Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/302,722

Multicast Broadcast Service for 5G New Radio

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 11, 2021
Examiner
SEN, ANINDITA
Art Unit
2478
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Apple Inc.
OA Round
5 (Non-Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
87%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
62 granted / 75 resolved
+24.7% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+3.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
51 currently pending
Career history
126
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.3%
-39.7% vs TC avg
§103
78.5%
+38.5% vs TC avg
§102
14.7%
-25.3% vs TC avg
§112
1.9%
-38.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 75 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DEATILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the amendment filed 2/04/2026 have been considered and a new rejection issued. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 23,24,25,27,28,29,30,32,33 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kyo et al. (KR20210037511A) in view of Kadiri et al. (US20210068003A1) In further view of Dao et al. US20210105196A1 Regarding Claim 23, Kyo teaches, A method, comprising: at a session management function (SMF) of a cellular network: Fig 3 determining that a user equipment (UE) is configured to receive data from a first radio access network (RAN) node via a first session;[16]- receiving a message(=config) requesting confirmation of whether to use a specific application, a specific service, or a specific session from a base station; determining a counter operated at the SMF does [34] The MBS function described above includes, for example, a Broadcast Multicast-control plane function (BM-CPF) or a SMF (Session Management function).[100]- the SMF transmits the threshold value to the base station in step 5/6. Through the Like, the base station can receive an appropriate threshold value. the base station may classify the MBS session traffic based on the received value through the dedicated 5QI value as described above, and determine whether to switch the transmission method of the corresponding MBS traffic from unicast to broadcast/multicast. transmitting a session modification request to a user plane function (UPF) for the switch from the first session to the multicast session based on the counter [68] In step 6a, the SMF notifies the UPF that the existing unicast transmission method is to be changed to a broadcast/multicast transmission method(=transmitting a session modification request to a user plane function (UPF) ) Accordingly, the UPF may stop transmission of traffic going to the unicast tunnel. [48]- Based on the acquired information, the base station may switch the transmission method from unicast to multicast/broadcast when the number of terminals exceeds a specific threshold. triggering a switch from the first session to a multicast session based on the counter [63]- data rate used by the corresponding terminals exceeds a certain threshold, The base station may decide to switch from a unicast transmission scheme to a broadcast/multicast transmission scheme. FIG. 5 is a diagram for explaining a method of determining whether a base station switches from a unicast method to a multicast/broadcast method with the help of a 5G CN(=second RAN) according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. Kyo does not teach not exceeding the predetermined threshold Kadiri teaches, not exceeding the predetermined threshold [298]- transitioning to a CONNECTED mode state for future reception of the multicast/broadcast traffic via the multicast radio bearer based at least in part on the reception quality being below the threshold. It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Kyo, not exceeding the predetermined threshold as taught by Kadiri to different RANs between multicast or unicast to adapt data capacity for RAN capacity. Dao does not teach MBS context, however Kyo in [73] teaches this. Kyo teaches receiving an MBS context in [73]. However, Kyo in view of Kadiri does not teach, and receiving an MBS context comprising a common tunnel endpoint identifier (C- TEID) Dao teaches, and receiving an ) [206]- Alternatively, the AMF 803 may use a service such as Nsmf_PDUSession_UpdateSMContext Request to notify the G-SMF of the new location of UE. The AMF 803 may include the AN tunnel information, which may include the AN address and TEID in the downlink. a method is provided for the G-SMF to select a MB Session Anchor (MBSA) UPF to serve the MB Session. It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Kyo in view of Kadiri, and receiving an ) as taught by Dao to include a C-TEID into the MBS Context of Kyo-Kadiri to adapt data capacity for RAN. Regarding Claim 24, Kyo does not teach, the method of claim 23, wherein the first RAN node does not support MBS Kadiri teaches, the method of claim 23, wherein the first RAN node does not support MBS. [141]-In some cases when the RAN node 410-a is communicating with the UEs 115-f and 115-g using a broadcast/unicast only mode. It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Kyo in view of Kadiri, the method of claim 23, wherein the first RAN node does not support MBS as taught by Kadiri to different RANs between multicast or unicast to adapt data capacity for RAN capacity. Dao does not teach MBS context, however Kyo in [73] teaches this. Regarding Claim 25, Kyo teaches, the method of claim 23, wherein the session modification request is transmitted over a N4 interface. [94] For example, in step 4, SMF broadcasts/multicasts the traffic corresponding to TMGI, MBS application ID, MBS service ID, MBS session ID, and MBS service flow ID to UPF through N4 Session establishment or N4 Session modification messages. Regarding Claim 27, Kyo teaches, the method of claim 23, wherein the MBS context further comprises quality of service (QoS) information.