Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/296,238

ADHESIVE COMPOSITION

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Aug 04, 2022
Examiner
LI, AIQUN
Art Unit
1766
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Arkema France
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
64%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 64% of resolved cases
64%
Career Allow Rate
523 granted / 822 resolved
-1.4% vs TC avg
Strong +22% interview lift
Without
With
+22.5%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
43 currently pending
Career history
865
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
45.3%
+5.3% vs TC avg
§102
27.9%
-12.1% vs TC avg
§112
16.5%
-23.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 822 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 16 February 2026 has been entered. The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim Objection Claims 1-5 and 11 stand objected to because of the following informalities: Claim 1 recites “ in an amount of from 0.3 to 2%”, which appears to be “ in an amount of from 0.3 to 2% by weight” in light of the specification (Table IV). Appropriate correction is required. Response to Amendment and Arguments Applicant’s amendment overcomes the rejection of claims 1-5 and 11 under 35 U.S.C. 103 over US2017/0226391A1 (Vietti). The rejection has been withdrawn. Applicant’s arguments in light of the amendment have been fully considered but are moot as they do not apply to the current rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 Claims 1-5 and 11 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over US2020/0106061A1 (Mizuta), which is listed in Applicant’s information disclosure statement, in view of Vietti. Regarding claims 1 and 4-5, Mizuta teaches an adhesive composition comprising a polyisocyanate and a polyester polyol of a molecular weight of from 3000 to about 100,000 g/mol ([0015]), exemplified as 10,000 above ([0166]-[0170], [0173]-[0175], and [0177]-[0178]), which meets the claimed molecular weight . Mizuta further teaches that the composition may further comprises epoxy resins in an amount of 0.1 or more parts by mass and 10 or less parts by mass relative to 100 parts of the polyol ([0113] and [0118]), which meets the claimed additive and amount. Mizuta does not expressly teaches the presence of a phosphate ester polyol compound, the claimed structure or amount. Vietti teaches a phosphate ester can be added to an adhesion composition to provide improved properties such as significantly better green bonds, simplified lamination process and resistance to defects and delamination ([0002], [0115] and [0133]), wherein the phosphate polyol can be prepared by reacting a polyphosphoric acid with a polyether polyol ([110]), and the phosphate polyol having a structure of ([0023]) : PNG media_image1.png 114 162 media_image1.png Greyscale which meets the claimed structure (II). Vietti further discloses that the polyol is in excess relative to the phosphoric acid after the reaction with a phosphoric acid ([0045]), thus one of ordinary skill would expect the formation of phosphate diester polyol of structure (I). Vietti exemplifies a formulation comprises 100 pbw of a polyol containing 75-80% of hydroxy functional polyester and 0.25 pbw of glycerin phosphate ([0117] and [0122], Table 10A), thus the glycerin phosphate is present in an amount of about 0.31-0.33 wt.% of the combined polyol component, calculated by the examiner , i.e., 0.25/(0.25+100X80) to (0.25/(0.25+100X75) , which meets the claimed amount. At the time the invention was made it would have been obvious for a person of ordinary skill in the art to add the phosphate ester polyol of Vietti and its amount in the adhesive composition of Mizuta. The rationale to do so would have been the motivation provided by the teachings of Vietti that to do so would predictably provide better green bonds, simplified lamination process and resistance to defects and delamination ([0115] and [0133]). Regarding claim 2 , Mizuta exemplifies a formulation comprises 10 parts of a polyester polyol and 2 parts of a polyisocyanate ([0194]), thus the ratio of the polyol component to that of the polyisocyanate is about 10:2=5, which meets the claimed range. Regarding claims 3 and 11, Mizuta and Vietti teach all of the claimed ingredients in the claimed amounts, one of ordinary skill would have reasonable basis to expect the bond strength, aging time or moldability would naturally arise and be achieved by the composition of Mizuta Vietti. "Products of identical chemical composition can not have mutually exclusive properties." In re Spada, 911 F.2d 705, 709, 15 USPQ2d 1655, 1658 (Fed. Cir. 1990). A chemical composition and its properties are inseparable. Therefore, if the prior art teaches the identical chemical structure, the properties applicant discloses and/or claims are necessarily present. See MPEP § 2112.01. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to AIQUN LI whose telephone number is (571)270-7736. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday 9:00 am -4:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Randy Gulakowski can be reached at 571-2721302. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /AIQUN LI/Ph.D., Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1766
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 04, 2022
Application Filed
Oct 07, 2021
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 23, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 22, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 13, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Feb 16, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 21, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600894
LIGNIN-BASED DRILLING FLUIDS AND RELATED METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597596
NANO-SILICON-GRAPHITE COMPOSITE NEGATIVE ELECTRODE MATERIAL WITH CARBON COATING AND ALUMINUM METAPHOSPHATE COMPOSITE MODIFICATION LAYER ON SURFACE AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12592654
MOISTURE ENABLED ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION MATERIALS AND DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12577451
POLYANIONIC SURFACTANTS AND METHODS OF MAKING AND USING THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12576430
Method of Pretreating a Pipeline or Apparatus
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
64%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+22.5%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 822 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month