Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/372,430

SECURE ENVIRONMENT FOR A MACHINE LEARNING MODEL GENERATION PLATFORM

Non-Final OA §112
Filed
Jul 10, 2021
Priority
Mar 31, 2021 — CIP of 17/219,699
Examiner
STARKS, WILBERT L
Art Unit
2122
Tech Center
2100 — Computer Architecture & Software
Assignee
Aixplain, Inc.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
76%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
80%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 76% — above average
76%
Career Allowance Rate
495 granted / 656 resolved
+20.5% vs TC avg
Minimal +4% lift
Without
With
+4.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 4m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
704
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
29.1%
-10.9% vs TC avg
§103
19.2%
-20.8% vs TC avg
§102
46.6%
+6.6% vs TC avg
§112
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 656 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Claims 1-7 and 9-20 have been examined. Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claim Rejections - 35 U.S.C. § 112 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph: The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the applicant regards as his invention. Claims 1-7 and 9-20 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) or 35 U.S.C. 112 (pre-AIA ), second paragraph, as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor (or for applications subject to pre-AIA 35 U.S.C. 112, the applicant), regards as the invention. Specifically, independent Claims 1, 9, and 16 contain the limitation: “governs access privileges and optionally is stored on a blockchain”. In the broadest reasonable interpretation, the storage on the blockchain may, or may not be performed, and it, therefore, indeterminate. This defect is incorporated by reference to the dependent claims. Correction is required. Conclusion Any inquiries concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to Wilbert L. Starks, Jr., who may be reached Monday through Friday, between 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. EST. or via telephone at (571) 272-3691 or email: Wilbert.Starks@uspto.gov. If you need to send an Official facsimile transmission, please send it to (571) 273-8300. If attempts to reach the examiner are unsuccessful the Examiner’s Supervisor (SPE), Kakali Chaki, may be reached at (571) 272-3719. Hand-delivered responses should be delivered to the Receptionist @ (Customer Service Window Randolph Building 401 Dulany Street, Alexandria, VA 22313), located on the first floor of the south side of the Randolph Building. Finally, information regarding the status of an application may be obtained from the Patent Application Information Retrieval (PAIR) system. Moreover, status information for published applications may be obtained from either Private PAIR or Public PAIR. Status information for unpublished applications is available through Private PAIR only. For more information about the PAIR system, see http://pair-direct.uspto.gov. Should you have any questions on access to the Private PAIR system, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) toll-free @ 1-866-217-9197. /WILBERT L STARKS/ Primary Examiner, Art Unit 2122 WLS 05 MAR 2026
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 2 earlier events
Dec 05, 2024
Interview Requested
Dec 19, 2024
Examiner Interview Summary
Dec 19, 2024
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Dec 25, 2024
Response Filed
Apr 10, 2025
Final Rejection mailed — §112
Oct 10, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Oct 15, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 09, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12626116
Integrated Optical Neuromorphic Computing Apparatus
4y 10m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12561587
DATA PROCESSING METHOD, ELECTRONIC DEVICE, AND STORAGE MEDIUM
11m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12555007
METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR INFERRING DEVICE FINGERPRINT
3y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12541694
GENERATING A DOMAIN-SPECIFIC KNOWLEDGE GRAPH FROM UNSTRUCTURED COMPUTER TEXT
5y 2m to grant Granted Feb 03, 2026
Patent 12525251
METHOD, SYSTEM AND PROGRAM PRODUCT FOR PERCEIVING AND COMPUTING EMOTIONS
6y 3m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
76%
Grant Probability
80%
With Interview (+4.1%)
3y 4m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 656 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month