[13] base station in a wireless communication system according to an embodiment, based on a 5QI value for a quality of service (QoS) flow of traffic acquired to the base station, Regarding Claim 28, Kyo teaches, One or more processors of a session management function (SMF) configured to perform operations, the operations comprising determining that a user equipment (UE) is configured to receive data from a first radio access network (RAN) node via a first session;[16]- receiving a message(=config) requesting confirmation of whether to use a specific application, a specific service, or a specific session from a base station; determining a counter operated at the SMF does not exceed a predetermined threshold for multicast broadcast service (MBS) users within a tracking area; [34] The MBS function described above includes, for example, a Broadcast Multicast-control plane function (BM-CPF) or a SMF (Session Management function).[100]- the SMF transmits the threshold value to the base station in step 5/6. Through the Like, the base station can receive an appropriate threshold value. the base station may classify the MBS session traffic based on the received value through the dedicated 5QI value as described above, and determine whether to switch the transmission method of the corresponding MBS traffic from unicast to broadcast/multicast. transmitting a session modification request to a user plane function (UPF) for the switch from the first session to the multicast session based on the counter [68] In step 6a, the SMF notifies the UPF that the existing unicast transmission method is to be changed to a broadcast/multicast transmission method(=transmitting a session modification request to a user plane function (UPF) ) Accordingly, the UPF may stop transmission of traffic going to the unicast tunnel. [48]- Based on the acquired information, the base station may switch the transmission method from unicast to multicast/broadcast when the number of terminals exceeds a specific threshold. triggering a switch from the first session to a multicast session based on the counter not exceeding the predetermined threshold, wherein the UE is to receive data from a second RAN node via the multicast session and [63]- data rate used by the corresponding terminals exceeds a certain threshold, The base station may decide to switch from a unicast transmission scheme to a broadcast/multicast transmission scheme. FIG. 5 is a diagram for explaining a method of determining whether a base station switches from a unicast method to a multicast/broadcast method with the help of a 5G CN(=second RAN) according to an embodiment of the present disclosure. Kyo does not teach not exceeding the predetermined threshold Kadiri teaches, not exceeding the predetermined threshold [298]- transitioning to a CONNECTED mode state for future reception of the multicast/broadcast traffic via the multicast radio bearer based at least in part on the reception quality being below the threshold. It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Kyo, not exceeding the predetermined threshold as taught by Kadiri to different RANs between multicast or unicast to adapt data capacity for RAN capacity. Dao does not teach MBS context, however Kyo in [73] teaches this. Kyo teaches receiving an MBS context in [73]. However, Kyo in view of Kadiri does not teach, and receiving an MBS context comprising a common tunnel endpoint identifier (C- TEID) Dao teaches, and receiving an ) [206]- Alternatively, the AMF 803 may use a service such as Nsmf_PDUSession_UpdateSMContext Request to notify the G-SMF of the new location of UE. The AMF 803 may include the AN tunnel information, which may include the AN address and TEID in the downlink. a method is provided for the G-SMF to select a MB Session Anchor (MBSA) UPF to serve the MB Session. It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Kyo in view of Kadiri, and receiving an ) as taught by Dao to include a C-TEID into the MBS Context of Kyo-Kadiri to adapt data capacity for RAN. Regarding Claim 29, Kyo does not teach, The one or more processors of claim 28, wherein the first RAN node does not support MBS. Kadiri teaches,the one or more processors of claim 28, wherein the first RAN node does not support MBS. [141]-In some cases when the RAN node 410-a is communicating with the UEs 115-f and 115-g using a broadcast/unicast only mode. It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Kyo, the one or more processors of claim 28, wherein the first RAN node does not support MBS as taught by Kadiri to different RANs between multicast or unicast to adapt data capacity for RAN capacity. Regarding Claim 30,Kyo teaches, the one or more processors of claim 28, wherein the session modification request is transmitted over a N4 interface. [94] For example, in step 4, SMF broadcasts/multicasts the traffic corresponding to TMGI, MBS application ID, MBS service ID, MBS session ID, and MBS service flow ID to UPF through N4 Session establishment or N4 Session modification messages. Regarding Claim 32, Kyo teaches, the one or more processors of claim 2, wherein the MBS context further comprises quality of service (QoS) information [13] base station in a wireless communication system according to an embodiment, based on a 5QI value for a quality of service (QoS) flow of traffic acquired to the base station, Regarding Claim 