Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/307,761

Information Transmission Method and Apparatus

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 04, 2021
Examiner
HAILU, KIBROM T
Art Unit
2461
Tech Center
2400 — Computer Networks
Assignee
Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
OA Round
7 (Non-Final)
80%
Grant Probability
Favorable
7-8
OA Rounds
2y 11m
To Grant
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 80% — above average
80%
Career Allow Rate
677 granted / 847 resolved
+21.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +6% lift
Without
With
+6.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 11m
Avg Prosecution
40 currently pending
Career history
887
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
4.7%
-35.3% vs TC avg
§103
49.9%
+9.9% vs TC avg
§102
23.0%
-17.0% vs TC avg
§112
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 847 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on January 13, 2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claims 1, 3-8, 10-15, 17-20, and 22-25 have been considered but are moot due to the new ground of rejection. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. The factual inquiries for establishing a background for determining obviousness under 35 U.S.C. 103 are summarized as follows: 1. Determining the scope and contents of the prior art. 2. Ascertaining the differences between the prior art and the claims at issue. 3. Resolving the level of ordinary skill in the pertinent art. 4. Considering objective evidence present in the application indicating obviousness or nonobviousness. Claims 1, 3, 5-8, 10, 12-15, 17, 19-20, and 22-25 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Matsumura et al. (US 2021/0306996 A1) in view of Takeda et al. (US 2021/0258936 A1). Regarding claim 1, Matsumura discloses an information transmission method (abstract), comprising: obtaining, by a terminal, first spatial parameter information of a first channel (paragraph [0049]-[0070]; [0098]-[0099]; and so on, illustrating that the UE is receiving first spatial parameter information such as QCL or TCI for PDCCH); and receiving, by the terminal, the first channel based on the first spatial parameter information (paragraph [0049]-[0070]; [0098]-[0099]; [0082]-[0087]; [0106]; and etc., the channel or PDCCH is received based on the partial parameter information), wherein the first channel is one of a plurality of candidate control channels in a first control resource set (paragraph [0028]; [0046]-[0047]; [0102]; and so on, the channel is one of the candidate control channel), wherein the first control resource set is associated with a UE search space set (USS) (paragraph [0046]-[0047]), and wherein the first control resource set is configured by using a master information block MIB, a system information block type 1 SIB 1, or a physical downlink control channel (PDCCH) common configuration parameter (paragraph [0028]-[0032]; [0035]-[0045]; [0206]; [0313]; and so on, explaining first CORESET is configured by using such as MIB, SIB or PDCCH), wherein the first channel carriers downlink control information (DCI),wherein a format of the DCI is a first DCI format (paragraph [0067]; [0145]), and wherein whether the DCI comprises a first field used to indicate spatial parameter information (paragraph [0061]-[0062]; [0070]; [0091]-[0100]; [0142]-[0146]; and so on). Matsumura doesn’t disclose in response to receiving the first channel, determining, by the terminal, that the terminal meets a first condition; and in response to determining that the terminal meets the first condition, determining, by the terminal, that the first DCI format comprised the first field is used to indicate the spatial parameter information, wherein the condition is that a second control resource set of a current active bandwidth part (BWP) of the terminal enables the first field, and wherein the second control resource set comprises at least one control resource set other than the first control resource set in control resource sets of the current active BWP of the terminal. Takeda teaches in response to receiving the first channel, determining, by the terminal, that the terminal meets a first condition (paragraph [0105]-[0110]; [0123]-[0130]; [0133]-[0134]; and so on); and in response to determining that the terminal meets the first condition, determining, by the terminal, that the first DCI format comprised the first field is used to indicate the spatial parameter information (paragraph [0097]-[0101]; [0105]-[0107]; [0110]; [0114]-[0115]; [0119]-[0120]; [0123]-[0130] and etc.), wherein the condition is that a second control resource set of a current active bandwidth part (BWP) of the terminal enables the first field, and wherein the second control resource set comprises at least one control resource set other than the first control resource set in control resource sets of the current active BWP of the terminal (paragraph [005]-[0063]; [0068]; [0097]-[0101]; [0105]-[0112]; [0114]-[0115]; [0119]-[0134]; [0138]; [0141]-[0143]; and so on). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date to use in response to receiving the first channel, determining, by the terminal, that the terminal meets a first condition; and in response to determining that the terminal meets the first condition, determining, by the terminal, that the first DCI format comprised the first field is used to indicate the spatial parameter information, wherein the condition is that a second control resource set of a current active bandwidth part (BWP) of the terminal enables the first field, and wherein the second control resource set comprises at least one control resource set other than the first control resource set in control resource sets of the current active BWP of the terminal as taught by Takeda into Matsumura in order to improve speed or rate of communication, and resource utilization. Regarding claim 8 and 15, the claims include features identical to subject matter mentioned in the rejection to claim 1 above. The claims are mere reformulation of claim 1 in order to define the corresponding an information transmission at the transmitting side and a communication apparatus, and the rejection to claim 1 is applied hereto. Claim 8 is an information transmission at the transmitting side. However, the subject matter is the same as in claim 1. Regarding claim 5, 12, and 19, Matsumura discloses wherein the first channel schedules a second channel, the second channel is used to carry broadcast information (paragraph [0067]; [0082]; [0140]-[0144]; [0147]; [0206]; and so on), and spatial parameter information of the second channel is second spatial parameter information (paragraph [0065]-[0067]; [0069]-[0070]; [0082]-[0086]; [0127]; [0138]-[0153]; [0155]-[0156]; [0159]-[0163]; [0185]-[0188]; [0206]-[0209]; and etc.), and wherein the broadcast information comprises at least one of the following information: system information, remaining minimum system information, other system information, a paging message, or a random access message (paragraph [0206]; [0313]; and so on). Regarding claim 6, 13, and 20, Matsumura discloses wherein the second spatial parameter information is the same as spatial parameter information of a fourth control resource set, and wherein the fourth control resource set is a control resource set 0 (paragraph [0078]-[0081]; [0101]). Regarding claim 7, 14, and 23-24, Matsumura discloses wherein the second spatial parameter information