Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026
Application No. 17/327,389

Methodology of Instantaneous Hot Water Production in Suboptimal Operations

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
May 21, 2021
Examiner
BARGERO, JOHN E
Art Unit
3762
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
The Marley Company LLC
OA Round
7 (Non-Final)
55%
Grant Probability
Moderate
7-8
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
86%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 55% of resolved cases
55%
Career Allowance Rate
328 granted / 593 resolved
-14.7% vs TC avg
Strong +31% interview lift
Without
With
+30.6%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 8m
Avg Prosecution
32 currently pending
Career history
629
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
69.0%
+29.0% vs TC avg
§102
17.6%
-22.4% vs TC avg
§112
11.5%
-28.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 593 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 4/14/2026 has been entered. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to the cl have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Allowable Subject Matter Claim 21-24 are objected to as being dependent upon a rejected base claim but would be allowable if rewritten in independent form including all of the limitations of the base claim and any intervening claims. The following is a statement of reasons for the indication of allowable subject matter: Regarding claim 21, the prior art does not disclose the claimed water heating system wherein the control system monitors the first temperature of the water at an outlet of the first heat exchanger; and modulate heat input to the first heat exchanger based on the first temperature of the water at the outlet of the first heat exchanger in lieu of utilizing the second temperature of the water at the domestic hot water outlet. Regarding claim 22, the prior art does not disclose the claimed water heating system wherein upon receipt of a request for a flow demand during the alternative mode of operation, the control system is further configured to initiate a normal startup procedure and upon completion of the startup procedure, modulate heat input to the first heat exchanger using an outlet temperature of the first heat exchanger as a target sensor value. Regarding claim 23, the prior art does not disclose the method for heating water in a water heater system comprising: monitoring the first temperature of the water at an outlet of the first heat exchanger during the alternative mode of operation; and modulating heat input to the first heat exchanger based on the first temperature instead of the second temperature. Regarding claim 24, the prior art does not disclose the method for heating water in a water heater system wherein the alternative mode of operation determines the set point value based on a presence of a mixing device, and: when no mixing device is present, the set point value is set to a currently saved set point value and the set point value does not exceed the first temperature of the water measured at the outlet of the first heat exchanger, when a mixing device is present, the set point value is set to a maximum-allowed set point value. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1,3-8,10,13,15-17, and 19-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Heo et al. (US 2022/0010976) and Zak et al. (US 2005/0077368). Regarding claim 1, Heo (H) discloses a water heater system, comprising: a first heat exchanger (120, Figure 2) configured to heat water; a first temperature sensor designed (120) to sense a first temperature of the water within the first heat exchanger; a second heat exchanger (110) configured to receive the water from the first heat exchanger via a water inlet (@126), and deliver the water to at least one of a domestic hot water outlet (140, [0034]) and the first heat exchanger (via 125); a second temperature sensor (142) designed to sense a second temperature of the water at the domestic hot water outlet; and a control system (105, [0024]) configured to: monitor the second temperature of the water with the second temperature sensor; initiate an alternative mode of operation to heat the water to a set point value, wherein the set point value is based on the first temperature of the water; and deliver water heated to the set point value to at least one of the domestic hot water outlet and the first heat exchanger ([0034-0037]). Heo (H) discloses all of the elements of the method of controlling the water temperature of a second heat exchanger based on parameters of a first heat exchanger temperature, but does not identify an abnormality in monitoring the second water temperature, wherein the abnormality is a failure or an interruption in monitoring the second water temperature; initiate an alternative mode of operation to heat the water to a set point value during the abnormality. However, Zak (Z) discloses a sensor diagnostic for water heaters (Abstract) that comprises two separately located temperature sensors (134,136) that identifies an abnormality in monitoring the second water temperature, wherein the abnormality is a failure or an interruption in monitoring the second water temperature; initiate an alternative mode of operation to heat the water to a set point value during the abnormality (Figure 5, [0066]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of this application to modify the heating method to provide an alternative heating scheme during detection of a malfunctioning temperature sensor interpolate a new set temperature that would ensure that the fluid was delivered at the correct temperature. Regarding claim 3, Heo (H), as modified, discloses the water heater system of claim 1, wherein the abnormality is a determination that a temperature of the domestic hot water outlet (116, via 134, Figure 2) is less than or greater than a threshold amount from a delivery temperature ([0066]). Regarding claim 4, Heo (H), as modified, discloses the water heater system of claim 1, wherein the first temperature of the water is monitored by at least one of the first temperature sensor positioned at an inlet at the first heat exchanger or an outlet at the first heat exchanger (H-120, 124, Figure 2), or a second temperature sensor positioned at the domestic hot water outlet of the second heat exchanger (H-142,110). Regarding claim 5, Heo (H), as modified, discloses the water heater system of claim 1, wherein the alternative mode of operation senses the first water temperature at an outlet of the first heat exchanger (H-124). Regarding claim 6, Heo (H), as modified, discloses the water heater system of claim 1, wherein the set point