Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026
Application No. 17/350,137

Porous Silicon-Based Active Material For Negative Electrode And Lithium Secondary Battery Including The Same

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jun 17, 2021
Priority
Sep 17, 2013 — RE 10-2013-0111981 +2 more
Examiner
MARTIN, TRAVIS LYNDEN
Art Unit
1721
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
LG Chem Ltd.
OA Round
4 (Non-Final)
58%
Grant Probability
Moderate
4-5
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 58% of resolved cases
58%
Career Allowance Rate
38 granted / 65 resolved
-6.5% vs TC avg
Strong +44% interview lift
Without
With
+43.9%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 6m
Avg Prosecution
27 currently pending
Career history
89
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
43.3%
+3.3% vs TC avg
§102
28.6%
-11.4% vs TC avg
§112
26.5%
-13.5% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 65 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
DETAILED ACTION Introductory Notes Any paragraph citation of the instant is in reference to the U.S. published patent application. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claims 1 and 3-18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over FUJIWARA (JP 2004095306 A, listed on an IDS, machine translation used for citations) in view of TOSHIRO (JP 2013030355 A, machine translation used for citations) in view of BISWAL (US 20130045420 A1). Regarding claims 1, 3-4, 10 and 15-16, FUJIWARA discloses an active material for negative electrode (Abstract) comprising: silicon-based particles (“Si-containing particles” [0026]). FUJIWARA does not expressly teach the Si-containing particles are porous. BISWAL is directed to porous silicon particles for a lithium-ion battery such as that of modified FUJIWARA. BISWAL discloses “the methods of the present disclosure can allow users to control the thickness, pore diameter and porosity of the pores” [0075] as well as “the porous silicon films of the present disclosure may also be split into small porous silicon particles” [0064]. BISWAL teaches particles meeting the above characteristics as having “may have at least 3 times the capacity of the currently used anode materials for more than 550 cycles” [0077]. BISWAL further teaches the problems associated with the use of silicon, namely “volume expansion can result in severe cracking of the silicon, thereby leading to electrode failure. In fact, it is believed that lithiation-induced stress and structural destruction of silicon in batteries are the main cause for capacity loss during charge/discharge” [0024], and the teachings of BISWAL are aimed at addressing these problems. Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize the porous silicon particles of BISWAL as the Si-containing particles of FUJIWARA to increase capacity. Therefore, modified FUJIWARA discloses porous silicon-based particles (as taught by BISWAL). FUJIWARA further discloses carbon particles, wherein the carbon particles comprise fine carbon particles and coarse carbon particles respectively having different average particle diameters (“first graphite particles” and “second graphite particles” [0009]), wherein an average particle diameter (D50) of the fine carbon particles is in a range of 1 µm to 5 µm (“second graphite particles having a 50% particle size D50 of 2 to 10 μm” [0056] as well as example 5 in Table 1 with a second graphite particles D50 of 4 µm), wherein an average particle diameter (D50) of the coarse carbon particles is in a range of 10 µm to 30 µm (“first graphite particles having a 50% particle size D50 of 5 to 20 μm” [0056] as well as example 5 in Table with a first graphite particles D50 of 10 µm), wherein the shape of the fine carbon particles is spherical, point-like, scaly, or a mixture thereof (graphite reading on spherical, scaly and/or mixture thereof and it matches the graphite used in instant example 1 [0079]). FUJIWARA discloses a 2:1 ratio of first to second, or coarse to fine, graphite particles in paragraph [0063]. FUJIWARA does not expressly teach the coarse carbon particles are included in an amount of 70 wt% to 99 wt% based on the total weight of all of the fine carbon particles and coarse carbon particles. TOSHIRO is directed to negative electrode of a lithium-ion secondary battery like FUJIWARA. TOSHIRO discloses second graphitic carbon material B has a particle size smaller than the first graphitic carbon material A (Abstract), again like FUJIWARA. TOSHIRO discloses “the active material B is more preferably 20% to 30% by weight of the active material A” [0036] as well as example 2 with “active material A and negative electrode active material B in a mixing ratio of 80/20” [0050] thereby reading on the ranges of claims 1, 3, and 4) TOSHIRO teaches when the weight ratio of active material B (fine) is above the minimum “the voids can be filled” [0036] and when the weight ratio of active material B (fine) is below the maximum “it can suppress a decrease in capacity” [0036]. Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to balance the weights of coarse and fine particles in FUJIWARA to the 80:20 ratio of TOSHIRO in order to fill voids and retain capacity. Therefore, modified FUJIWARA discloses the coarse carbon particles are included in an amount of 70 wt% to 99 wt% based on the total weight of all of the fine carbon particles and coarse carbon particles, as well as associated limitations of dependent claims (as taught by TOSHIRO). Regarding claims 5 and 18, modified FUJIWARA discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and BISWAL further discloses an average particle diameter (D50) of the porous silicon-based particles is in a range of 1 μm to 12 μm (“porous silicon particles with diameters that range from about 1 μm to about 50 μm” [0005]). Overlapping ranges are prima facie obvious (see MPEP 2144.05, I). Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to select the overlapping portion of the claimed diameter range in order to arrive at favorable capacity characteristics over multiple charge/discharge cycles. Regarding claim 6, modified FUJIWARA discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and BISWAL further discloses an average pore diameter of the porous silicon-based particles is in a range of 30 nm to 500 nm (“porous silicon particles of the present disclosure may have pores with diameters of less than about 2 nm (i.e., micropores), between 2 nm and 50 nm (i.e., mesopores), more than about 50 nm (macropores), or combinations of such pore diameters” [0067] and a range of “1 nanometer to about 5 micrometers” [0067]; BISWAL also discloses Fig. 8C which “shows weak absorption at low pressures, corresponding to few micropores, and a steep adsorption curve at higher pressures, suggesting the presence of macropores” [0105]). Regarding claim 7, modified FUJIWARA discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and BISWAL further discloses a specific surface area (Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET)-SSA) of the porous silicon-based particles is in a range of 5 m2/g to 50 m2/g (in comparing the macroporous silicon micro-particulates of BISWAL’s invention and commercial silicon nanoparticles BISWAL states “BET surface area for macroporous silicon micro-particulates was 46.84 m2/g, whereas for silicon nanoparticles is 34.86 m2/g” [0123] as such notably both the macroporous silicon micro-particulates and the commercial silicon nanoparticles have surface areas falling within the claimed range). Regarding claim 8, modified FUJIWARA discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and BISWAL further discloses the porous silicon-based particles comprise porous SiOx (where 0<x<2) (“by adjusting the current density or HF concentration … When the supply of the fluoride ion is insufficient, it starts forming a silicon dioxide rather than SiF62- … leads to isotropic etching at the tip of the pores, thereby resulting in a layer of silicon that is more porous … ” [0084], emphasis added; notably similar to the instant use of HF as outlined in [0059]). Regarding claim 9, modified FUJIWARA discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and BISWAL further discloses the porous silicon-based particles are porous silicon (Si) particles (“porous silicon particles” Abstract). Regarding claim 11, modified FUJIWARA discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and FUJIWARA further discloses a shape of the coarse carbon particles is irregular, scaly, planar, fibrous, spherical, or a mixed shape thereof (graphite reading on irregular, scaly, planar, spherical and/or a mixed shape thereof and it matches the graphite used in instant example 1 [0079]). Regarding claim 12, modified FUJIWARA discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and FUJIWARA further discloses the porous silicon-based particles and the carbon particles are mixed together or composited by mechanical milling (“mixing” [0063]). Regarding claims 13 and 14, modified FUJIWARA discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and FUJIWARA further discloses a negative electrode comprising the active material ([0063]) and a lithium secondary battery ([0067]). Regarding claim 17, modified FUJIWARA discloses all the claim limitations as set forth above and FUJIWARA further discloses the fine carbon particles are disposed between the porous silicon-based particles and the coarse carbon particles (via mixing there are numerous instances of fine carbon particles between silicon-based particles and coarse carbon particles throughout the mixture). Claim 2 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over FUJIWARA in view of TOSHIRO in view of BISWAL in view of KONISHI (US 20130164618 A1). Regarding claim 2, modified FUJIWARA does not expressly teach a mixing ratio of the porous silicon-based particles to the carbon particles is in a range of 1:1 to 1:20 as a weight ratio. KONISHI is directed to negative electrode active material, like modified FUJIWARA. KONISHI also similarly discloses the use of two carbon materials of differing sizes (first active material with D50 15 μm to 20 μm [0031] and second active material with D50 10 μm or less [0019]) as well a third active material which contains silicon [0020], like FUJIWARA. KONISHI discloses the “third active material is 1 wt % to 10 wt % of the total weight of the negative electrode active material” [0022] as well as example 1 [0092] with a 10:90 ratio of silicon containing material to total carbon materials. Regarding the amount of silicon containing material, KONISHI teaches being above a minimum “to adequately ensure the effect of increasing the capacity” [0050] and being below a maximum “to successfully avoid the problem due to the volume change” [0050]. Before the effective filing date of the claimed invention, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to utilize the ratio of silicon containing material to total carbon materials of KONISHI in the mixture of FUJIWARA to increase the capacity while avoiding problems due to volume change. Therefore, modified FUJIWARA discloses a mixing ratio of the porous silicon-based particles to the carbon particles is in a range of 1:1 to 1:20 as a weight ratio (as taught by KONISHI). Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments with respect to the claims have been considered and are persuasive. Notably this action is non-final. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to TRAVIS L MARTIN whose telephone number is (703)756-5449. The examiner can normally be reached M-F, 8am-5pm ET. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Allison Bourke can be reached at (303)297-4684. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /T.L.M./Examiner, Art Unit 1721 /ALLISON BOURKE/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1721
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 4 earlier events
Oct 01, 2025
Interview Requested
Oct 09, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Oct 09, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Nov 06, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 07, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 12, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103
May 11, 2026
Response Filed
Jun 05, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12706318
VOLTAGE MEASURING DEVICE FOR MEASURING THE VOLTAGE OF A PLURALITY OF ELECTROCHEMICAL CELLS OF AN ELECTROCHEMICAL REACTOR
4y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12706340
BATTERY PACK
4y 2m to grant Granted Aug 11, 2026
Patent 12700611
SECONDARY BATTERY
3y 9m to grant Granted Aug 04, 2026
Patent 12695121
NON-AQUEOUS ELECTROLYTES FOR BATTERIES
4y 6m to grant Granted Jul 28, 2026
Patent 12689072
METHOD FOR DETECTING LITHIUM PLATING, AND METHOD AND DEVICE FOR MANAGING BATTERY BY USING SAME
3y 11m to grant Granted Jul 21, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

4-5
Expected OA Rounds
58%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+43.9%)
3y 6m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 65 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month