Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/206,283

MODEL VEHICLE STATE DETECTION AND DETERMINATION METHOD AND SYSTEM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Mar 19, 2021
Examiner
LAUGHLIN, CHARLES S
Art Unit
2846
Tech Center
2800 — Semiconductors & Electrical Systems
Assignee
Traxxas L P
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 2m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allow Rate
284 granted / 372 resolved
+8.3% vs TC avg
Moderate +10% lift
Without
With
+10.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 2m
Avg Prosecution
42 currently pending
Career history
414
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
52.0%
+12.0% vs TC avg
§102
33.7%
-6.3% vs TC avg
§112
10.2%
-29.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 372 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 8/14/25 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claim 1 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Claim 1 contains the phrase in line 4, “setting a previous tentative state, a previous model vehicle state, and a tentative state equal to neutral;” does not make grammatical sense as these are state variables and putting a variable into “neutral” is not a state variables are in. Claim 1 contains the phrase in line 8, “setting a sample time, a brake, a previous first electric motor voltage, and a previous second electric motor voltage equal to zero;” This is indefinite because these values are not described and for example, “setting a previous first motor voltage and a previous second motor voltage” does not make sense as this does not disclose if this is setting a variable to zero or if they are setting a voltage in the motor to zero. Claim 1 contains the phrase in line 10, “setting an actuator marker equal to off” which is indefinite because setting a marker to off does not describe what is actually being set to off. Claim 1 contains the phrase in line 11, “setting ALow, BLow, ALow BFall, ALow BRise, BLow AFall, and BLow ARise equal to zero;”. None of these variables are defined. These variables are further present in pg. 3, lines 4-7, line 9, line 11, line 14, line 17, line 20, pg. 4, lines 6-7, and lines 10-1. Claim 1 contains the phrase in line 13, “measuring raw variables” what raw variable are being measured and by what? This renders this part indefinite. Claim 1 contains the phrase in pg. 3, line 1 “determining the tentative state from the raw variables” does not make grammatical sense. Claim 1 contains the phrase in pg. 3, line 5 “a Thresholdlow” is not defined. Claim 1 contains the phrase in pg. 3, line 8 “incrementing the brake by one” does not make grammatical sense nor is it implied that brake is a variable. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant's disclosure. Lee (US 2016/0001670) - system and method for battery management Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to CHARLES S LAUGHLIN whose telephone number is (571)270-7244. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Eduardo Colon-Santana can be reached at (571) 272-2060. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /C.S.L./ Examiner, Art Unit 2846 /KAWING CHAN/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2846
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 19, 2021
Application Filed
Nov 21, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §112
Jun 04, 2024
Response Filed
Feb 06, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Aug 14, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Aug 15, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 19, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12597871
A SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR PROVIDING N BIPOLAR AC PHASE VOLTAGES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12587115
DRIVING CIRCUIT FOR MOTOR SYSTEMS AND CONTROL METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12587005
CONTROLLER FOR AN ELECTRICAL POWER SUPPLY CIRCUIT OF A SUPERCONDUCTING MOTOR, SUPERCONDUCTING ELECTRICAL POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM FOR A MOTOR, AND AIRCRAFT COMPRISING SUCH A SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12562667
STARTER-GENERATOR CONTROL UNIT (SGCU) RANDOMIZED CURRENT FEEDBACK CONTROL
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12556120
ROLLABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE INCLUDING GEAR ASSEMBLY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+10.1%)
3y 2m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 372 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month