Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/412,978

MECHANICAL VENTILATOR

Final Rejection §102
Filed
Aug 26, 2021
Examiner
BOECKER, JOSEPH D
Art Unit
3785
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Goldman Sephoric LLC
OA Round
4 (Final)
83%
Grant Probability
Favorable
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 0m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 83% — above average
83%
Career Allow Rate
728 granted / 875 resolved
+13.2% vs TC avg
Strong +23% interview lift
Without
With
+23.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 0m
Avg Prosecution
50 currently pending
Career history
925
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.3%
-37.7% vs TC avg
§103
34.2%
-5.8% vs TC avg
§102
22.1%
-17.9% vs TC avg
§112
29.2%
-10.8% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 875 resolved cases

Office Action

§102
DETAILED ACTION The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment The Amendment filed 02 Jan 2026 has been entered. Claims 1-8 and 11-22 are pending in the application. Claims 1-3, 5-6, 14-15, 17-18 and 20-22 are currently amended. Applicant’s amendment to the Claims have overcome each and every objection and 35 U.S.C. 112 rejection previously set forth in the Non-Final Office Action mailed 02 Jul 2025. The claims are no longer interpreted as invoking 35 U.S.C. 112(f) following the amendment to the claims. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 02 Jan 2026 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Regarding claim 22, Applicant argues that Davenport (U.S. Pub. 2009/0199855) fails to disclose any programming to modify a property of the output gas of the flow outlet airline as a function of the respiratory element (Pg. 7). Applicant acknowledges that Davenport uses its controller to control the opening and closing of valves (Pg. 7). It is respectfully submitted that Davenport performs those valve movement controls in specific relation to portions of an inhalation and exhalation breath curve analysis (Fig. 3; ¶¶0053-0055). The analyzed inhalation and exhalation breath curve is readable on the respiratory element of the claim and thus the controlled opening and closing of valves must be understood to modify the delivered flow pattern (e.g. Fig. 3 #68, 70, 72; ¶0058) based upon the analyzed inhalation and exhalation breath curve (i.e. the “respiratory element”). Davenport is thus still found to anticipate claim 22. Terminal Disclaimer The terminal disclaimer filed on 02 Jan 2026 disclaiming the terminal portion of any patent granted on this application which would extend beyond the expiration date of U.S. Patent 11,400,250 and U.S. Appn. 17/858,261 has been reviewed and is accepted. The terminal disclaimer has been recorded. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 22 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Davenport (U.S. Pub. 2009/0199855). Regarding claim 22, Davenport discloses a breathing system (Figs. 1-2), comprising: a tubing (¶0050 – exiting source 12) configured to receive an input gas (¶0050 – gas from source 12); a breathing tubing (Fig. 2 #53; ¶0057); a patient interface (Fig. 2 #50; ¶0057); a flow outlet airline (Fig. 2 #48; ¶0056) in fluid communication with the tubing and the patient interface, wherein the flow outlet airline is configured to supply an output gas to a user via the patient interface (Fig. 2); a breath detection airline (Fig. 2 where #53 enters #6 and leads to #32) in fluid communication with the breathing tubing; a breath sensor (Fig. 2 #32; ¶0052) in fluid communication with the breath detection airline, wherein the breath sensor is configured to measure breathing pressure from the user (¶0052), and to generate sensor data as a function of breathing pressure of the user (¶0052), and wherein the breath sensor is fluidly separated from the flow outlet airline such that there is no signal interference from different simultaneously occurring gas flows (¶¶0057, 0129 – fluidly separated via divided cannula); and a controller (Fig. 2 #34; ¶0053) in electronic communication with the breath sensor, wherein the controller is programmed to compute a respiratory element of the user as a function of the sensor data (¶¶0053-0055 – e.g. portions of inhalation and exhalation as shown in Fig. 3), and wherein the controller is programmed to modify a property of the output gas (e.g. Fig. 3 #68, 70, 72; ¶0058) of the flow outlet airline as a function of the respiratory element (¶¶0053-0055, 0058). Allowable Subject Matter Claim(s) 1-8 and 11-21 are allowed. The following is an examiner’s statement of reasons for allowance: claims 1 and 21 remain allowed over the prior art for the same reasons stated in the preceding Office action. Any comments considered necessary by applicant must be submitted no later than the payment of the issue fee and, to avoid processing delays, should preferably accompany the issue fee. Such submissions should be clearly labeled “Comments on Statement of Reasons for Allowance.” Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to JOSEPH D BOECKER whose telephone number is (571)270-0376. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:00 AM - 4:00 PM. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Kendra Carter can be reached at (571) 272-9034. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /JOSEPH D. BOECKER/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 3785
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 26, 2021
Application Filed
Jun 03, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Nov 26, 2024
Response Filed
Jan 06, 2025
Final Rejection — §102
Jan 17, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 17, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 11, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Mar 12, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
May 12, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
May 14, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 30, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102
Jan 02, 2026
Response Filed
Jan 23, 2026
Final Rejection — §102 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12594392
MOVABLE TIP BOUGIE DEVICE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12589213
MECHANICAL VENTILATOR WITH NON-INVASIVE OPTION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12589215
MECHANICAL RESPIRATOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 31, 2026
Patent 12582788
MODULAR PATIENT INTERFACE INCLUDING A JOINT COUPLING MOUTH AND NASAL CUSHIONS
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 24, 2026
Patent 12576226
CHARACTERISING SYSTEMS FOR RESPIRATORY THERAPY
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
83%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+23.1%)
3y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 875 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month