Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/420,959

POLYMER EMBEDDED ELECTRODES FOR BATTERIES

Non-Final OA §103
Filed
Jul 06, 2021
Examiner
GODO, OLATUNJI A
Art Unit
1752
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
URBAN ELECTRIC POWER INC.
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
86%
Grant Probability
Favorable
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 5m
To Grant
95%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 86% — above average
86%
Career Allow Rate
950 granted / 1106 resolved
+20.9% vs TC avg
Moderate +9% lift
Without
With
+9.1%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 5m
Avg Prosecution
30 currently pending
Career history
1136
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.5%
-39.5% vs TC avg
§103
45.7%
+5.7% vs TC avg
§102
32.1%
-7.9% vs TC avg
§112
16.4%
-23.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 1106 resolved cases

Office Action

§103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . DETAILED ACTION Continued Examination under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 10/30/25 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102 of this title, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. 1. Claims 1-3, 6-9, 36 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kwon et al. (US20140377620) in view of Cho et al. (US20040241549). 2. Regarding claim 1, Kwon teaches a battery comprising: an anode; a cathode; a separator disposed between the anode and the cathode; and an electrolyte (In addition, the present disclosure provides a secondary battery comprising a cathode, an anode, a separator interposed between the cathode and the anode, and an electrolyte [0111]), wherein at least one of the anode or the cathode comprises an electroactive material disposed in contact with a polymer substrate to form an electrode material sheet, wherein the polymer substrate is a porous or a nonporous sheet, wherein the polymer substrate is embedded within and is sandwiched between two layers of the electroactive material, and wherein the electrode material sheet is in electrical contact with a current collector (see Fig. below). PNG media_image1.png 432 956 media_image1.png Greyscale 3. Kwon is silent about the components of the active material 4. Cho teaches a negative electrode comprising active material layer (see Fig. below) for the benefit of a rechargeable lithium battery exhibiting an improved cycle life characteristic [0003]. PNG media_image2.png 432 796 media_image2.png Greyscale 5. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kwon with Cho’s teachings for the benefit of a rechargeable lithium battery exhibiting an improved cycle life characteristic. 6. The battery of claim 1, wherein the battery is a primary battery or a secondary battery (The present disclosure provides a sheet-form electrode for a secondary battery (abstract)). 7. The battery of claim 1, wherein the battery is prismatic or cylindrical (cylindrical shape, see Figure 9). 8. The battery of claim 1, wherein the anode comprises lithium, sodium, magnesium, aluminum, zinc, lead, or iron (lithium-titanium complex oxide (LTO), and metals (Me) Li, Zn, Mg, and Fe [0029]). 9. The battery of claim 1, wherein the cathode comprises lead oxide, manganese oxide, or intercalating materials (an active material selected from the group consisting of LiCoO2, LiNiO2, LiMn2O4 [0029]) 10. The battery of claim 1, wherein the separator comprises nylon, polyester, (polyesters [0048]) 11. The battery of claim 1, wherein the electrolyte is an aqueous electrolyte or a nonaqueous electrolyte (electrolyte which is not particularly limited to its kinds and may be selected from a non-aqueous electrolyte solution [0132]). 12. The battery of claim 1, wherein the electrolyte is an aqueous electrolyte, and wherein the aqueous electrolyte is alkaline electrolyte, neutral electrolyte, acidic electrolyte, aqueous gelled electrolyte, or any combinations thereof (a gel polymer electrolyte [0042]; water is added to prepare a polymer solution [0103]). 13. The battery of claim 1, wherein the electrolyte is a nonaqueous electrolyte, and wherein the nonaqueous electrolyte is organic electrolyte, ionic liquid, polymer solid electrolyte, or any combinations thereof (a solid electrolyte using PEO [0042]). 14. The battery of claim 1, wherein the polymer substrate (The porous polymer layer 30 may have a porous structure for good introduction of an electrolyte solution in an electrode active material layer, and have a pore size of 0.01 to 10 μm and a porosity of 5 to 95% [0101]; The porous coating layer may be formed to have a porous structure through phase separation or phase change by a non-solvent during its preparation [0102]) comprises a conductive coating (The polymer may be a linear polymer with polarity, an oxide-based linear polymer [0089-0090]) 15. Claims 8 and 35 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Kwon et al. (US20140377620) in view of Cho et al. (US20040241549) as applied to claim 1 in view of Yadav et al. (US 20200083559, PFCT filed: 5/4/2018). 16. Regarding claims 8 and 35, the complete discussion of Kwon as applied to claim 1 is incorporated herein. Secondary batteries have a cylindrical, prismatic, or pouch shape [0005]. 17. Kwon teaches wherein the electrode material sheet comprises: a first layer comprising the polymer substrate embedded within and sandwiched between the two layers of the electroactive material (see Fig. below). PNG media_image1.png 432 956 media_image1.png Greyscale and a second layer comprising a second polymer substrate embedded within and sandwiched between two additional layers of the electroactive material, wherein the current collector is sandwiched between the first layer and the second layer (see Fig. below) PNG media_image3.png 304 850 media_image3.png Greyscale 18. However, they are silent about the limitations of claim 8. 19. Yadav teaches the electrolyte can be acidic, alkaline, ionic liquids, organic-based, solid-phase, gelled, etc. or combinations thereof [0034] for the benefit of improving the safety and the economics of the battery [0003]. 20. It would have been obvious to a person having ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to have modified Kwon with first and second layers for the cathode and anode, in addition to Yadav’s teachings for the benefit of improving the safety and the economics of the battery. Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to OLATUNJI GODO whose telephone number is (571)272-3104. The examiner can normally be reached 8:00 am - 5:30 pm. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Nicholas Smith can be reached on 571-272-8760. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /OLATUNJI A GODO/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1752
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 06, 2021
Application Filed
Dec 14, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §103
Mar 13, 2025
Response Filed
Jul 01, 2025
Final Rejection — §103
Sep 11, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 30, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Nov 02, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jan 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12603346
THERMAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FOR RECHARGEABLE BATTERIES
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12603318
DISTRIBUTED LARGE-SCALE SYSTEM OF ALL-VANADIUM REDOX FLOW BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597591
ELECTRODE FOR SECONDARY BATTERIES, AND SECONDARY BATTERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597623
GENERATING POWER FROM RECYCLED HYDROCARBON GAS
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12597616
SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONTROLLING HYDROGEN STACK CURRENT AND LOAD
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
86%
Grant Probability
95%
With Interview (+9.1%)
2y 5m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 1106 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month