memories (110, figure 1); and one or more processors (105, figure 1) coupled to the one or more memories, the one or more processors configured to: transmit a scheduling request (scheduling request, SR) that includes information associated with an artificial intelligence module (data associated with an application, such as the learning application, 135, figure 1) of the user equipment ([0002]; “…the UE may transmit a scheduling request (SR) to the network. In response, the network may transmit an uplink grant to the UE…”; [0025]; “…the UE may transmit a SR prior to the transmission of the data related to the application…”; [0029]; teaches transmitting a scheduling request (SR) indicating information associated with a learning application of the UE), wherein a scheduling request resource used to transmit the scheduling request indicates the artificial intelligence module (learning application, 135, figure 1) ([0025]; [0029]; [0032]; “…functionality provided by the self-learning application 135 and the SR power saving application 140 may be performed by a single application…”; [0043]; “…self-learning mode of operation may include collecting statistics related to the transmission of a SR…”; teaches the scheduling request (SR) indicates the learning and power saving application based in part on the resources used to transmit the SR); and receive an uplink grant (uplink grant) for a resource allocation that is based at least in part on the artificial intelligence module ([0002]; [0025]; [0029]; teaches receiving an uplink grant based in part on the learning application of the UE; [0091]). However, Wang may not explicitly disclose artificial intelligence information corresponding to an artificial intelligence module, wherein the artificial information indicates at least one of one or more weights or one or more parameters for the artificial intelligence module; and receive an uplink grant for a resource allocation that is based at least in part on the artificial intelligence information (although Wang does suggest information is included in the SR related to the learning application of the UE). Nonetheless, in the same field of endeavor, Peng teaches and suggests a scheduling request (scheduling request, figure 2) that includes artificial intelligence information (parameters of the deep learning task; [0028]) corresponding to an artificial intelligence module (prediction model; figure 2; [0028]), wherein the artificial information indicates at least one of one or more weights or one or more parameters for the artificial intelligence module (parameters of the deep learning task; [0028]) ([0028]; “…the processing parameter(s) of the deep learning task 220 may be sent by the user terminal 210 to the resource scheduler 230 within or together with the scheduling request 214…the resource prediction model 240, and the resource prediction model 240 may obtain corresponding information if required…”; [0032]; teaches the user terminal transmitting a scheduling request that includes information, such as processing parameters, related to a deep learning task/prediction model in relation to resource allocation); and receive an uplink grant for a resource allocation that is based at least in part on the artificial intelligence information (resource allocation; [0018]) ([0018]; [0025]; [0032]; teaches receiving resources allocation from a resource pool based on the parameters of the deep learning task). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate transmitting a scheduling request that includes information, such as processing parameters, related to a deep learning task/prediction model in relation to resource allocation as taught by Peng with the method and apparatus for transmitting a scheduling request and receiving an uplink grant as disclosed by Wang for the purpose of providing resource allocation and scheduling, as suggested by Peng. However, Wang, as modified by Peng, may not explicitly disclose wherein a size of the resource allocation or a configuration of the resource allocation is based at least in part on the artificial intelligence information, and wherein a scheduling request resource used to transmit the scheduling request indicates the artificial intelligence module, from a set of artificial intelligence modules. Nonetheless, in the same field of endeavor, Wang2 teaches and suggests wherein a size of the resource allocation or a configuration of the resource allocation is based at least in part on the artificial intelligence information (parameters) ([0009]; [0010]; “…a resource request message sent by the user equipment based on the dedicated resource configuration information, where the resource request message is used to request the first network device to allocate an uplink resource; sending, by the first network device, uplink grant information to the user equipment, where the uplink grant information is used to indicate the uplink resource used by the user equipment…”; [0290] [0292]; teaches configuration of the allocation of uplink resource allocation based on the parameters associated with the modules of the UE), and wherein a scheduling request resource used to transmit the scheduling request indicates the artificial intelligence module, from a set of artificial intelligence modules (modules; figure 7) ([0010]; “…a resource request message sent by the user equipment based on the dedicated resource configuration information, where the resource request message is used to request the first network device to allocate an uplink resource; sending, by the first network device, uplink grant information to the user equipment, where the uplink grant information is used to indicate the uplink resource used by the user equipment…”; [0290] [0292]; teaches resources used to send a scheduling request for resources based on the parameters associated with the plurality of modules of the UE) . Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate configuration of the allocation of uplink resource allocation based on the parameters associated with the modules of the UE and resources used to send a scheduling request for resources based on the parameters associated with the plurality of modules of the UE as taught by Wang2 with the learning applications/modules and method and apparatus for transmitting a scheduling request and receiving an uplink grant as disclosed by Wang, as modified by Peng, for the purpose of improve resource utilization efficiency, as suggested by Wang2 ([0004]). Regarding claims 2 and 15, Wang, as modified by Peng and Wang2, further teaches wherein the artificial intelligence module is one of a plurality of artificial intelligence modules associated with the user equipment, and wherein the artificial intelligence module is selected by the user equipment ([0029]; [0031]; [0032]; teaches the UE comprises a plurality of learning applications). Regarding claims 5 and 20, Wang discloses transmitting an SR and receiving an uplink grant based on the SR, but may not explicitly disclose wherein a phase of a transmission of the scheduling request indicates the artificial intelligence information. Nonetheless, in the same field of endeavor, Peng further teaches and suggests wherein a phase of a transmission of the scheduling request indicates the artificial intelligence information ([0005]; [0024]; [0029]; [0034]; teaches a completion time of the deep learning task included in the scheduling request). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate a completion time of the deep learning task included in the scheduling request as taught by Peng with the method and apparatus for transmitting a scheduling request and receiving an uplink grant as disclosed by Wang, as modified by Peng and Wang2, for the purpose of indicating information within a scheduling request. Regarding claims 6 and 21, Wang discloses transmitting an SR and receiving an uplink grant based on the SR, but may not explicitly disclose wherein the artificial intelligence information comprises one or more bits of the scheduling request. Nonetheless, in the same field of endeavor, Peng further teaches and suggests wherein the artificial intelligence information comprises one or more bits of the scheduling request ([0028]; teaches the scheduling request comprises bits of information related to an indication of the information in the scheduling request). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate the scheduling request comprises an indication of the information in the scheduling request as taught by Peng with the method and apparatus for transmitting a scheduling request and receiving an uplink grant as disclosed by Wang, as modified by Peng and Wang2, for the purpose of indicating information within a scheduling request. Regarding claim 7, Wang, as modified by Peng and Wang2, further teaches wherein the resource allocation is based at least in part on which scheduling request resource is used to transmit the scheduling request ([0002]; [0025]; [0038]; teaches transmitting a scheduling request (SR) using resources to transmit the SR during a subframe). Regarding claims 10 and 17, Wang, as modified by Peng and Wang2, further teaches wherein the one or more processors are configured to: perform an artificial intelligence operation based at least in part on the artificial intelligence module; and provide second information determined using the artificial intelligence module on the resource allocation ([0002]; [0025]; [0029]; teaches the UE comprises a plurality of learning applications and performing the application operations using the allocated resources). Regarding claims 11 and 18, Wang, as modified by Peng and Wang2, further teaches wherein the artificial intelligence module is a preferred artificial intelligence module selected by the user equipment ([0002]; [0025]; [0029]; teaches the UE comprises a plurality of learning applications). Regarding claims 12 and 28, Wang teaches a method and apparatus for wireless communications at a base station (eNB; [0005]), comprising: a memory (inherent component of an eNB); and one or more processors (inherent component of an eNB) coupled to the memory, the one or more processors configured to: receive a scheduling request (scheduling request, SR) that includes information associated with an artificial intelligence module (learning application, 135, figure 1) of a user equipment (UE; figure 1) ([0002]; [0025]; [0029]; teaches the eNB receiving a scheduling request (SR) indicating information associated with a learning application of the UE), wherein a scheduling request resource used to transmit the scheduling request indicates the artificial intelligence module (learning application, 135, figure 1) ([0025]; [0029]; [0032]; “…functionality provided by the self-learning application 135 and the SR power saving application 140 may be performed by a single application…”; [0043]; “…self-learning mode of operation may include collecting statistics related to the transmission of a SR…”; teaches the scheduling request (SR) indicates the learning and power saving application based in part on the resources used to transmit the SR); and transmit, to the user equipment, an uplink grant (uplink grant) for a resource allocation that is based at least in part on the artificial intelligence module ([0002]; [0025]; [0029]; teaches transmitting an uplink grant based in part on the learning