Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/167,596

Method and Device for Reporting Capability

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Feb 04, 2021
Examiner
HENSON, JAMAAL R
Art Unit
2411
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd.
OA Round
8 (Final)
84%
Grant Probability
Favorable
9-10
OA Rounds
2y 6m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 84% — above average
84%
Career Allow Rate
673 granted / 798 resolved
+26.3% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 6m
Avg Prosecution
54 currently pending
Career history
852
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
3.8%
-36.2% vs TC avg
§103
41.9%
+1.9% vs TC avg
§102
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
§112
22.4%
-17.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 798 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Disposition of Claims With the Applicants submission dated 10/17/2025, the status of the claims are: claims 1, 3, 6, 8-9, 12, 14, 16, 19, and 21, are pending examination; claims 2, 4-5, 7, 10, 11, 13, 15, 17-18, and 20, have been cancelled; and no new claims have been added. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112: The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention. Claim(s) 1, 3, 6, 8-9, 12, 14, 16, 19, and 21, are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), first paragraph, as failing to comply with the enablement requirement. The claim(s) contains subject matter which was not described in the specification in such a way as to enable one skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and/or use the invention. With regard to the independent claim 1, 8, and 14, the claims have been amended to recite, in part: “acquiring, by the terminal device, capability grouping information, wherein the capability grouping information comprise a plurality of capability groups and capabilities comprised in each of the capability groups and; acquiring, by the terminal device, the capability grouping information comprises: receiving a Non-Access Stratum (NAS) signaling sent from the network device by the terminal device, wherein the NAS signaling carries the capability grouping information”. While the applicants specification has written description support for sending the capability grouping information to the UE via NAS signaling, this feature is not adequately discussed in the specification, such that the reader could make and or use the invention without undue experimentation. At the time of filing the use of NAS signaling to send a plurality of capability grouping information was not a standard in the art, as the attach accept used in (4G) or the registration accept used in (5G) were not configured to transmit a table or list of a plurality of capabilities configured in capability groups for the UE to select from. For example, the 4G and 5G messages are used for mobility management, NAS security, paging, or NAS signaling features. When reviewing the PG PUB (US 2021/0160686 A1) the specification does disclose using NAS or AS signaling carrying the capability grouping information, but recites the features at a very high level, which would cause a need for undue experimentation for the reasons given above. For example the PG PUB recites, “receive the NAS signaling or the AS signaling sent from the network device. The NAS signaling and the AS signaling may carry the capability grouping information.”. The question then becomes how this information is conveyed to the UE because, as discussed above, the NAS signaling known at the time was not used for sending capability grouping information and was instead used for security, mobility, and others as discussed above. For example, Kim (2019/0335532 A1), describes a NAS attach request and NAS attach response, par.[0320 – 0345] which are known in the art as NAS signaling messages and are well-known in the art. The prior art also discloses the use of NAS signaling during the Attach Request to send capability information to the network, see Kim et al. (US 2015/0056986 A1), par.[0155]. Because the use of NAS signaling from the network for capability grouping information is not discussed with any particularity in the applicants specification utilizing unknown NAS signaling to convey a complex capability table as an embedded structure within an NAS message, which is not specifically disclosed which in the specification, was not originally supported in 3GPP, and would require specific and careful design to implement. Thus, the claims are rejected for lack of enablement because the reader would have to perform undue amounts of experimentation in order to make and/or use the invention described. Claims 3, 6, 8-9, 12, 16, 19, and 21, are rejected for their dependency on the independent claims and for failing to cure the deficiencies therein. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) 10/17/2025 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion Shah (US 6,029,065) “Remote Feature Code Programming for Mobile Stations” Pandya et al. (US 2015/0193219 A1) “Flexible Feature Deployment Strategy” Chai et al. (US 2009/0111467 A1) “Method for Reporting the Device Capability Information and Terminal Device” Li (US 2011/0319069 A1) “Apparatuses and Methods for Mobile Capability Signaling” Tabatabaei Yazdi et al. (US 2014/0098756 A1) “Apparatus and Methods for Improved User Equipment (UE) Capability Signaling” Palm et al. (US 2016/0262053 A1) “Node and Method for Carrier Aggregation Compatibility Reporting of a Wireless Device” Figures 8a and 9a. Kim et al. (US 2015/0327269 A1) “Method and Apparatus for Transmitting and Receiving UE Capability Information in Mobile Communications System” Hsu et al. (US 2016/0242072 A1) “Handling Over-Sized Call Setup Messages” Edge et al. (US 2007/0224990 A1) “Extended Capability Transfer Between a User Equipment and a Wireless Network” Ke (US 2021/0160685 A1) “Capability Management Method and Communication Device” Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JAMAAL HENSON whose telephone number is (571)272-5339. The examiner can normally be reached M-Thu: 7:30 am - 6:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Derrick Ferris can be reached at (571)272-3123. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. JAMAAL HENSON Primary Examiner Art Unit 2411 /JAMAAL HENSON/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2411
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Feb 04, 2021
Application Filed
Aug 29, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Dec 05, 2023
Response Filed
Jan 21, 2024
Final Rejection — §112
Mar 19, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 25, 2024
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 25, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 25, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
May 02, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
May 13, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Aug 15, 2024
Response Filed
Sep 24, 2024
Final Rejection — §112
Nov 19, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 25, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Dec 20, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 04, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 14, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Mar 19, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 23, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Jun 24, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 23, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 29, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Oct 17, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 10, 2025
Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604362
DISCONTINUOUS RECEPTION CONFIGURATION FOR SIDELINK COMMUNICATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12581456
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR TRANSMITTING AND RECEIVING WIRELESS SIGNAL IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574853
SCELL PREPARATION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Patent 12563636
METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR OPERATING UE RELATED TO TRANSMISSION OF DATA WITH DIFFERENT SL DRX CONFIGURATIONS IN WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12557173
EDRX SELECTION AND CONFIGURATION HANDLING
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

9-10
Expected OA Rounds
84%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+4.5%)
2y 6m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 798 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month