Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/294,049

ACRYLATE COPOLYMERS FOR GALENIC APPLICATIONS

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
May 14, 2021
Examiner
STANLEY, JANE L
Art Unit
1767
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 3m
To Grant
89%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allow Rate
545 granted / 933 resolved
-6.6% vs TC avg
Strong +30% interview lift
Without
With
+30.2%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 3m
Avg Prosecution
59 currently pending
Career history
992
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
1.2%
-38.8% vs TC avg
§103
37.9%
-2.1% vs TC avg
§102
24.1%
-15.9% vs TC avg
§112
24.3%
-15.7% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 933 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Applicant’s reply and request for continued examination (RCE), filed 2 December 2025 in response to the Final Office action mailed 2 June 2025, has been entered and fully considered. As per Applicant’s filed claim amendments claims 1-5, 7 and 13-16 are pending under examination, wherein: claims 1 and 14-15 have been amended, claims 2-7 and 13 are as previously presented, claim 6 has been cancelled, claim 16 is new, and claims 8-12 are withdrawn by previous restriction requirement. Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 2 December 2025 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112(b) The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-2, 4-5, 7 and 13-16 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Regarding claim 1, the as-amended claim recitation of “R is a residue of an ɑ-hydroxycarboxylic acid” renders the claim indefinite as: a broad range or limitation together with a narrow range or limitation that falls within the broad range or limitation (in the same claim) may be considered indefinite if the resulting claim does not clearly set forth the metes and bounds of the patent protection desired. See MPEP § 2173.05(c). In the present instance, the claim recites the broad recitation of ‘R is a residue of an ɑ-hydroxycarboxylic acid’, and the claim also recites a plurality of specific R groups which are the narrower statements of the range/limitation. The claim(s) are considered indefinite because there is a question or doubt as to whether the feature introduced by such narrower language is (a) merely exemplary of the remainder of the claim, and therefore not required, or (b) a required feature of the claims. Amending the claim to recite ‘wherein R is a residue of an ɑ-hydroxycarboxylic acid selected from R=…’ should overcome this rejection. This includes claims 2, 4-5, 7 and 16 as they depend from claim 1. Regarding claim 14, the as-amended claim recitation of “R is a residue of an ɑ-hydroxycarboxylic acid” renders the claim indefinite as: a broad range or limitation together with a narrow range or limitation that falls within the broad range or limitation (in the same claim) may be considered indefinite if the resulting claim does not clearly set forth the metes and bounds of the patent protection desired. See MPEP § 2173.05(c). In the present instance, the claim recites the broad recitation of ‘R is a residue of an ɑ-hydroxycarboxylic acid’, and the claim also recites a plurality of specific R groups which are the narrower statements of the range/limitation. The claim(s) are considered indefinite because there is a question or doubt as to whether the feature introduced by such narrower language is (a) merely exemplary of the remainder of the claim, and therefore not required, or (b) a required feature of the claims. Amending the claim to recite ‘wherein R is a residue of an ɑ-hydroxycarboxylic acid selected from R=…’ should overcome this rejection. This includes claim 15 as it depend from claim 1. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 3 is allowed over the prior arts of record. Response to Arguments/Amendments The objections to claims 1 and 14-15 are withdrawn as a result of Applicant’s filed claim amendments. The 35 U.S.C. 112(b) rejections of claims 1-2, 4-7 and 13-15 as set forth previously is withdrawn as a result of Applicant’s filed claim amendments. Note the new grounds of rejection as set forth above as necessitated by said claim amendments. The 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) rejection of claims 1-2, 4-7 and 13-15 as anticipated by Borve (WO 03/080747 A1) and the 35 U.S.C. 103 rejection of claims 14-15 as unpatentable over Passade Boupat (US PGPub 2006/0030685) are withdrawn as a result of Applicant’s filed claim amendments. Correspondence Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JANE L STANLEY whose telephone number is (571)270-3870. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 7:30 AM to 3:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Mark Eashoo can be reached at 571-272-1197. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JANE L STANLEY/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1767
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 14, 2021
Application Filed
Nov 27, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §112
May 15, 2025
Response Filed
May 30, 2025
Final Rejection — §112
Dec 02, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 03, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12584051
Urethane-Based Adhesive Composition
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12559658
WORKING MEDIUM AND HEAT CYCLE SYSTEM
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12545768
METHOD OF MAKING A BIODEGRADABLE THERMAL INSULATION COMPOSITE BASED ON POLY (BETA-HYDROXYBUTYRATE)
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12540229
FLAME-RETARDANT COMPOSITION AND FLAME-RETARDANT SYNTHETIC RESIN COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12540082
COBALT FERRITE PARTICLE PRODUCTION METHOD AND COBALT FERRITE PARTICLES PRODUCED THEREBY
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
89%
With Interview (+30.2%)
3y 3m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 933 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month