is the same as the first spatial parameter information, or the second spatial parameter information is the same as spatial parameter information of the first control resource set (paragraph [0052]; [0241]-[0243]; [0080]-[0081]; [0099]; and so on). Regarding claim 22 and 25, Matsumura further discloses comprising: determining, by the terminal, whether the DCI comprises the first field (e.g. paragraph [0084]; [0062]; [0070]; and etc.); and in response to determining that the DCI comprises the first field, determining, by the terminal, based on the first field, a narrow beam to receive data (fig. 1; paragraph [0085]-[0086]; [0065]-[0070]; [0197]; [0205]; [0119]-[0122]; [0124]-[0133]; [0139]-[0189]; and so on). Regarding claim 3, 10, and 17, the modified communication of Matsumura discloses control resource sets and active BWP of the terminal. The modified communication of Matsumura doesn’t disclose wherein: the second control resource set is all control resource sets of the current active BWP of the terminal other than the first control resource set; the second control resource set is a control resource set with a smallest identifier in all control resource sets of the current active BWP of the terminal other than the first control resource set; or the second control resource set is a control resource set that is associated with a USS and that is of the current active BWP of the terminal other than the first control resource set. Takeda teaches wherein: the second control resource set is all control resource sets of the current active BWP of the terminal other than the first control resource set; the second control resource set is a control resource set with a smallest identifier in all control resource sets of the current active BWP of the terminal other than the first control resource set; or the second control resource set is a control resource set that is associated with the USS and that is of the current active BWP of the terminal other than the first control resource set (paragraph [0054]-[0055]; [0140]; [0248]; [0097]-[0100]; [0104]-[0107]; [0110]-[0112]; [0118]-[0119]; [0123]; [0127]-[0133]; [0138]; [0141]; [0143]; [0061]-[0062]; [0065]; [0068]; and so on). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use wherein: the second control resource set is all control resource sets of the current active BWP of the terminal other than the first control resource set; the second control resource set is a control resource set with a smallest identifier in all control resource sets of the current active BWP of the terminal other than the first control resource set; or the second control resource set is a control resource set that is associated with the USS and that is of the current active BWP of the terminal other than the first control resource set as taught by Takeda into the modified communication of Matsumurm in order to reduce delay, and to improve resource utilization and efficiency of communication. Claims 4, 11, and 18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Matsumura in view of Harada and Takeda, and further in view of Tiirola et al. (US 2019/0150073 A1). Regarding claim 4, 11, and 18, as applied above, Matsumura ‘996 discloses control resource set. However, Matsumura ‘996 doesn’t disclose wherein the control resource set that is associated with the USS and that is of the current active BWP of the terminal other than the first control resource set is: a control resource set with a smallest identifier in all control resource sets that are associated with the USS and that are of the current active BWP of the terminal other than the first control resource set; or a control resource set associated with the USS with a smallest identifier in all control resource sets of the current active BWP of the terminal other than the first control resource set. Tiirola teaches wherein the control resource set that is associated with the USS and that is of the current active BWP of the terminal other than the first control resource set is: a control resource set with a smallest identifier in all control resource sets that are associated with the USS and that are of the current active BWP of the terminal other than the first control resource set; or a control resource set associated with the USS with a smallest identifier in all control resource sets of the current active BWP of the terminal other than the first control resource set (paragraph [0048]-[0050]; [0040]; [0080]). Therefore, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the invention to use wherein the control resource set that is associated with the USS and that is of the current active BWP of the terminal other than the first control resource set is: a control resource set with a smallest identifier in all control resource sets that are associated with the USS and that are of the current active BWP of the terminal other than the first control resource set; or a control resource set associated with the USS with a smallest identifier in all control resource sets of the current active BWP of the terminal other than the first control resource set as taught by Tiirola into Matsumura ‘996 in order to improve resource utilization. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KIBROM T HAILU whose telephone number is (571)270-1209. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:00 AM to 5:30 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, HUY D VU can be reached at (571)272-3155. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /KIBROM T HAILU/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2461
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

May 04, 2021
Application Filed
Jun 01, 2021
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 26, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Nov 22, 2023
Response Filed
Feb 14, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
May 20, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 21, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Jun 27, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 04, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Oct 08, 2024
Response Filed
Dec 30, 2024
Final Rejection — §103
Apr 02, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
May 05, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
May 09, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
May 12, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Aug 05, 2025
Response Filed
Nov 10, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Jan 13, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 04, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 15, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12604272
HANDLING OF MEASUREMENT RELAXATION AND OTHER ACTIVITY SKIPPING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12604216
ALLOCATING RESOURCE ENTITIES FOR TRACE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12592987
PATH VISIBILITY, PACKET DROP, AND LATENCY MEASUREMENT WITH SERVICE CHAINING DATA FLOWS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12581552
METHOD AND DEVICE FOR RELAY COMMUNICATION IN SIDELINK
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12574898
COMMUNICATION METHOD AND TERMINAL APPARATUS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 10, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
80%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+6.3%)
2y 11m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 847 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month