Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026
Application No. 17/386,820

DEVICE AND METHOD FOR RAPID MANUFACTURING OF MULTIFUNCTIONAL COMPOSITES

Final Rejection §112
Filed
Jul 28, 2021
Priority
Jul 28, 2020 — provisional 63/057,658
Examiner
DANIELS, MATTHEW J
Art Unit
1742
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Colorado State University Research Foundation
OA Round
6 (Final)
69%
Grant Probability
Favorable
7-8
OA Rounds
0m
Est. Remaining
94%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 69% — above average
69%
Career Allowance Rate
490 granted / 709 resolved
+4.1% vs TC avg
Strong +25% interview lift
Without
With
+25.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 1m
Avg Prosecution
38 currently pending
Career history
768
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.6%
-39.4% vs TC avg
§103
79.2%
+39.2% vs TC avg
§102
7.1%
-32.9% vs TC avg
§112
12.9%
-27.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 709 resolved cases

Office Action

§112
DETAILED ACTION Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 The following is a quotation of the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. 112(a): (a) IN GENERAL.—The specification shall contain a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, concise, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains, or with which it is most nearly connected, to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor or joint inventor of carrying out the invention. The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 112(b): (b) CONCLUSION.—The specification shall conclude with one or more claims particularly pointing out and distinctly claiming the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. Claim 21 is rejected under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) as new matter and/or 35 U.S.C. 112(b), as being indefinite for failing to particularly point out and distinctly claim the subject matter which the inventor or a joint inventor regards as the invention. As to claim 21, in the case that there is only “one” and not a plurality of sheet heaters, it is unclear how the one sheet heater can be electrically coupled together as claimed, which renders the claim indefinite. The support from the specification suggests “electrically coupling the electrodes 142 of the heaters 140 together”, not coupling the electrodes of a single heater together, which is also a new matter issue since support only appears to exist for multiple heaters. If the stated condition (“coupling…together”) only occurs when there are a plurality of sheet heaters, then the claim should be revised to reflect this scope. Allowable Subject Matter Claims 1-3, 5-7, 9-19, 22, and 44 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: The amendment to claim 1 distinguishes over the best available prior art already discussed in the file. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW J DANIELS whose telephone number is (313)446-4826. The examiner can normally be reached Monday-Friday, 8:30-5:00 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Christina Johnson can be reached at 571-272-1176. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW J DANIELS/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1742
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Show 27 earlier events
Oct 25, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 25, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Sep 08, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Nov 03, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 04, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 20, 2026
Non-Final Rejection mailed — §112
Apr 06, 2026
Response Filed
May 15, 2026
Final Rejection mailed — §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12637379
SUPPORT STRUCTURES FOR ACCOMMODATING THERMAL EXPANSION AND GLASS MANUFACTURING APPARATUSES COMPRISING THE SAME
2y 8m to grant Granted May 26, 2026
Patent 12631816
Light-Guide Sunroof Assembly
1y 7m to grant Granted May 19, 2026
Patent 12623412
Forming End Effector and Methods of Use
2y 3m to grant Granted May 12, 2026
Patent 12611014
LUGGAGE FORMED BY COMPOSITE MATERIAL AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF
2y 10m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Patent 12611823
In-Tool Compaction for Composite Structures
2y 7m to grant Granted Apr 28, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

Strategy Recommendation AI-generated — please review before filing

Get a prosecution strategy drawn from examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Typically takes 5-10 seconds — AI-generated, attorney review required before filing

Prosecution Projections

7-8
Expected OA Rounds
69%
Grant Probability
94%
With Interview (+25.4%)
3y 1m (~0m remaining)
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 709 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allowance rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month