Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/102,585

GRAPHENE FOAM-BASED PROTECTIVE LAYER FOR AN ANODE-LESS ALKALI METAL BATTERY

Final Rejection §103
Filed
Nov 24, 2020
Examiner
ESSEX, STEPHAN J
Art Unit
1727
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Global Graphene Group Inc.
OA Round
8 (Final)
66%
Grant Probability
Favorable
9-10
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
50%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 66% — above average
66%
Career Allowance Rate
455 granted / 692 resolved
+0.8% vs TC avg
Minimal -16% lift
Without
With
+-16.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
19 currently pending
Career history
718
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
87.5%
+47.5% vs TC avg
§102
5.5%
-34.5% vs TC avg
§112
2.9%
-37.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 692 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION The applicant’s amendment filed on March 10, 2026 was received. Claims 1 and 18 were amended. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-3, 5-7 and 9-19 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhamu et al. (hereinafter “Zhamu”) (U.S. Pub. No. 2016/0043384A1, already of record) in view of in view of Pedrós et al. (hereinafter “Pedrós”) (U.S. Pub. No. 2017/0237075A1, already of record) and Choi et al. (hereinafter “Choi”) (U.S. Pub. No. 2020/0067075A1, already of record). Regarding claims 1, 3, 5-7 and 18, Zhamu teaches a lithium battery containing an anode, a cathode, and an electrolyte in ionic contact with the anode and the cathode (see paragraph 51). The electrolyte may be a non-aqueous electrolyte or an ionic liquid electrolyte and may be retained at least partly within a porous separator (see paragraphs 85 and 86). The anode includes an anode layer composition wherein an anode active material is naturally lodged in pores (pores and pore walls) of a graphene foam, wherein the graphene foam exhibits an elastic property (reversibly compressible graphene foam) in that the solid portion of the foam can be compressed to tightly embrace anode active material particles when an anode layer is made. When individual particles expand upon Li intercalation, the volume expansion is accommodated by local cell walls, without inducing a volume change of the entire anode layer. During the subsequent discharge cycle, these particles shrink; yet the local cell walls shrink or snap back in a congruent manner, maintaining a good contact between cell walls and the particles (see paragraph 40). As an anode active material, particles or lithium or a lithium alloy may be used (see paragraph 93). The anode layer composition may be provided in contact with an anode current collector (see paragraph 52). As an anode current collector, a sheet of copper foil may be used (see paragraph 87). Zhamu does not explicitly teach a recoverable elastic deformation or reversible compressibility greater than 5%, however, one of ordinary skill in the art would expect the graphene foam of Zhamu, which is sufficiently elastic to accommodate volume expansion and shrinkage of the particles of the anode active material during a battery charge-discharge cycle to avoid an expansion of the anode layer (see paragraph 41), to exhibit the claimed recoverably elastic deformation or reversible compressibility. Zhamu is silent as to a polymer that is disposed between said graphene foam and said electrolyte, impregnated into said pores, or coated on or bonded to surfaces of said pore walls, wherein said polymer comprises an elastomer, an elastic polymer, an electron-conducting polymer, an ion-conducting polymer, or a combination thereof. Pedrós teaches a hierarchical structure comprising an open-cell graphene foam or graphene-like foam, wherein the graphene foam or graphene-like foam is coated with a conductive nanoporous spongy structure and wherein at least 10% v/v of the hollow of the pores of the graphene foam or graphene-like foam is filled with the conductive nanoporous spongy structure (see paragraph 33). In a particular embodiment, the conductive nanoporous spongy structure comprises a conductive polymer (see paragraph 41). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have adapted the conductive nanoporous spongy structure of Pedrós to the graphene foam of Zhamu because Pedrós teaches the intimate contact between the open-cell graphene foam or graphene-like foam and the conductive nanoporous spongy structure offers a low internal resistance enabling a rapid charge transport to the collector through the nanopores of the conductive spongy structure (see paragraph 12). Choi teaches that is known in the art to utilize poly(3-alkylthiophene) as an electron conducting polymer in anode protective layer (see paragraphs 49, 54 and 55). This is understood to encompass poly(3-hexylthiophene) and poly(3-octylthiophene) as claimed, as a hexyl group and an octyl group are each exemplary alkyl groups. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to utilized the poly(3-alkylthiophene) electron conducting polymer of Choi in the conductive nanoporous spongy structure of Pedrós because the selection of a known material, which is based upon its suitability for the intended use, is within the ambit of one of ordinary skill in the art. See In re Leshin, 125 USPQ 416 (CCPA 1960) (see MPEP § 2144.07). Regarding claim 2, Zhamu teaches that the graphene foam includes sheets/platelets of single-layer and multi-layer (typically less than 10 layers) pristine graphene, graphene oxide, reduced graphene oxide (RGO), graphene fluoride, graphene chloride, graphene bromide, graphene iodide, hydrogenated graphene, nitrogenated graphene, chemically functionalized graphene, and doped graphene. Pristine graphene has essentially 0% oxygen. RGO typically has an oxygen content of 0.001%-5% by weight. Graphene oxide can have 0.001%-50% by weight of oxygen. Other than pristine graphene, all the graphene materials have 0.001%-50% by weight of non-carbon elements (see paragraph 24). The pore walls contain stacked graphene planes having an inter-plane spacing d.sub.002 from 0.3354 nm to 0.36 nm as measured by X-ray diffraction (see paragraph 46). Regarding claim 9, because the conductive nanoporous spongy structure of Pedrós is porous, one of ordinary skill in the art would expect the pores of the conductive nanoporous spongy structure to be infiltrated by the electrolyte of Zhamu, which, as an electrolyte for a lithium secondary battery, typically contains lithium salt dissolved therein. Lithium salts such as LiPF6, LiBF4 and LiAsF6 are among those most commonly used in the art. Regarding claim 10, Zhamu teaches that the solid graphene foam in the anode layer typically has a density from 0.01 to 1.7 g/cm3, a specific surface area from 50 to 2,000 m2/g, a thermal conductivity of at least 100 W/mK per unit of specific gravity, and/or an electrical conductivity no less than 1,000 S/cm per unit of specific gravity (see paragraph 42). In a preferred embodiment, the graphene foam has a thermal conductivity of at least 250 W/mK per unit of specific gravity, and/or an electrical conductivity no less than 2,500 S/cm per unit of specific gravity (see paragraph 48). Regarding claim 11, Zhamu teaches that the solid graphene foam in the anode layer typically has a density from 0.01 to 1.7 g/cm3, a specific surface area from 50 to 2,000 m2/g, and pores having a pore size from 2 nm to 100 nm (see paragraphs 42 and 46). Regarding claim 12, Zhamu teaches that the graphene foam may be composed of a pristine graphene material having essentially zero percent of non-carbon elements (see paragraph 41). The stacked graphene planes of the graphene foam may have an inter-graphene spacing less than 0.336 nm (see paragraph 49). Regarding claim 13, Zhamu teaches stacked graphene planes having an inter-graphene spacing less than 0.336 nm and a mosaic spread value no greater than 0.7 (see paragraph 49). Regarding claim 14, Zhamu teaches that the pore walls contain a 3D network of interconnected graphene planes (see paragraph 50). Regarding claims 15 and 16, Zhamu teaches that the anode active material may be prelithiated such that the anode active material that is intercalated or inserted with a desired amount of lithium before this anode active material is introduced into the foam pores, or before this anode active material is mixed with the graphene material to form a foamed structure (see paragraph 43). Zhamu further teaches that particles of Li or Li alloy may be utilized as an extra lithium source to compensate for the loss of Li ions that are otherwise supplied only from the cathode active material (see paragraph 93). Regarding claim 17, Zhamu teaches that the solid graphene foam may comprise boron-doped graphene (see paragraph 90). Zhamu further teaches a compression step to reduce a thickness, pore size, or porosity level of the sheet of graphene foam (see paragraph 63). Regarding claim 19, Zhamu teaches that the solid graphene foam may comprise boron-doped graphene (see paragraph 90). Zhamu further teaches a compression step to reduce a thickness, pore size, or porosity level of the sheet of graphene foam (see paragraph 63). Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 1-3, 5-7 and 9-19 have been considered but are no longer relevant to the current rejection(s). Conclusion THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to STEPHAN J ESSEX whose telephone number is (571)270-7866. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday, 8:30 am - 6:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Barbara Gilliam can be reached at (571) 272-1330. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /STEPHAN J ESSEX/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1727
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 14 earlier events
Jan 10, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 24, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 24, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 24, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 27, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Mar 10, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 17, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12683160
OLIVINE COMPOSITE CATHODE MATERIAL, PREPARATION METHOD AND APPLICATION THEREOF, AND LITHIUM-ION BATTERY
1y 10m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12676327
METHOD FOR OPERATING A FUEL CELL SYSTEM, AND CONTROL DEVICE
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 07, 2026
Patent 12620628
ALCOHOL-BASED ELECTROLYTES FOR HIGHLY REVERSIBLE ZN METAL BATTERIES
4y 5m to grant Granted May 05, 2026
Patent 12603296
CLAD CURRENT COLLECTORS INCLUDING THERMAL INTERFACE LAYER FOR BIPOLAR SOLID-STATE BATTERIES
3y 8m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603304
FUEL CELL AND MOBILE UNIT
2y 8m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

9-10
Expected OA Rounds
66%
Grant Probability
50%
With Interview (-16.3%)
3y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 692 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month