Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/202,217

PROSTHETIC HEART VALVE DEVICES, PROSTHETIC MITRAL VALVES AND ASSOCIATED SYSTEMS AND METHODS

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Mar 15, 2021
Priority
Oct 19, 2011 — provisional 61/549,044 +5 more
Examiner
GHERBI, SUZETTE JAIME J
Art Unit
3774
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Twelve, Inc.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
85%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 85% — above average
85%
Career Allowance Rate
1166 granted / 1373 resolved
+14.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+8.8%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
20 currently pending
Career history
1403
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.8%
-39.2% vs TC avg
§103
49.5%
+9.5% vs TC avg
§102
13.4%
-26.6% vs TC avg
§112
4.3%
-35.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1373 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application is being examined under the pre-AIA first to invent provisions. Response to Arguments Applicant’s remarks with respect to claim(s) 165-168, 171-173, 176-180 have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: (a) A patent may not be obtained though the invention is not identically disclosed or described as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the subject matter sought to be patented and the prior art are such that the subject matter as a whole would have been obvious at the time the invention was made to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which said subject matter pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim 165-168, 173 are rejected under pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 103(a) as being unpatentable over Gross et al. 2014/0324164. Gross et al. discloses the invention as claimed comprising: A prosthetic heart valve device for implantation at a native heart valve, the prosthetic heart valve device comprising: a frame; a prosthetic valve coupled to the frame (see [0406 and 0572] which discloses a prosthetic valve 1120 and a wire frame); and a sealing member (this is considered to be cover 1128) attached to a surface of the frame. Gross et al. discloses that the material that is placed on the outer surface of the prosthetic valve may be a material such a PET). wherein the sealing member includes tissue engaging elements comprising metallic or polymeric wires or fibers that are sufficiently rigid and shaped to penetrate tissue at the native heart valve, wherein the metallic or polymeric wires or fibers are woven into material of the sealing member. It is obvious to one having ordinary skill in the art that PET is a polyester and it is further obvious that polyester materials are woven fabrics thus may be interpreted as the tissue engaging elements as claimed and are capable of performing the functions as claimed. 5. Regarding claim 166, see fig. 31and [0162] which describes that the prosthetic heart valve frame comprises an outer anchoring member (e.g. support 22) and an inner valve support (150), wherein the prosthetic valve is coupled within the inner valve support this may be check valve elements as disclosed). 6. Regarding claims 167 and 173, see figures 31 and [0125] and cover 64. The intended use recitation language “is configured to engage with tissue of the native heart valve and is configured to deform to absorb forces from the native heart valve such that the inner valve support remains sufficiently stable such that the prosthetic valve remains competent when the outer anchoring member is deformed” carries no weight in the absence of any distinguishing structure. Gross et al. discloses the structure as claimed and is thus capable of performing the functions. Allowable Subject Matter 7. Claims 171-172 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim, but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. 8. Claims 176-180 are allowed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Suzette Gherbi whose telephone number is (571)272- 4751. The examiner can normally be reached on Monday-Friday 7:00am-3:00pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http:/Avww.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner's supervisor, Melanie Tyson can be reached on 571-272-9062. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent- center for more information about Patent Center and https:/Awww.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197. /SUZETTE J GHERBI/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3774 February 17, 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 5 earlier events
Jun 10, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 11, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 25, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 16, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 04, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Feb 02, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 09, 2026
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 19, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12636141
Covered Stent
3y 0m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12636171
FENESTRATED DUODENAL STENT
2y 10m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12636145
Method for the production of crosslinked and optionally shaped tissue with selective adjustment of thickness, shape and/or flexibility
3y 1m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12629244
TISSUE EXPANDER FOR BREAST RECONSTRUCTION CAPABLE OF MMP SENSOR-BASED REAL-TIME CAPSULAR CONTRACTURE MONITORING AND TREATMENT, AND PATIENT INFORMATION SYSTEM LINKED THERETO
3y 6m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12622780
PROSTHETIC HEART VALVE
3y 7m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
85%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+8.8%)
2y 5m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1373 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month