value is based on the first water temperature, and wherein the set point value is equal to a target delivery temperature (Claim 39). Regarding claim 7, Heo (H), as modified, discloses the water heater system of claim 1, wherein the set point value is a maximum temperature value for the domestic hot water outlet (524, Figure 5, i.e., boiling temperature point). Regarding claim 8, Heo (H), as modified, discloses the water heater system of claim 1, wherein the set point value is (i) set manually or (ii) set automatically by the control system ([0066]). Regarding claim 9, Heo (H), as modified, discloses the water heater system of claim 1, wherein the alternative mode of operation determines the set point value based on a presence of a mixing device, wherein: when the mixing device is present, the set point value is set to a maximum domestic hot water temperature, and when the mixing device is not detected the set point value is set to a standard set point value ([H-0047-0050]). Regarding claim 10, Heo (H), as modified, discloses the water heater system of claim 1, wherein the alternative mode of operation causes the first heat exchanger to heat water to the set point value (100, [0066]). Regarding claim 12, Heo (H), as modified, discloses the water heater system of claim 1, wherein the alternative mode of operation enables continuous delivery of hot water during the abnormality, and during a transition between the alternative mode of operation and a normal operation ([0069]). Regarding claim 13, Heo (H), as modified, discloses the water heater system of claim 1, wherein the control system is further configured to generate a notification upon initiation of the alternative mode of operation ([0071]). Regarding claim 15, Heo (H) discloses a method for heating water in a water heater system comprising a first heat exchanger (120, Figure 2) and second heat exchanger (110), comprising: receiving the water at the second heat exchanger from the first heat exchanger via a water inlet (@126); delivering the water from the second heat exchanger (110) to at least one of a domestic hot water outlet (@142) and the first heat exchanger; providing a first temperature sensor (124) designed to sense a first temperature of the water within the first heat exchanger; providing a second temperature sensor (142) designed to sense a second temperature of the water heated at the domestic hot water outlet; monitoring the second water temperature; initiating a mode of operation to heat the water to a set point value, wherein the set point value is no higher than the first temperature of the water; and delivering water heated to the set point value to at least one of the domestic hot water outlet and the first heat exchanger ([0034-0037]). Heo (H) discloses all of the elements of the method of controlling the water temperature of a second heat exchanger based on parameters of a first heat exchanger temperature, but does not identify an abnormality in monitoring the second temperature of the water, wherein the abnormality is a failure or an interruption in monitoring the second temperature of the water; initiate an alternative mode of operation to heat the water to a set point value during the abnormality. However, Zak (Z) discloses a sensor diagnostic for water heaters (Abstract) that comprises two separately located temperature sensors (134,135) that identifies an abnormality in monitoring the second temperature of the water, wherein the abnormality is a failure or an interruption in monitoring the second temperature of the water; initiate an alternative mode of operation to heat the water to a set point value during the abnormality (Figure 5, [0066]). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art prior to the effective filing date of this application to modify the heating method to provide an alternative heating scheme during detection of a malfunctioning temperature sensor interpolate a new set temperature that would ensure that the fluid was delivered at the correct temperature. Regarding claim 17, Heo (H), as modified, discloses the method of claim 15, wherein the set point value is a maximum temperature value for the domestic hot water outlet (524, Figure 5, i.e., boiling temperature point). Regarding claim 18, Heo (H), as modified, discloses the method of claim 15, wherein the alternative mode of operation determines the set point value based on a presence of a mixing device, wherein: when the mixing device is present, the set point value is set to a maximum domestic hot water temperature, and when the mixing device is not detected the set point value is set to a standard set point value ([H-0047-0050]). Regarding claim 19, Heo (H), as modified, discloses the method of claim 15, further comprising: continuously delivering hot water during the abnormality, and during a transition between the alternative mode operation and a normal operation ([0066]). Regarding claim 20, Heo (H), as modified, discloses the method of claim 15, further comprising: generating a notification upon initiation of the alternative mode operation ([0069]). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOHN E BARGERO whose telephone number is (571) 270-1770. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Helena Kosanovic can be reached at (571) 272-9059. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOHN E BARGERO/Examiner, Art Unit 3762 /HELENA KOSANOVIC/ Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3762
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 15 earlier events
Mar 10, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Mar 11, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 20, 2025
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
Sep 17, 2025
Response Filed
Jan 14, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §103
Apr 14, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Apr 21, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 15, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12728701
HEATING SYSTEM OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE
4y 3m to grant Granted Sep 08, 2026
Patent 12704263
COOKING APPLIANCE
3y 6m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12691727
REFRIGERATION CYCLE DEVICE
3y 4m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12693010
APPARATUS AND METHOD FOR COMBUSTION OF NATURAL GAS FROM PNEUMATIC CONTROLLERS
3y 1m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12669266
FURNACE
2y 4m to grant Granted Jun 30, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
55%
Grant Probability
86%
With Interview (+30.6%)
3y 8m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 593 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month