Prosecution Insights
Last updated: July 17, 2026
Application No. 17/177,854

ANCHOR DELIVERY SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §101
Filed
Feb 17, 2021
Priority
Mar 14, 2013 — continuation of 13/830,684 +1 more
Examiner
LAUER, CHRISTINA C
Art Unit
3771
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Teleflex Life Sciences LLC
OA Round
7 (Non-Final)
68%
Grant Probability
Favorable
7-8
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 68% — above average
68%
Career Allowance Rate
462 granted / 675 resolved
-1.6% vs TC avg
Strong +15% interview lift
Without
With
+15.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 9m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
725
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.4%
-39.6% vs TC avg
§103
86.1%
+46.1% vs TC avg
§102
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
§112
1.8%
-38.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 675 resolved cases

Office Action

§101
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 4/20/26 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, filed 4/20/26 with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1-20 under 35 USC 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Cappiello et al. discloses a multi-actuated trigger 6208 for advancing tube 6804 a first actuation of the trigger advances the tube a fixed distance with respect to the elongate body 6801 and a second actuation of the trigger deploys the needle further than the leading end (figures 69-71) the distances may be controlled by changing the dimensions of the device. Examiner notes stopping before it contacts the body tissue is functional language and the device may be configured to perform this function depending upon the placement of distance from tissue. However, Cappiello et al. is an intrauterine device inserted that uses a tube based insertion mechanism and fails to disclose a needle assembly and scoped needle start position for advancing a needle for piercing through tissue, but instead is designed against perforation (paragraph 0219). Therefore, it would not be obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art to modify the needle assembly of Cheng et al. with the trigger assembly of Cappiello et al., as they are directed toward incompatible devices for different procedures and Cappiello et al. does not comprise a needle that pierces through tissue with the second trigger actuation or at all. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made under 35 USC 101 as discussed below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 101 35 U.S.C. 101 reads as follows: Whoever invents or discovers any new and useful process, machine, manufacture, or composition of matter, or any new and useful improvement thereof, may obtain a patent therefor, subject to the conditions and requirements of this title. Section 33(a) of the America Invents Act reads as follows: Notwithstanding any other provision of law, no patent may issue on a claim directed to or encompassing a human organism. Claims 1-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 101 and section 33(a) of the America Invents Act as being directed to or encompassing a human organism. See also Animals - Patentability, 1077 Off. Gaz. Pat. Office 24 (April 21, 1987) (indicating that human organisms are excluded from the scope of patentable subject matter under 35 U.S.C. 101). Claim 1 discloses “advances the needle…stopping before it contacts body tissue” on lines 10-11. Examiner notes this language should be “advances the needle…configured for stopping before it contacts body tissue”. Claim 1 discloses “deploys the needle further beyond the leading end and through the body tissue” on lines 13-14. Examiner notes this language should be “deploys the needle further beyond the leading end and configured to go through the body tissue”. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHRISTINA C LAUER whose telephone number is (571)270-5418. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Thursday 7:00 AM-4:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Darwin Erezo can be reached at (571) 272-4695. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /CHRISTINA C LAUER/ Examiner, Art Unit 3771
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 11 earlier events
Jun 11, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 13, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 17, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101
Sep 17, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 19, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §101
Apr 20, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 22, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §101 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12678167
LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE CLOSURE IMPLANT
2y 9m to grant Granted Jul 14, 2026
Patent 12667359
EXPANDABLE DEVICES FOR TREATING BODY LUMENS
3y 6m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Patent 12661118
METHODS AND APPARATUS FOR MAGNET-INDUCED COMPRESSION ANASTOMOSIS BETWEEN ADJACENT ORGANS
3y 4m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12661125
ROBOTIC ASSISTED CLIP APPLIER
3y 2m to grant Granted Jun 23, 2026
Patent 12636014
METHOD FOR TREATING SCALP ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA USING MICRO VASCULAR PLUG
2y 11m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
68%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+15.1%)
3y 9m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 675 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month