Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/076,228

BLOOD SAMPLE GUIDING INSTRUMENT AND BLOOD TEST KIT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Oct 21, 2020
Examiner
MELHUS, BENJAMIN S
Art Unit
3791
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Fujifilm Corporation
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
61%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 5m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 61% of resolved cases
61%
Career Allow Rate
234 granted / 381 resolved
-8.6% vs TC avg
Strong +44% interview lift
Without
With
+43.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 5m
Avg Prosecution
58 currently pending
Career history
439
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
13.7%
-26.3% vs TC avg
§103
35.5%
-4.5% vs TC avg
§102
20.6%
-19.4% vs TC avg
§112
22.7%
-17.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 381 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 11/26/25 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 14 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(2) as being anticipated by Ivosevic (US 20190216380 A1). For claim(s) 14, Ivosevic teaches A blood sample guiding instrument [100] used in a blood test kit, the blood sample guiding instrument comprising: a cylindrical body [12] in which a first opening [opening of 12 nearest 30 and 26] , which is configured on a first side of the cylindrical body, [Fig(s). 22-31] and a second opening, [opening of 12 opposite 30 and 26] which is configured on a second side of the cylindrical body, the second side of the cylindrical body opposite to the first side of the cylindrical body, communicating with the first opening are defined and which comes into contact with a finger; and a clamping portion [36] that is attached to an outer circumferential surface of the cylindrical body, clamps a finger, and presses the cylindrical body against the finger, [Fig(s). 22-31] wherein the clamping portion includes a support member, [20] and at least two binding members [38] that are disposed to be spaced from each other, the support member is configured to support a palm side of the finger, and extends from one side of the outer circumferential surface of the cylindrical body in a direction away from a center axis of the cylindrical body, [Fig(s). 22-31] each of the at least two binding members is configured to bind the finger from one side surface of the finger to another side surface of the finger via a back of the finger, and is positioned on and extends from a third side [side nearest / including 38] of the outer circumferential surface of the cylindrical body in the direction away from the center axis of the cylindrical body, [38 extending away from central axis of 20] the third side of the cylindrical body configured between the first side of the cylindrical body and the second side of the cylindrical body, [e.g., 38 between any two opposing sides of 20] and in a state where the finger is bound by the at least two binding members, the outer circumferential surface of the cylindrical body comes into contact with the one side surface of the finger. [Fig(s). 22-31] Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 1, 4-5, and 10-13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ivosevic in view of Sei (US 20110118568 A1). For claim 1, Ivosevic teaches A blood sample guiding instrument used in a blood test kit, the blood sample guiding instrument comprising: a cylindrical body [12] in which a first opening and a second opening communicating with the first opening are defined and which comes into contact with a finger; [Figs. 2-3, Figs. 22-31] and a clamping portion [36] that is attached to an outer circumferential surface of the cylindrical body, clamps a finger, and presses the cylindrical body against the finger, [Figs. 2-3, Figs. 22-31] wherein the clamping portion includes a support member, [20] and at least two binding members [38] that are disposed to be spaced from each other, the support member is configured to support a palm side of the finger, and extends from one side of the outer circumferential surface of the cylindrical body in a direction away from a center axis of the cylindrical body, [Figs. 2-3, Figs. 22-31] each of the at least two binding members is configured to bind the finger from one side surface of the finger to another side surface of the finger via a back of the finger, and extends from the one side of the outer circumferential surface of the cylindrical body in the direction away from the center axis of the cylindrical body, [Figs. 2-3, Figs. 22-31] in a state where the finger is bound by the at least two binding members, the outer circumferential surface of the cylindrical body comes into contact with the one side surface of the finger. [Figs. 2-3, Figs. 22-31] For claim(s) 1, Ivosevic fails to teach cut-out portions and a complimentary bar-shaped member. Sei teaches a blood sample guiding instrument [abstract] comprising a finger holder [36] forming a cut-out portion [88a17076228] and a bar-shaped member [86a] on a distal end side [Fig(s). 1-2] of binding members [86, 88] which is configured to fit into the cut-out portion such that the holder surrounds the entire finger [F] while in use. [Fig(s). 