Office Action Predictor
Last updated: April 17, 2026
Application No. 17/053,212

COMMUNICATION APPARATUS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Nov 05, 2020
Examiner
YANG, ZHAOHUI
Art Unit
2468
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Ntt Docomo, INC.
OA Round
9 (Non-Final)
72%
Grant Probability
Favorable
9-10
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 72% — above average
72%
Career Allow Rate
281 granted / 391 resolved
+13.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +11% lift
Without
With
+11.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
44 currently pending
Career history
435
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.8%
-37.2% vs TC avg
§103
66.5%
+26.5% vs TC avg
§102
18.2%
-21.8% vs TC avg
§112
9.6%
-30.4% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 391 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA .Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 12/17/2025 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 12, 14 and 15 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. This application currently names joint inventors. In considering patentability of the claims the examiner presumes that the subject matter of the various claims was commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the claimed invention(s) absent any evidence to the contrary. Applicant is advised of the obligation under 37 CFR 1.56 to point out the inventor and effective filing dates of each claim that was not commonly owned as of the effective filing date of the later invention in order for the examiner to consider the applicability of 35 U.S.C. 102(b)(2)(C) for any potential 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) prior art against the later invention. Claims 12, 14 and 15 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim; Yuchul et al. US PGPUB 20180309513 A1, in view of CHOI; Kyungjun et al. US PGPUB 20200092880 A1, further in view of ASHRAF; Shehzad Ali et al. US PGPUB 20220174649 A1. Regarding claim 12. Kim teaches A terminal comprising: a receiver (Fig. 3, Radio/Antenna 330/335) that receives assignment information of an uplink resource in downlink; ([0010] the BS may transmit a slot format indicator (SFI) to the UE. The SFI may indicate the transmission direction for each of the plurality of symbols included in one or more slots.) and a transmitter (Fig. 3, Radio/Antenna 330/335) that performs uplink transmission by using the uplink resource, ([0121] In some embodiments, the SFI may indicate any of the uplink-centric slot formats shown in FIG. 9. These slot formats vary in aggregation level, i.e., the number of slots that are combined together to form a continuous uplink region. The main use cases for these uplink-centric slot formats are PUSCH and/or PUCCH transmission.) Kim doesn’t teach wherein the receiver receives data by a sidelink resource, where the data is dynamically allocated, in a sidelink region in a first uplink (UL) slot from another terminal, and the transmitter performs uplink transmission in a second slot adjacent to the first UL slot. wherein the sidelink resource is a resource designated by downlink control information received by the other terminal from a base station for scheduling of sidelink transmission, and wherein the sidelink regions is configured by a high-layer signaling. However, Choi teaches the receiver receives data by a sidelink resource in a sidelink region in a first uplink (UL) slot from another terminal, ([0177] When the slot format of FIG. 11 is informed, the bit size of the slot configuration information in the US-PDCCH may be 3 bits. On the other hand, the format/configuration of the slot is not limited to only DL and UL, and there may be configurations such as DL, UL, any, sidelink, blank, and the like. See Fig. 11 format 1-6) and the transmitter performs uplink transmission in a second slot adjacent to the first UL slot. ([0145] In this case, the GC-PDCCH of the slot (e.g., slot n+k) immediately before the UL-only slot may indicate the slot configuration before the UL-only slot, and the UE may use the slot configuration information of the GC-PDCCH received in the slot (e.g., slot n+k) immediately before the UL-only slot in order to identify whether the slot (e.g., slot n+k) immediately before the UL-only slot is a DL-only slot.) wherein the sidelink resource is a resource designated by downlink control information received by the other terminal from a base station for scheduling of sidelink transmission, ( [0177] When the slot format of FIG. 11 is informed, the bit size of the slot configuration information in the US-PDCCH may be 3 bits. On the other hand, the format/configuration of the slot is not limited to only DL and UL, and there may be configurations such as DL, UL, any, sidelink, blank, and the like. ) and wherein the sidelink regions is configured by a high-layer signaling. ([0126] In order to inform the UE of the slot format through the SFI_GC-PDCCH, the base station may inform the UE of slot formats that can be indicated by the SFI_GC-PDCCH in advance. In this case, the slot formats that can be indicated by the SFI_GC-PDCCH may be provided to the UE using a UE-specific RRC signal.) in order to reduce the signaling overhead by using Symbol indicator value scheme ([0116]) Kim and Choi are analogous art in the same field of endeavor of wireless communication. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person with ordinary skill in the art to modify the method in Choi with the technique of symbol indicator value scheme in order to reduce the signaling overhead. Kim and Choi does not teach Where the data is dynamically allocated. However, Ashraf teaches where the data is dynamically allocated. ([0043] the access node 100 may send DCI indicating allocated radio resources of the PSCCH to be used for transmission of the first SCI and the second SCI, and allocated radio resources of the PSSCH to be used for sending the actual data transmission.) In order to efficiently control SL communication by centralize SL resource allocation ([0043] and [0007]) Kim and Ashraf are analogous art in the same field of endeavor of wireless communication. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person with ordinary skill in the art to modify the method in Kim with technique of centralized SL allocation in Ashraf in order to efficiently control SL communication. Regarding claim 14. Kim teaches A communication system comprising: a terminal (Fig. 2, 106) comprising: a receiver (Fig. 3, Radio/Antenna 330/335) that receives assignment information of an uplink resource in downlink; ([0010] the BS may transmit a slot format indicator (SFI) to the UE. The SFI may indicate the transmission direction for each of the plurality of symbols included in one or more slots.) and and a transmitter (Fig. 3, Radio/Antenna 330/335) that performs uplink transmission by using the uplink resource, ([0121] In some embodiments, the SFI may indicate any of the uplink-centric slot formats shown in FIG. 9. These slot formats vary in aggregation level, i.e., the number of slots that are combined together to form a continuous uplink region. The main use cases for these uplink-centric slot formats are PUSCH and/or PUCCH transmission.) a base station (Fig. 2, Base Station 102) comprising a transmitter (Fig. 4, Radio 430, Communication Chain 432 and Antenna 434) that transmits the assignment information. ([0010] the BS may transmit a slot format indicator (SFI) to the UE. The SFI may indicate the transmission direction for each of the plurality of symbols included in one or more slots.) Kim doesn’t teach wherein the receiver receives data by a sidelink resource, where the data is dynamically allocated, in a sidelink region in a first uplink (UL) slot from another terminal, and the transmitter performs uplink transmission in a second slot adjacent to the first UL slot. wherein the sidelink resource is a resource designated by downlink control information received by the other terminal from a base station for scheduling of sidelink transmission, and wherein the sidelink regions is configured by a high-layer signaling. However, Choi teaches the receiver receives data by a sidelink resource in a sidelink region in a first uplink (UL) slot from another terminal, ([0177] When the slot format of FIG. 11 is informed, the bit size of the slot configuration information in the US-PDCCH may be 3 bits. On the other hand, the format/configuration of the slot is not limited to only DL and UL, and there may be configurations such as DL, UL, any, sidelink, blank, and the like. See Fig. 11 format 1-6) and the transmitter performs uplink transmission in a second slot adjacent to the first UL slot. ([0145] In this case, the GC-PDCCH of the slot (e.g., slot n+k) immediately before the UL-only slot may indicate the slot configuration before the UL-only slot, and the UE may use the slot configuration information of the GC-PDCCH received in the slot (e.g., slot n+k) immediately before the UL-only slot in order to identify whether the slot (e.g., slot n+k) immediately before the UL-only slot is a DL-only slot.) wherein the sidelink resource is a resource designated by downlink control information received by the other terminal from a base station for scheduling of sidelink transmission, ( [0177] When the slot format of FIG. 11 is informed, the bit size of the slot configuration information in the US-PDCCH may be 3 bits. On the other hand, the format/configuration of the slot is not limited to only DL and UL, and there may be configurations such as DL, UL, any, sidelink, blank, and the like. ) and wherein the sidelink regions is configured by a high-layer signaling. ([0126] In order to inform the UE of the slot format through the SFI_GC-PDCCH, the base station may inform the UE of slot formats that can be indicated by the SFI_GC-PDCCH in advance. In this case, the slot formats that can be indicated by the SFI_GC-PDCCH may be provided to the UE using a UE-specific RRC signal.) in order to reduce the signaling overhead by using Symbol indicator value scheme ([0116]) Kim and Choi are analogous art in the same field of endeavor of wireless communication. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person with ordinary skill in the art to modify the method in Choi with the technique of symbol indicator value scheme in order to reduce the signaling overhead. Kim and Choi does not teach Where the data is dynamically allocated. However, Ashraf teaches where the data is dynamically allocated. ([0043] the access node 100 may send DCI indicating allocated radio resources of the PSCCH to be used for transmission of the first SCI and the second SCI, and allocated radio resources of the PSSCH to be used for sending the actual data transmission.) In order to efficiently control SL communication by centralize SL resource allocation ([0043] and [0007]) Kim and Ashraf are analogous art in the same field of endeavor of wireless communication. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person with ordinary skill in the art to modify the method in Kim with technique of centralized SL allocation in Ashraf in order to efficiently control SL communication. Regarding claim 15. Kim taches A communication method executed by a terminal, the communication method comprising: receiving assignment information of an uplink resource in downlink; ([0010] the BS may transmit a slot format indicator (SFI) to the UE. The SFI may indicate the transmission direction for each of the plurality of symbols included in one or more slots.) and performing uplink transmission by using the uplink resource, ([0121] In some embodiments, the SFI may indicate any of the uplink-centric slot formats shown in FIG. 9. These slot formats vary in aggregation level, i.e., the number of slots that are combined together to form a continuous uplink region. The main use cases for these uplink-centric slot formats are PUSCH and/or PUCCH transmission.) Kim does not teach Kim doesn’t teach wherein the receiver receives data by a sidelink resource, where the data is dynamically allocated, in a sidelink region in a first uplink (UL) slot from another terminal, and the terminal performs uplink transmission in a second slot adjacent to the first UL slot. wherein the sidelink resource is a resource designated by downlink control information received by the other terminal from a base station for scheduling of sidelink transmission, and wherein the sidelink regions is configured by a high-layer signaling. However, Choi teaches the terminal receives data by a sidelink resource in a sidelink region in a first uplink (UL) slot from another terminal, ([0177] When the slot format of FIG. 11 is informed, the bit size of the slot configuration information in the US-PDCCH may be 3 bits. On the other hand, the format/configuration of the slot is not limited to only DL and UL, and there may be configurations such as DL, UL, any, sidelink, blank, and the like. See Fig. 11 format 1-6) and the terminal performs uplink transmission in a second slot adjacent to the first UL slot. ([0145] In this case, the GC-PDCCH of the slot (e.g., slot n+k) immediately before the UL-only slot may indicate the slot configuration before the UL-only slot, and the UE may use the slot configuration information of the GC-PDCCH received in the slot (e.g., slot n+k) immediately before the UL-only slot in order to identify whether the slot (e.g., slot n+k) immediately before the UL-only slot is a DL-only slot.) wherein the sidelink resource is a resource designated by downlink control information received by the other terminal from a base station for scheduling of sidelink transmission, ( [0177] When the slot format of FIG. 11 is informed, the bit size of the slot configuration information in the US-PDCCH may be 3 bits. On the other hand, the format/configuration of the slot is not limited to only DL and UL, and there may be configurations such as DL, UL, any, sidelink, blank, and the like. ) and wherein the sidelink regions is configured by a high-layer signaling. ([0126] In order to inform the UE of the slot format through the SFI_GC-PDCCH, the base station may inform the UE of slot formats that can be indicated by the SFI_GC-PDCCH in advance. In this case, the slot formats that can be indicated by the SFI_GC-PDCCH may be provided to the UE using a UE-specific RRC signal.) in order to reduce the signaling overhead by using Symbol indicator value scheme ([0116]) Kim and Choi are analogous art in the same field of endeavor of wireless communication. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person with ordinary skill in the art to modify the method in Choi with the technique of symbol indicator value scheme in order to reduce the signaling overhead. Kim and Choi does not teach Where the data is dynamically allocated. However, Ashraf teaches where the data is dynamically allocated. ([0043] the access node 100 may send DCI indicating allocated radio resources of the PSCCH to be used for transmission of the first SCI and the second SCI, and allocated radio resources of the PSSCH to be used for sending the actual data transmission.) In order to efficiently control SL communication by centralize SL resource allocation ([0043] and [0007]) Kim and Ashraf are analogous art in the same field of endeavor of wireless communication. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person with ordinary skill in the art to modify the method in Kim with technique of centralized SL allocation in Ashraf in order to efficiently control SL communication. Claim 16 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kim and Choi and Ashraf as applied to claim 12 above, and further in view of Gupta; Piyush et al. US PGPUB 20180049143 A1 Regarding claim 16. Kim and Choi and Ashraf teach The terminal as claimed in claim 12, Kim and Choi do not teach wherein a time gap separates a first downlink resource and the sidelink resource of the same slot, and the sidelink resource and a second downlink resource of the adjacent slot. However, Gupta teaches wherein a time gap ([0100] As illustrated in each of FIGS. 9-13, a time gap (e.g., guard interval, guard period, etc.) between adjacent data portions, if any, may enable a device to transition from a listening/receiving state (e.g., during DSS 904 for a non-primary device) to a transmitting state (e.g., during STS 906 for a non-primary device); and/or to transition from a transmitting state (e.g., during STS 906 for a non-primary device) to a listening/receiving state (e.g., during DRS 908 for either a primary or non-primary transmitting device).) separates a first downlink resource and the sidelink resource of the same slot, ([0102] Notably, as illustrated in FIG. 9, the DL burst 902 may be included in the beginning or initial portion of the sidelink-centric slot 900.) and the sidelink resource and a second downlink resource of the adjacent slot. (Fig. 8, see DL burst 810 following sidelink portion 806, with a gap of UL burst 808. On Fig. 9, the time gap are illustrated further in detail). in order to minimize the likelihood of interference with DL/UL control/scheduling information of nominal traffic ([0098]). Kim and Gupta are analogous art in the same field of endeavor of wireless communication. It would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person with ordinary skill in the art to modify the apparatus in Kim with the technique of UL/SL slot sharing in Gupta in order to minimize the likelihood of interference with DL/UL control/scheduling information of nominal traffic. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to ZHAOHUI YANG whose telephone number is (571)270-7527. The examiner can normally be reached 9 AM to 5 PM M-F. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Marcus Smith can be reached on 571 270-1096. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ZHAOHUI YANG/Examiner, Art Unit 2468 /MARCUS SMITH/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2468
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Nov 05, 2020
Application Filed
Nov 05, 2020
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 04, 2022
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 13, 2022
Response Filed
Sep 19, 2022
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 14, 2022
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 25, 2023
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 09, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 14, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 22, 2023
Response Filed
Aug 29, 2023
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 05, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 19, 2024
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 20, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 06, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 14, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 19, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 25, 2024
Response Filed
Oct 15, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
Dec 20, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 21, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 28, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Jun 18, 2025
Response Filed
Sep 12, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Nov 17, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 17, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 20, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 24, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Apr 02, 2026
Response Filed

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12550152
AVAILABLE SLOT DETERMINATION FOR APERIODIC SRS TRIGGERING BASED ON AN UNCONFIGURED DCI CODE POINT
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12543061
BEAM QUALITY ENHANCEMENT TECHNIQUES IN DISCONTINUOUS RECEPTION (DRX) MODE
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12538280
SPATIAL REUSE METHOD AND DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 27, 2026
Patent 12501288
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SELECTING A MACHINE LEARNING MODEL THAT PREDICTS A SUBSCRIBER NETWORK EXPERIENCE IN A GEOGRAPHIC AREA
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Patent 12489505
IMPROVING PRECODING
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 02, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

9-10
Expected OA Rounds
72%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+11.1%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 391 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in for Full Analysis

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month