33, Kyo in view of Kadiri does not teach, The one or more processors of claim 28, wherein the session modification request includes a temporary mobile group identifier (TMGI). Dao teaches, The one or more processors of claim 28, wherein the session modification request includes a temporary mobile group identifier (TMGI). [73] At step 570, the AF 322 may send a request to NEF 314 to indicate switching from unicast deKadirivery to MB deKadirivery in the downlink. The message may include one or more of following information: UE Group information, e.g. Internal Group ID, External Group ID, and/or TMGI. It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Kyo in view of Kadiri, The one or more processors of claim 28, wherein the session modification request includes a temporary mobile group identifier (TMGI) as taught by Dao to different RANs between multicast or unicast to adapt data capacity for RAN capacity. Claim(s) 34,36,37,38,40,41 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kyo et al. (KR20210037511A) in view of Kadiri et al. (US20210068003A1) In further view of Dao et al. US20210105196A1) in further view of Xie et al. (US20220377507A1) Regarding Claim 34, Kyo in view of Kadiri and Dao does not teach, The one or more processors of claim 28, wherein the MBS context further comprises a flow identifier corresponding to an MBS bearer service. Xie teaches, The one or more processors of claim 28, wherein the MBS context further comprises a flow identifier corresponding to an MBS bearer service. [120]- command the MB-UPF to update a multicast session, including informing the MB-UPF of address information of the corresponding base stations and channel identifiers. It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Kyo in view of Kadiri and Dao, The one or more processors of claim 28, wherein the MBS context further comprises a flow identifier corresponding to an MBS bearer service as taught by Xie to different RANs between multicast or unicast to adapt data capacity for RAN capacity. Regarding Claim 36, Kyo in view of Kadiri and Dao does not teach, The one or more processors of claim 28, wherein the MBS context comprises a List of down stream nodes that have requested MBS bearer service. Xie teaches, The one or more processors of claim 28, wherein the MBS context comprises a List of downstream nodes that have requested MBS bearer service. [136]- The MBSF determines to switch the multicast mode to a unicast mode, based on a user count of multicast service or a user count of multicast service in one or more areas (for example one or more tracking areas or one or more base station nodes). It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Kyo in view of Kadiri and Dao, The one or more processors of claim 28, wherein the MBS context comprises a List of down stream nodes that have requested MBS bearer service as taught by Xie to different RANs between multicast or unicast to adapt data capacity for RAN capacity. Regarding Claim 37, Kyo in view of Kadiri and Dao does not teach, The one or more processors or claim 28, wherein the MBS context further comprises multicast addresses Xie teaches, The one or more processors or claim 28, wherein the MBS context further comprises multicast addresses. [70-74] [73]- (3) a multicast address, for example, an IP multicast address. It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Kyo in view of Kadiri and Dao, The one or more processors or claim 28, wherein the MBS context further comprises multicast addresses as taught by Xie to different RANs between multicast or unicast to adapt data capacity for RAN capacity. Regarding Claim 38, Kyo in view of Kadiri and Dao does not teach, , The method of claim 23, wherein the MBS context further comprises a flow identifier corresponding to an MBS bearer service Xie teaches, The method of claim 23, wherein the MBS context further comprises a flow identifier corresponding to an MBS bearer service. [96]- In this embodiment of the present invention, a user terminal can switch between a multicast bearer and a unicast bearer based on a mode switch operation for a multicast service. It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Kyo in view of Kadiri and Dao, , The method of claim 23, wherein the MBS context further comprises a flow identifier corresponding to an MBS bearer service as taught by Xie to different RANs between multicast or unicast to adapt data capacity for RAN capacity. Regarding Claim 40, Kyo in view of Kadiri and Dao does not teach, The method of claim 23, wherein the MBS context further comprises a List of down stream nodes that have requested MBS bearer service. Xie teaches, The method of claim 23, wherein the MBS context further comprises a List of down stream nodes that have requested MBS bearer service. [136]- The MBSF determines to switch the multicast mode to a unicast mode, based on a user count of multicast service or a user count of multicast service in one or more areas (for example one or more tracking areas or one or more base station nodes). It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Kyo in view of Kadiri and Dao, The method of claim 23, wherein the MBS context further comprises a List of down stream nodes that have requested MBS bearer service as taught by Xie to different RANs between multicast or unicast to adapt data capacity for RAN capacity. Regarding Claim 41, Kyo in view of Kadiri and Dao does not teach, The method of claim 23, wherein the MBS context further comprises multicast addresses. Xie teaches, The method of claim 23, wherein the MBS context further comprises multicast addresses. [70-74] [73]- (3) a multicast address, for example, an IP multicast address. It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Kyo in view of Kadiri and Dao, The method of claim 23, wherein the MBS context further comprises multicast addresses as taught by Xie to different RANs between multicast or unicast to adapt data capacity for RAN capacity. Claim(s) 35,39 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kadiri et al. (CN104918204A) in view of Kyo et al. (US201916511568A) Dao et al. US20210105196A1 in further view of Baek et al. (US20220279319A1) Regarding Claim 35, Kyo in view of Kadiri and Dao does not teach, The one or more processors of claim 28, wherein the MBS context further comprises a List of cell IDs. Baek teaches, The one or more processors of claim 28, wherein the MBS context further comprises a List of cell IDs.