Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026
Application No. 17/054,233

METHOD FOR DETECTING GUT MICROORGANISM IN A SAMPLE USING NORMAL GUT FLORA AS INTERNAL CONTROL

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Nov 10, 2020
Priority
May 10, 2018 — nonprovisional of PCTKR2018005338
Examiner
WOOLWINE, SAMUEL C
Art Unit
1681
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
Seegene Inc.
OA Round
7 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
7-8
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
81%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allowance Rate
528 granted / 866 resolved
+1.0% vs TC avg
Strong +20% interview lift
Without
With
+20.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
39 currently pending
Career history
905
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
6.1%
-33.9% vs TC avg
§103
37.1%
-2.9% vs TC avg
§102
14.2%
-25.8% vs TC avg
§112
30.1%
-9.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 866 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 03/30/2026 has been entered. Response to Amendment Regarding the Office action mailed 02/04/2026, the rejections set forth therein under 35 USC 103 are withdrawn in view of the amendment. While the claims are free of the prior art, new grounds of rejection are set forth below. Claim Objections Claim 1 objected to because of the following informalities: in the final three lines of the claim, the language “or (b) the (ii) pair of primers comprises” should be “or (b) the (ii) pair of primers for amplifying the endogenous internal control nucleic acid comprises”, in order to match the language of “(a)” in the same section of the claim. Appropriate correction is required. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1, 2, 6, 7, 11 and 14 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 recites “and further using a probing and tagging oligonucleotide (PTO) and capturing and templating oligonucleotide (CTO) for detecting the endogenous internal control nucleic acid”. This language is vague and ambiguous, as the claim does not set forth how these elements are “used” in the method. Appropriate clarification is required. As claims 2, 6, 7, 11 and 14 depend from claim 1, they are rejected for the same reason. Claim 14 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. The term “fast” in claim 14 is a relative term which renders the claim indefinite. The term “fast” is not defined by the claim, the specification does not provide a standard for ascertaining the requisite degree, and one of ordinary skill in the art would not be reasonably apprised of the scope of the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(d): (d) REFERENCE IN DEPENDENT FORMS.—Subject to subsection (e), a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, fourth paragraph: Subject to the following paragraph [i.e., the fifth paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112], a claim in dependent form shall contain a reference to a claim previously set forth and then specify a further limitation of the subject matter claimed. A claim in dependent form shall be construed to incorporate by reference all the limitations of the claim to which it refers. Claim 7 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(d) or pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, 4th paragraph, as being of improper dependent form for failing to further limit the subject matter of the claim upon which it depends, or for failing to include all the limitations of the claim upon which it depends. Claim 7 recites “wherein the normal gut flora is a human normal gut flora”. However, claim 1, from which claim 7 depends, requires the normal gut flora to be selected from Bacteroides spp. or Lactobacillus spp., both of which are human normal gut flora. Therefore, claim 7 does not further limit claim 1. Applicant may cancel the claim(s), amend the claim(s) to place the claim(s) in proper dependent form, rewrite the claim(s) in independent form, or present a sufficient showing that the dependent claim(s) complies with the statutory requirements. Conclusion Claims 1, 2, 6, 7, 11 and 14 are free of the prior art but rejected for other reasons noted above. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to SAMUEL C WOOLWINE whose telephone number is (571)272-1144. The examiner can normally be reached 9am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, GARY BENZION can be reached at 571-272-0782. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /SAMUEL C WOOLWINE/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1681
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 12 earlier events
Jun 05, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Oct 30, 2025
Response Filed
Feb 04, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Mar 30, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 15, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 19, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 29, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12736529
STREPTAVIDIN-COATED SOLID PHASES WITH A MEMBER OF A BINDING PAIR
5y 4m to grant Granted Sep 15, 2026
Patent 12716095
METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR MEASURING MULTIPLEX RNA EXPRESSION
3y 5m to grant Granted Aug 25, 2026
Patent 12704505
METHODS AND KITS FOR DETECTING TARGET SUBSTANCES
5y 10m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12680919
METHODS TO OBTAIN A BIOLOGICAL SAMPLE REPRESENTATIVE OF A PASSENGER CABIN ON AN AIRCRAFT AUTOMATICALLY FROM THE COLLECTOR DEVICE
4y 8m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12680922
SPATIAL-DEPENDENT ANALYSIS OF BIOLOGICAL MATERIAL FROM INTACT TISSUE SAMPLES
3y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
81%
With Interview (+20.4%)
3y 7m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 866 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month