application of the UE; [0091]). However, Wang may not explicitly disclose a scheduling request that includes artificial intelligence information corresponding to an artificial intelligence module, wherein the artificial information indicates at least one of one or more weights or one or more parameters for the artificial intelligence module; and transmitting an uplink grant for a resource allocation that is based at least in part on the artificial intelligence information (although Wang does suggest information is included in the SR related to the learning application of the UE). Nonetheless, in the same field of endeavor, Peng teaches and suggests a scheduling request (scheduling request, figure 2) that includes artificial intelligence information (parameters of the deep learning task; [0028]) corresponding to an artificial intelligence module (prediction model; figure 2; [0028]), wherein the artificial information indicates at least one of one or more weights or one or more parameters for the artificial intelligence module (parameters of the deep learning task; [0028]) ([0028]; “…the processing parameter(s) of the deep learning task 220 may be sent by the user terminal 210 to the resource scheduler 230 within or together with the scheduling request 214…the resource prediction model 240, and the resource prediction model 240 may obtain corresponding information if required…”; [0032]; teaches the user terminal transmitting a scheduling request that includes information, such as processing parameters, related to a deep learning task/prediction model in relation to resource allocation); and transmitting an uplink grant for a resource allocation that is based at least in part on the artificial intelligence information (resource allocation; [0018]) ([0018]; [0025]; [0032]; teaches transmitting resources allocation from a resource pool based on the parameters of the deep learning task). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate transmitting a scheduling request that includes information, such as processing parameters, related to a deep learning task/prediction model in relation to resource allocation as taught by Peng with the method and apparatus for transmitting a scheduling request and receiving an uplink grant as disclosed by Wang for the purpose of providing resource allocation and scheduling, as suggested by Peng. However, Wang, as modified by Peng, may not explicitly disclose wherein a size of the resource allocation or a configuration of the resource allocation is based at least in part on the artificial intelligence information, and wherein a scheduling request resource used to transmit the scheduling request indicates the artificial intelligence module, from a set of artificial intelligence modules. Nonetheless, in the same field of endeavor, Wang2 teaches and suggests wherein a size of the resource allocation or a configuration of the resource allocation is based at least in part on the artificial intelligence information (parameters) ([0009]; [0010]; “…a resource request message sent by the user equipment based on the dedicated resource configuration information, where the resource request message is used to request the first network device to allocate an uplink resource; sending, by the first network device, uplink grant information to the user equipment, where the uplink grant information is used to indicate the uplink resource used by the user equipment…”; [0290] [0292]; teaches configuration of the allocation of uplink resource allocation based on the parameters associated with the modules of the UE), and wherein a scheduling request resource used to transmit the scheduling request indicates the artificial intelligence module, from a set of artificial intelligence modules (modules; figure 7) ([0010]; “…a resource request message sent by the user equipment based on the dedicated resource configuration information, where the resource request message is used to request the first network device to allocate an uplink resource; sending, by the first network device, uplink grant information to the user equipment, where the uplink grant information is used to indicate the uplink resource used by the user equipment…”; [0290] [0292]; teaches resources used to send a scheduling request for resources based on the parameters associated with the plurality of modules of the UE) . Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate configuration of the allocation of uplink resource allocation based on the parameters associated with the modules of the UE and resources used to send a scheduling request for resources based on the parameters associated with the plurality of modules of the UE as taught by Wang2 with the learning applications/modules and method and apparatus for transmitting a scheduling request and receiving an uplink grant as disclosed by Wang, as modified by Peng, for the purpose of improve resource utilization efficiency, as suggested by Wang2 ([0004]). Regarding claim 13 and 29, Wang, as modified by Peng and Wang2, further teaches determining a selected artificial intelligence module based at least in part on the artificial intelligence module indicated by the scheduling request ([0002]; [0025]; [0029]; teaches the UE comprises a plurality of learning applications); and performing an operation based at least in part on the selected artificial intelligence module ([0002]; [0025]; [0029]; teaches the UE comprises a plurality of learning applications and performing the application operations using the allocated resources). Regarding claim 22, Wang discloses transmitting an SR and receiving an uplink grant based on the SR, but may not explicitly disclose the artificial intelligence information corresponding to the artificial intelligence module to another UE. Nonetheless, in the same field of endeavor, Peng further teaches and suggests the artificial intelligence information corresponding to the artificial intelligence module to another UE (one of another user terminal; figures 1-2) ([0038]; [0047]; teaches communicating information with another user terminal of the network). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate communicating information with another user terminal of the network as taught by Peng with the method and apparatus for transmitting a scheduling request and receiving an uplink grant as disclosed by Wang, as modified by Peng and Wang2, for the purpose indicating information within a scheduling request. Regarding claim 24, Wang, as modified by Peng and Wang2, further teaches wherein the scheduling request indicates the artificial intelligence module (learning application, 135, figure 1) based at least in part on a scheduling request resource used to transmit the scheduling request ([0025]; [0029]; [0032]; “…functionality provided by the self-learning application 135 and the SR power saving application 140 may be performed by a single application…”; [0043]; “…self-learning mode of operation may include collecting statistics related to the transmission of a SR…”; teaches the scheduling request (SR) indicates the learning and power saving application based in part on the resources used to transmit the SR). Claims 3, 14, and 26 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang et al. (hereinafter Wang) (U.S. Patent Application Publication # 2019/0373554 A1) in view of Peng et al. (hereinafter Peng) (U.S. Patent Application Publication # 2019/0324805 A1) and WANG et al. (hereinafter Wang2) (U.S. Patent Application Publication # 2020/0229265 A1), and further in view of Zhao et al. (hereinafter Zhao) (U.S. Patent Application Publication # 2022/0046698 A1). Regarding claims 3 and 26, Wang, as modified by Peng and Wang2, discloses transmitting an SR and receiving an uplink grant based on the SR, but may not explicitly disclose wherein the artificial intelligence module comprises a channel state information feedback encoding operation. Nonetheless, in the same field of endeavor, Zhao teaches and suggests wherein the artificial intelligence module comprises a channel state information feedback encoding operation ([0195]; [0200]; teaches including CSI feedback information). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate CSI feedback information as taught by Zhao with the method and apparatus as disclosed by Wang, as modified by Peng and Wang2, for the purpose of indicating whether the receiving terminal needs to send channel state information to the transmitting terminal, as suggested by Zhao. Regarding claim 14, Wang, as modified by Peng and Wang2, discloses transmitting an SR and receiving an uplink grant based on the SR, but may not explicitly disclose wherein the artificial intelligence module indicated by the scheduling request comprises a channel state information feedback encoding operation and the selected artificial intelligence module comprises a channel state information feedback decoding operation. Nonetheless, in the same field of endeavor, Zhao teaches and suggests wherein the artificial intelligence module indicated by the scheduling request comprises a channel state information feedback encoding operation and the selected artificial intelligence module comprises a channel state information feedback decoding operation ([0195]; [0200]; teaches including CSI feedback information). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate CSI feedback information as taught by Zhao with the method and apparatus as disclosed by Wang, as modified by Peng and Wang2, for the purpose of indicating whether the receiving terminal needs to send channel state information to the transmitting terminal, as suggested by Zhao. Claim 23 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang et al. (hereinafter Wang) (U.S. Patent Application Publication # 2019/0373554 A1) in view of Peng et al. (hereinafter Peng) (U.S. Patent Application Publication # 2019/0324805 A1) and WANG et al. (hereinafter Wang2) (U.S. Patent Application Publication # 2020/0229265 A1), and further in view of Larsson et al. (hereinafter Larsson) (U.S. Patent Application Publication # 2015/0289287 A1). Regarding claim 23, Wang, as modified by Peng and Wang2, discloses transmitting an SR and receiving an uplink grant based on the SR, but may not explicitly disclose wherein a size of a downlink resource allocation used to provide the artificial intelligence information corresponding to the artificial intelligence module to the other UE is based at least in part on the artificial intelligence information. Nonetheless, in the same field of endeavor, Larsson further teaches and suggests wherein a size of a downlink resource allocation used to provide the artificial intelligence information corresponding to the artificial intelligence module to the other UE is based at least in part on the artificial intelligence information ([0005]; “…A grant is transmitted on the Physical Downlink Control Channel (PDCCH) and the UE responds with a transmission using the resources specified in the grant and with the size specified in the grant…”; [0030]; teaches a size of the resource allocation based on the information in the scheduling request). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate a size of the resource allocation based on the information in the scheduling request as taught by Larsson with the method and apparatus for transmitting a scheduling request and receiving an uplink grant as disclosed by Wang, as modified by Peng and Wang2, for the purpose of optimizing the use of radio resources, as suggested by Larsson. Claims 31 and 32 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Wang et al. (hereinafter Wang) (U.S. Patent Application Publication # 2019/0373554 A1) in view of Peng et al. (hereinafter Peng) (U.S. Patent Application Publication # 2019/0324805 A1) and WANG et al. (hereinafter Wang2) (U.S. Patent Application Publication # 2020/0229265 A1), and further in view of O’Shea (U.S. Patent Application Publication # 2023/0055213 A1). Regarding claims 31 and 32, Wang, as modified by Peng and Wang2, discloses transmitting an SR and receiving an uplink grant based on the SR, but may not explicitly disclose determining the at least one of the one or more weights or the one or more parameters for the artificial intelligence module based at least in part on an encoder network. Nonetheless, in the same field of endeavor, O’Shea teaches and suggests determining the at least one of the one or more weights or the one or more parameters for the artificial intelligence module based at least in part on an encoder network ([0100]; teaches determining network weights and parameters for machine-learning model based in part on an encoder network). Therefore, it would have been obvious to a person of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to incorporate determining network weights and parameters for machine-learning model based in part on an encoder network as taught by O’Shea with the method and apparatus as disclosed by Wang, as modified by Peng and Wang2, for the purpose of updating a machine learning model based an encoder network, as suggested by O’Shea. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments with respect to claims 1-3, 5-7, 10-15, 17, 18, 20-26, 28, 29, 31, and 32 have been considered but are moot in view of a new ground(s) of rejection. Upon a quality review of the application and further consideration of the claims based on the broadest reasonable interpretation, the new ground(s) of rejection has been made as indicated in the above rejections. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to Applicant’s disclosure. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SUK JIN KANG whose telephone number is (571) 270-1771. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 8am-5pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Chirag Shah can be reached on (571) 272-3144. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative or access to the automated information system, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. Any inquiry of a general nature or relating to the status of this application or proceeding should be directed to the receptionist/customer service whose telephone number is (571) 272-2600. /Suk Jin Kang/ Examiner, Art Unit 2477 December 30, 2025
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 20, 2020
Application Filed
Jul 02, 2022
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 08, 2022
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 08, 2022
Examiner Interview Summary
Oct 05, 2022
Response Filed
Nov 29, 2022
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 17, 2023
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 17, 2023
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 01, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 16, 2023
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 21, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 06, 2023
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 12, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 08, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 30, 2023
Response Filed
Oct 08, 2023
Final Rejection — §103
Nov 07, 2023
Interview Requested
Dec 01, 2023
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 01, 2023
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 15, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 17, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 24, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 30, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 29, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 19, 2024
Interview Requested
Sep 03, 2024
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 03, 2024
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 24, 2024
Response Filed
Dec 28, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 17, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 28, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Sep 11, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 17, 2026
Interview Requested
Mar 23, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 24, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Apr 01, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12588010
Service Information for V2X Service Coordination in Other Frequency Spectrum
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12574767
AUTOMATIC LABELLING OF DATA FOR MACHINE LEARNING ALGORITHM TO DETERMINE CONNECTION QUALITY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12563536
DETECTING INTERFERENCE BETWEEN BASE STATIONS AND MICROWAVE BACKHAUL TRANSCEIVERS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12556241
PRECODING FOR SIDELINK COMMUNICATIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12538244
PRS-SUPPORTING SIDELINK POWER ALLOCATION METHOD, AND APPARATUS, STORAGE MEDIUM, AND TERMINAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

8-9
Expected OA Rounds
67%
Grant Probability
74%
With Interview (+7.0%)
3y 10m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 629 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month