[66]- MBS service coverage that can be supported by the AMF, for example, a MBS service area, or a part or all of a TAI List or a cell ID List. It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Kyo in view of Kadiri and Dao, The one or more processors of claim 28, wherein the MBS context further comprises a List of cell IDs as taught by Xie to different RANs between multicast or unicast to adapt data capacity for RAN capacity. Regarding Claim 39, Kyo in view of Kadiri and Dao does not teach, The method of claim 23, wherein the MBS context further comprises a List of cell IDs. Baek teaches The method of claim 23, wherein the MBS context further comprises a List of cell IDs.[66]- MBS service coverage that can be supported by the AMF, for example, a MBS service area, or a part or all of a TAI List or a cell ID List. It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Kyo in view of Kadiri and Dao, The method of claim 23, wherein the MBS context further comprises a List of cell IDs as taught by Xie to different RANs between multicast or unicast to adapt data capacity for RAN capacity. Claim 42 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kyo et al. (KR20210037511A) in view of Kadiri et al. (US20210068003A1) In further view of Dao et al. (US20210105196A1) in further view of Xu et al. (US20230108178A1) Regarding Claim 42, Kyo in view of Kadiri and Dao does not teach, The method of claim 23, wherein the MBS context further comprises a TEID of an MBS gateway for a control plane. Xu teaches The method of claim 23, wherein the MBS context further comprises a TEID of an MBS gateway for a control plane.[216]- The one or more MBS areas may comprise the first MBS area and the second MBS area. The MBs related information may comprise at least one of a service identity, MBS tunnel endpoint identifier (TEID), multicast address or MBS flow identity. It would have been obvious to a person having an ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the system of Kyo in view of Kadiri and Dao, The method of claim 23, wherein the MBS context further comprises a TEID of an MBS gateway for a control plane as taught by Xu to different RANs between multicast or unicast to adapt data capacity for RAN capacity. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Anindita Sen whose telephone number is (571)-272-2390. The examiner can normally be reached 7:30am-5:30pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Joseph Avellino can be reached on (571)-272-3905. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would Like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /ANINDITA SEN/Examiner, Art Unit 2478 /JOSEPH E AVELLINO/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 2478
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 11, 2021
Application Filed
Nov 03, 2022
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 09, 2023
Response Filed
May 25, 2023
Final Rejection — §103
Sep 01, 2023
Notice of Allowance
Nov 01, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 09, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 29, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 02, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 03, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 04, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 04, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 11, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 02, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Apr 28, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Apr 28, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
May 07, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
May 13, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
May 16, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 15, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 30, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Feb 04, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 14, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 03, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12547166
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TELEOPERATIONS AND SUPPORT SERVICES
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12543075
METHOD AND MULTI SIM UE FOR MANAGING DATA SESSION IN WIRELESS NETWORK
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12526771
OFDMA TRIGGER BASED PEER TO PEER OPERATIONS WITH DUAL-STAGE TRIGGERING
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12526789
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12490205
METHODS AND DEVICES OF INFORMATION TRANSMISSION AND INFORMATION RECEPTION, AND TERMINAL
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 02, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
87%
With Interview (+3.9%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 75 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month