Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/422,193

SGLT-2 INHIBITORS OR IL-1R ANTAGONISTS FOR REDUCTION OF HYPOGLYCAEMIA AFTER BARIATRIC SURGERY

Final Rejection §102§112
Filed
Jul 11, 2021
Examiner
GEORGE, DENNIS CHERIAN
Art Unit
1644
Tech Center
1600 — Biotechnology & Organic Chemistry
Assignee
UNIVERSITÄTSSPITAL BASEL
OA Round
2 (Final)
25%
Grant Probability
At Risk
3-4
OA Rounds
2y 8m
To Grant
0%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants only 25% of cases
25%
Career Allow Rate
2 granted / 8 resolved
-35.0% vs TC avg
Minimal -25% lift
Without
With
+-25.0%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
2y 8m
Avg Prosecution
17 currently pending
Career history
25
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.5%
-37.5% vs TC avg
§103
24.9%
-15.1% vs TC avg
§102
18.8%
-21.2% vs TC avg
§112
26.9%
-13.1% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 8 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §112
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Status of Claims Applicant’s amendment filed on 05/19/2025 is acknowledged. Following the amendment, claims 8, 10, and 13 are amended. Claims 7-13 are currently pending and under examination. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 112 Applicant’s arguments, see pg. 4, filed 05/19/2025, with respect to rejection of claim 13 under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) have been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection of claim 13 under 35 U.S.C. 112(a) has been withdrawn. In addition, applicant’s arguments, with respect to rejection of claims 8, 10, and 13 under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) have also been fully considered and are persuasive. The rejection of claims 8, 10, 13 under 35 U.S.C. 112(b) has been withdrawn. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claims 7-13 remain rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by clinical trial NCT03200782 (first posted 06/27/2017). Regarding claims 7-12, NCT03200782 (‘782) teaches a study to investigate whether hypoglycaemia observed after food intake in patients post bariatric surgery can be influenced via inhibition of inflammation with a human interlukin-1 receptor antagonist (Summary). Trial ‘782 specifies the use of anakinra as an active comparator with a dosage of 100mg, three hours before meal intake (Arms and Interventions). Trial ‘782 teaches bariatric operation types to include sleeve gastrectomy and roux-y-gastric bypass in patients with documented hypoglycemia and hypoglycaemic symptoms (Inclusion Criteria). Regarding claim 13, instant application specification teaches that anakinra is a non-agonist antibody or antagonist that binds to IL-1 receptor type 1 (pg. 4, lines 11-15). Trial ‘782 discloses treating patients with anakinra following bariatric surgery in order to limit postprandial hypoglycemia (Brief Summary, Detailed Description). Therefore, Clinical Trial NCT03200782 anticipates claims 7-13. Applicant's arguments filed 05/19/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant makes the argument on pg. 4 of remarks that Trial ‘782 is “merely speculative” and that it does not teach all the limitations of the subject claims and therefore do not anticipate the pending claims. Examiner disagrees as Trial ‘782 discloses all the limitations presented in the instant application as discussed above. Applicant’s disclosure of the mechanistic connection between upregulation of inflammatory markers and hypoglycemia in post bariatric surgery subjects does not preclude anticipation by Trial ‘782 of the current limitations in claims 7-13 of the present application. Anticipation is based on whether the intended use of the present claims was already taught and not on whether the prior art articulated the why (see MPEP 2131, MPEP 2121(III)). As noted in MPEP 2121(III), “proof of efficacy is not required for a prior art reference to be enabling for purposes of anticipation." Impax Labs. Inc. v. Aventis Pharm. Inc., 468 F.3d 1366, 1383, 81 USPQ2d 1001, 1013 (Fed. Cir. 2006) (citing Rasmusson v. SmithKline Beecham Corp., 413 F.3d 1318, 1326, 75 USPQ2d 1297, 1302 (Fed. Cir. 2005)). Furthermore, a newly discovered mechanistic rationale for an old use does not make the use novel (see MPEP 2112 (I); Atlas Powder Co. v. IRECO Inc., 190 F.3d 1342, 1347, 51 USPQ2d 1943, 1947 (Fed. Cir. 1999). Since the instant application limitations are focused on the intended use of a method incorporating an IL-1 antagonist to inhibit development of hypoglycemia in subjects following bariatric surgery, the prior art reference of Trial ‘782 teaches the intended use, the population group and meets the instant application claim limitations. Conclusion No claims are allowable. THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to DENNIS GEORGE whose telephone number is (571)270-0340. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 8:30am - 5pm EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Daniel E Kolker can be reached at (571)272-3181. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /DENNIS GEORGE/Examiner, Art Unit 1644 /DANIEL E KOLKER/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 1644
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Jul 11, 2021
Application Filed
Dec 11, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §112
May 19, 2025
Response Filed
Aug 25, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §112 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12371476
CANINE PARVOVIRUS (CPV) NANOBODY CPV-VHH-H1 AND USE THEREOF
2y 5m to grant Granted Jul 29, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 1 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
25%
Grant Probability
0%
With Interview (-25.0%)
2y 8m
Median Time to Grant
Moderate
PTA Risk
Based on 8 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month