Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/279,268

SOFT TISSUE ANCHOR

Non-Final OA §102
Filed
Mar 24, 2021
Examiner
DUBOSE, LAUREN
Art Unit
3771
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Depuy Synthes Products Inc.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
60%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 1m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 60% of resolved cases
60%
Career Allow Rate
79 granted / 132 resolved
-10.2% vs TC avg
Strong +45% interview lift
Without
With
+44.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
56 currently pending
Career history
188
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
50.2%
+10.2% vs TC avg
§102
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
§112
22.8%
-17.2% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 132 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 02/27/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Regarding the previous claim objections, the amendments to claims 1, 5, 7, and 9-13 are acknowledged and the claim objections are withdrawn. Regarding the previous 112(b) rejection, the amendment to claim 5 is acknowledged and the 112(b) rejection is withdrawn. Applicant’s amendments, see pages 2-3, filed 02/27/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1 to include the allowable subject matter of claim 4 is acknowledged and the rejection of claim 1 over Martin in view of Bonutti is withdrawn. Claims 1, 5, 7-12 are allowed. Applicant’s arguments, see page 2, filed 02/27/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 13 under Martin have been fully considered and are persuasive. The examiner agrees that Martin fails to disclose “a central axis of the connector hole extending along a central longitudinal axis of the asymmetrical anchor” as required in claim 13. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made in view of Vijay et al. (US 20130267998). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 In the event the determination of the status of the application as subject to AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103 (or as subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 102 and 103) is incorrect, any correction of the statutory basis (i.e., changing from AIA to pre-AIA ) for the rejection will not be considered a new ground of rejection if the prior art relied upon, and the rationale supporting the rejection, would be the same under either status. The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(2) the claimed invention was described in a patent issued under section 151, or in an application for patent published or deemed published under section 122(b), in which the patent or application, as the case may be, names another inventor and was effectively filed before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 13 and 22 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Vijay et al. (US 20130267998) [hereinafter Vijay]. Regarding claim 13, Vijay discloses an asymmetrical anchor (Figs. 5B-C, para. 0085) having a distal end, a proximal end and a first plane extending from the distal end to the proximal end (see annotated Fig. 5B of Vijay below), the asymmetrical anchor comprising: a connector hole 73 formed on a proximal face of the distal end (see Figs. 5C-D) and provided entirely on a first side of the first plane (see annotated Fig. 5D below), a central axis of the connector hole 73 extending along a central longitudinal axis of the asymmetrical anchor (see Figs. 5A and 5D); a proximal anchor body portion (interpreted as portion comprising wings 72) extending proximally from the distal end (Figs. 5A-B, para. 0085), the proximal anchor body portion 72 having a concave surface and an opposed convex bone engaging surface (see annotated Figs. 5A and 5D below), wherein a volume of the proximal anchor body portion 72 is only enclosed on the first side of the first plane by the concave surface such that the connector hole 73 is accessible from a second side of the first plane (Fig. 5D, see annotated Fig. 5B below); and one or more teeth 80 provided on the convex bone engaging surface configured to resist proximal movement of the asymmetrical anchor when the asymmetrical anchor has been inserted in a hole with a diameter equal to or less than a maximum diameter of the asymmetrical anchor (Figs. 5B, 7-8, para. 0093, 0101). PNG media_image1.png 302 308 media_image1.png Greyscale Annotated Fig. 5B of Vijay PNG media_image2.png 320 471 media_image2.png Greyscale Annotated Fig. 5A of Vijay PNG media_image3.png 248 383 media_image3.png Greyscale Annotated Fig. 5D of Vijay Regarding claim 22, Vijay discloses wherein the central axis of the connector hole 73 extends along the central longitudinal axis of the asymmetrical anchor in a second plane that extends from the proximal end to the distal end and is orthogonal to the first plane (see annotated Fig. 5D [1] below). PNG media_image4.png 248 258 media_image4.png Greyscale Annotated Fig. 5D of Vijay Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1, 5, 7, 9-12 are allowed. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to LAUREN DUBOSE whose telephone number is (571)272-8792. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 7:30am-5:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Elizabeth Houston can be reached on 571-272-7134. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /LAUREN DUBOSE/Examiner, Art Unit 3771 /SARAH A LONG/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3771
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Mar 24, 2021
Application Filed
Jun 14, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Sep 20, 2024
Response Filed
Dec 18, 2024
Final Rejection — §102
Jan 28, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 28, 2025
Examiner Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 30, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 27, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 28, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 16, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jul 16, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jul 16, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jul 23, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 26, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Feb 19, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 19, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 27, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 12, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 18, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12564408
MEDICAL OCCLUDER DELIVERY SYSTEMS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 03, 2026
Patent 12496090
MEDICAL DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 16, 2025
Patent 12433640
BIOSTIMULATOR RETRIEVAL SYSTEM HAVING CINCHER TUBE
2y 5m to grant Granted Oct 07, 2025
Patent 12426921
INTERVENTIONAL MEDICAL SYSTEMS AND ASSOCIATED ASSEMBLIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 30, 2025
Patent 12426887
LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE OCCLUSION DEVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Sep 30, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
60%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+44.9%)
3y 1m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 132 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month