Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 16/988,604

Windmill electrical power system and Torque Enhanced Transmission

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Sep 07, 2020
Examiner
ORTEGA, JOSEPH
Art Unit
2834
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Legacy Ip
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
2y 1m
To Grant
88%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
300 granted / 415 resolved
+4.3% vs TC avg
Strong +16% interview lift
Without
With
+15.7%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Fast prosecutor
2y 1m
Avg Prosecution
22 currently pending
Career history
437
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.6%
-37.4% vs TC avg
§103
31.4%
-8.6% vs TC avg
§102
32.4%
-7.6% vs TC avg
§112
30.1%
-9.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 415 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 11/19/2025 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 01/12/2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. The applicant’s remarks are unclear and appears unresponsive. The examiner suggested new set of Claims. The specification dated 04/17/2023 as reference and amend accordingly to the dated specification suggestion. The drawing objections should be included the suggested specification suggested. Claim Objections All pending Claims are objected to because the Claims dated 01/12/2026 does not match previous Claims dated 05/30/2025. Additionally, some claims appear to have an error stated as “Error! Reference source not found”. The Claims are not properly annotated such as it’s not clear what is amended or added. The examiner suggested new claims to resolve the objections. Appropriate correction is required. Drawings The drawings are objected to as failing to comply with 37 CFR 1.84(p)(5) because they include the following reference character(s) not mentioned in the description: ALL references numbers in the FIGs dated 04/17/2023. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d), or amendment to the specification to add the reference character(s) in the description in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(b) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. The drawings are objected to under 37 CFR 1.83(a). The drawings must show every feature of the invention specified in ALL the claims. The amended specification dated 01/12/2026 is objected as not matching the previous specification dated 10/23/2025. No new matter should be entered. Corrected drawing sheets in compliance with 37 CFR 1.121(d) are required in reply to the Office action to avoid abandonment of the application. Any amended replacement drawing sheet should include all of the figures appearing on the immediate prior version of the sheet, even if only one figure is being amended. The figure or figure number of an amended drawing should not be labeled as “amended.” If a drawing figure is to be canceled, the appropriate figure must be removed from the replacement sheet, and where necessary, the remaining figures must be renumbered and appropriate changes made to the brief description of the several views of the drawings for consistency. Additional replacement sheets may be necessary to show the renumbering of the remaining figures. Each drawing sheet submitted after the filing date of an application must be labeled in the top margin as either “Replacement Sheet” or “New Sheet” pursuant to 37 CFR 1.121(d). If the changes are not accepted by the examiner, the applicant will be notified and informed of any required corrective action in the next Office action. The objection to the drawings will not be held in abeyance. Specification The disclosure is objected to because of the following informalities: Latest specification dated 01/12/2026 does not match previous specification dated 10/23/2025. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. All pending Claims are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. All pending Claims are rejected as failing to define the invention in the manner required by 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, second paragraph. The claim(s) are narrative in form and replete with indefinite language. The structure which goes to make up the device must be clearly and positively specified. The structure must be organized and correlated in such a manner as to present a complete operative device. The claim(s) must be in one sentence form only. The examiner suggests the following Claims: Claims 1-44 are cancelled. 45. (New) A torque-enhanced transmission comprising: a first shaft as an input; a first speed increaser; a first clutch attached to the first speed increaser via the first shaft; a first flywheel coupled to the first clutch via the first shaft; a first auxiliary shaft as a perpendicular shaft coupled to a second shaft; a second clutch; a second speed increaser coupled to the second clutch via the second shaft; a second flywheel coupled to the second speed increaser via the second shaft; an auxiliary second shaft as a perpendicular shaft coupled to a third shaft; a speed decreaser between the third shaft and an output shaft of the torque-enhanced transmission; an auxiliary motor connected to the first, second, or third shaft, the first auxiliary a generator connected to the first shaft, second shaft and third shaft of the torque-enhanced transmission. 46. (New) The torque-enhanced transmission of claim 45, further comprising a system battery connected to the generator. 47. (New) A method of storing, accepting, and discharging energy using the torque-enhanced transmission of claim 45, wherein the torque-enhanced transmission is configured to function as a flywheel by discharging kinetic energy as torque the torque-enhanced transmission through reverse gearing. 48. (New) The torque-enhanced transmission of claim 45, wherein at least one of: the first auxiliary shaft or the second auxiliary shaft is connected to the speed decreaser and configured to transfer kinetic energy back to the torque-enhanced transmission. Allowable Subject Matter Suggested Claims 45-48 are allowed when or if applicant agrees with the suggestions. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH ORTEGA whose telephone number is (469)295-9083. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8 AM - 5 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, TULSIDAS C. PATEL can be reached at (571)272-2098. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSEPH ORTEGA/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2834
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 07, 2020
Application Filed
Oct 12, 2022
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Apr 17, 2023
Response Filed
Jan 24, 2024
Final Rejection — §112
May 30, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 01, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 03, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 12, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jan 17, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 18, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Oct 23, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 19, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 20, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 12, 2026
Response Filed
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12601290
CONVERTING POTENTIAL ENERGY FROM A MIXTURE OF FLUIDS INTO ELECTRIC POWER
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12595780
JOHNSON EJECTOR WATER AND POWER GENERATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12577885
OXYGEN-LED POWER GENERATING SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12580356
METHOD OF ASSEMBLING AN ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR AND AN ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12571373
OFFSHORE WIND TURBINE SYSTEMS AND PROCESSES FOR INSTALLING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
88%
With Interview (+15.7%)
2y 1m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 415 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month