Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 18, 2026
Application No. 17/047,797

ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING COMPOUND AND ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT DEVICE USING THE SAME

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Oct 15, 2020
Examiner
YANG, JAY LEE
Art Unit
1786
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Doosan Solus Co. Ltd.
OA Round
8 (Final)
74%
Grant Probability
Favorable
9-10
OA Rounds
3y 9m
To Grant
77%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 74% — above average
74%
Career Allow Rate
659 granted / 893 resolved
+8.8% vs TC avg
Minimal +3% lift
Without
With
+2.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
78 currently pending
Career history
971
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.1%
-39.9% vs TC avg
§103
52.8%
+12.8% vs TC avg
§102
18.4%
-21.6% vs TC avg
§112
23.2%
-16.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 893 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION This Office Action is in response to the Applicant’s Amendment filed 01/26/26. The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The rejection of Claims 1, 3, 5, 8, and 9 under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Cha et al. 2 (KR 10-2016-0086735) as set forth in the Non-Final Rejection filed 10/27/25 is overcome by the Applicant’s amendments. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 1, 3, 5, 8, and 9 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Goo et al. (KR 10-2013-0140303). Examiner’s Note: The Office has relied on the Machine English translation of KR 10-2013-0140303 (herein referred to as “Goo et al.”) as the English equivalent. Unless otherwise noted, all figure, page, and paragraph numbers referenced herein refer to numbers found in the Machine English translation. Goo et al. discloses the following compound: PNG media_image1.png 174 188 media_image1.png Greyscale (page 16 of Goo et al.) such that L = direct bond, Ar1 = C12 aryl group (biphenyl), and Ar2 = substituted C6 aryl group (9-phenylcarbazolyl-substituted phenyl) of Applicant’s Formula 1-3. Goo et al. discloses the following organic electroluminescent (EL) device: PNG media_image2.png 354 358 media_image2.png Greyscale (page 24 of Goo et al.); its inventive compounds comprise the hole-transporting (“Hole Transfer”) layer and/or the light-emitting (“Emission Material”) layer (pages 8-9). Allowable Subject Matter 6. Claims 6, 7, and 17-20 are allowed. The closest prior art is provided by Cha et al. (WO 2016/204453 A1), which discloses compounds of the following form: PNG media_image3.png 462 391 media_image3.png Greyscale ([0006]) where L1 = direct bond or substituted or unsubstituted arylene group ([0008]); such arylene groups include phenylene and fluorenylene ([0045]-[0047], [0057]); an embodiment is disclosed: PNG media_image4.png 349 426 media_image4.png Greyscale (page 10). However, it is the position of the Office that neither Cha et al. singly nor in combination with any other prior art discloses any of the compounds as recited in the claims, particularly in regards to the nature of the L group of Formula 1-1. Response to Arguments 7. Applicant’s arguments on pages 17-19 with respect to the deficiencies of the previously cited prior art have been considered but are moot in view of the new grounds of rejection as set forth above. Conclusion 8. Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. 9. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAY L YANG whose telephone number is (571)270-1137. The examiner can normally be reached Mon-Fri, 6am-3pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer A Boyd can be reached on 571-272-7783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JAY YANG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 15, 2020
Application Filed
Mar 01, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jun 07, 2023
Response Filed
Aug 17, 2023
Final Rejection — §102
Jan 16, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 17, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 31, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102
May 03, 2024
Response Filed
May 20, 2024
Final Rejection — §102
Aug 23, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 26, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
May 13, 2025
Response Filed
Jun 17, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Sep 19, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 20, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 21, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jan 26, 2026
Response Filed
Apr 07, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604660
ELECTRONIC DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12598906
ORGANIC ELECTROLUMINESCENT MATERIALS AND DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12590101
COMPOUND FOR ORGANIC OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICE, COMPOSITION FOR ORGANIC OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICE AND ORGANIC OPTOELECTRONIC DEVICE AND DISPLAY DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12590085
Organic Light Emitting Compound And Organic Light Emitting Device Including Same
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12588407
ORGANIC LIGHT-EMITTING ELEMENT
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

9-10
Expected OA Rounds
74%
Grant Probability
77%
With Interview (+2.9%)
3y 9m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 893 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month