1] It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill at the time the invention was filed to modify the device of Ivosevic to incorporate the bar-shaped member and cut-out portions of Sei in order to ensure the device is securely attached to the finger during use. As motivated by Sei ¶8. For claim 2, Ivosevic teaches The blood sample guiding instrument according to claim 1, wherein the first opening of the cylindrical body is larger than the second opening, and at least a part of an inner circumferential surface of the cylindrical body forms a tapered surface. [any one or more of openings as in Figs. 6-7 and Fig. 12] For claim 4, Ivosevic teaches The blood sample guiding instrument according to claim 1, wherein the binding member adjusts a clamping force for the finger. [¶¶65-67] For claim 5, Ivosevic teaches The blood sample guiding instrument according to claim 1, wherein the binding member is provided at a positioning portion provided on the outer circumferential surface of the cylindrical body. [Figs. 1-7] For claim 10, Ivosevic teaches The blood sample guiding instrument according to claim 1, wherein a shape of a part of the cylindrical body which comes into contact with the finger is a curved shape protruding toward a finger side in a top view. [Figs. 2-3, Figs. 22-31] For claim 11, Ivosevic teaches The blood sample guiding instrument according to claim 1, wherein each of the at least two binding members has a thinned portion which is formed by partially thinning a thickness of each of the at least two binding members, and each of the at least two binding members is configured to be deformable starting from the thinned portion. [Figs. 1-7, ¶¶65-67] For claim 12, Ivosevic teaches The blood sample guiding instrument according to claim 1, wherein the support member has a fitting part [40] configured to detachably fit with each of the at least two binding members, on an end part of the support member. For claim(s) 13, Ivosevic teaches The blood sample guiding instrument according to claim 1, wherein the clamping portion is configured to clamp the finger where the finger is punctured from a side, when the blood sample guiding instrument is in use. [Figs. 2-3, Figs. 22-31] Claim(s) 6 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ivosevic in view of Sei and Ikegami (US 6050956 A). For claim(s) 6, Ivosevic fails to teach the cylindrical body having water repellency. Ikegami teaches a blood sampling device with a water repellent cylindrical body. [col. 3 ll. 10-30] It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill at the time the invention was filed to modify the cylindrical body of Ivosevic to incorporate the water repellency of Ikegami in order to reduce the chance of blood sticking to a surface other than the collection container. As motivated by Ikegami col. 3 ll. 10-30. Claim(s) 7-8 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ivosevic in view of Sei and DeVaughn (US 5662127 A). Examiner notes: for brevity, economy, and clarity of reading, select of the claims are addressed jointly herein when instances of limitations with verbatim or near-verbatim similarity are recited in the body of differently numbered claims. For claim(s) 7-8, Ivosevic teaches The blood sample guiding instrument according to claim 1, further comprising, on a second opening side of the cylindrical body, a connecting portion [26] that is connected to an opening of a storing instrument. [16] For claim(s) 7-8, Ivosevic fails to teach the storing instrument storing a diluent solution. However, Ivosevic does generally suggest ensuring sample sterility in ¶85 and ¶107. DeVaughn teaches a blood sample storing instrument [29] which stores a diluent solution [col. 10 ll. 10-20]. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill at the time the invention was filed to modify the blood collector (storing instrument) of Ivosevic to incorporate the diluent solution (i.e., buffer, pH indicator, enzyme inhibitor) of DeVaughn (i.e., to add the solution of DeVaughn into the storage tube of Ivosevic) in order to aid in blood sample testing and reduce potential contamination of the blood sample. As motivated by Ivosevic ¶85, ¶87, Devaughn col. 10 ll. 10-20. Claim(s) 9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Ivosevic in view of Sei, DeVaughn and Olson (US 20180353952 A1). For claim(s) 9, Ivosevic in view of DeVaughn is silent regarding a separating instrument that separates the blood plasma. Olson teaches that many blood tests require plasma to be separated out of a blood sample and that such an effect can be achieved by centrifugation or filtration. [¶3] It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill at the time the invention was filed to modify the testing kit of Ivosevic and DeVaughn to incorporate a centrifuge or filter as taught by Olson in order to aid in separating out blood plasma for testing of a blood specimen. As motivated by Olson ¶3. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the prior art have been considered but are moot because the arguments do not apply to the new combination of references being used in the current rejection. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to BENJAMIN S MELHUS whose telephone number is (571)272-5342. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday | 9:00 AM - 5:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Robert Chen can be reached on 571-272-3672. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /BENJAMIN S MELHUS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3791
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Oct 21, 2020
Application Filed
Oct 07, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jan 12, 2024
Response Filed
May 08, 2024
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Aug 14, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 15, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Apr 30, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 22, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Oct 29, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 29, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 26, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 10, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12599333
MULTI-AXIAL JOINT LAXITY TESTING APPARATUS AND METHOD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12588837
CONTINUOUS ANALYTE SENSOR WITH MAGNETIC ACTIVATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12514468
PATIENT POSITION MONITORING METHODS AND SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12502142
SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DETECTING WORSENING HEART FAILURE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Patent 12484807
Wearable Sensor, Perspiration Analysis Device and Method
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 02, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
61%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+43.5%)
3y 5m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 381 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month