Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/430,581

ORAL TREATMENT GUIDE PLATE

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Aug 12, 2021
Examiner
TO, HOLLY T
Art Unit
3772
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Beijing Yakebot Technology Co. Ltd.
OA Round
9 (Non-Final)
50%
Grant Probability
Moderate
9-10
OA Rounds
3y 7m
To Grant
83%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 50% of resolved cases
50%
Career Allow Rate
54 granted / 109 resolved
-20.5% vs TC avg
Strong +33% interview lift
Without
With
+33.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 7m
Avg Prosecution
34 currently pending
Career history
143
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
2.4%
-37.6% vs TC avg
§103
49.3%
+9.3% vs TC avg
§102
20.0%
-20.0% vs TC avg
§112
26.7%
-13.3% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 109 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Continued Examination Under 37 CFR 1.114 A request for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, including the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e), was filed in this application after final rejection. Since this application is eligible for continued examination under 37 CFR 1.114, and the fee set forth in 37 CFR 1.17(e) has been timely paid, the finality of the previous Office action has been withdrawn pursuant to 37 CFR 1.114. Applicant's submission filed on 2/12/2026 has been entered. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The following is a quotation of the appropriate paragraphs of 35 U.S.C. 102 that form the basis for the rejections under this section made in this Office action: A person shall be entitled to a patent unless – (a)(1) the claimed invention was patented, described in a printed publication, or in public use, on sale, or otherwise available to the public before the effective filing date of the claimed invention. Claim(s) 1 and 13 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Zhong (CN 107440808 A, see machine trans. Ver.). Re. Claim 1, Zhong discloses an oral treatment guide plate (Fig. 1-3; Abstract), comprising a guide plate body (2/5/6; Par. 11; Annotated Figure A of Fig. 2), a saliva suction main tube (3; Par. 11; Annotated Figure A of Fig. 2), and a plurality of saliva suction branch tubes (1; Par. 11; Annotated Figure A of Fig. 2); at least two notches (see Fig. 1 and 2 where the 3 rubber bands denoted as element 5 that make up the guide plate body makes openings which can be considered notches) are formed on the guide plate body (Fig. 1-3, wherein the at least two notches are configured to engage with an area where a tooth is missing (It is fully capable that the bands be engaged with an area where a tooth is missing by wrapping onto teeth surrounding the missing tooth area); the saliva suction branch tubes are arranged on both sides of the at least two notches (Fig. 1), and extend along one or more surfaces of the guide plate body to reach the most distal notches of the at least two notches at a left side and a right side of the guide plate body respectively (Fig. 1 and 3); outlets of the saliva suction branch tubes are connected to an inlet of the saliva suction main tube (Fig. 1; Annotated Figure A of Fig. 2); an outlet of the saliva suction main tube is configured to connect with a suction device (See Fig. 1-3 where the other end of the main tube is fully capable of being connected to a suction device as a vacuum source needs to be present for the saliva to be ejected; Annotated Figure A of Fig. 2); wherein the saliva suction branch tubes comprise a lingual saliva suction tube (Annotated Figure B of Fig. 3) that is provided with a plurality of first suction holes (4) on a side positioned toward the tongue (Fig. 3) and a buccal saliva suction tube (Annotated Figure B of Fig. 3) that is provided with a plurality of second suction holes (4) on a side positioned toward the buccal mucosa (Fig. 3), and wherein the following is applied: the plurality of first suction holes are concentrated in a first local area (see Fig. 2-3) near a distal end of the lingual saliva suction tube in a first direction (Fig. 2-3 where it is concentrated at the distal end), and are distributed in the first direction and a second direction in the first local area, where the first direction is an extending direction of the lingual saliva suction tube, and the second direction is perpendicular to the first direction (The Second direction is extending upwards towards the direction of the teeth extension which is found to be perpendicular to the first direction which is found to follow the extension of the tube towards the distal end). PNG media_image1.png 666 1052 media_image1.png Greyscale Annotated Figure A PNG media_image2.png 528 817 media_image2.png Greyscale Annotated Figure B Re. Claim 13, Ellenbecker discloses an oral treatment guide plate assembly (Fig. 1-3; Abstract), comprising: a guide plate body (2/5/6; Par. 11; Annotated Figure A of Fig. 2) defining at least one notch (see Fig. 1 and 2 where the 3 rubber bands denoted as element 5 that make up the guide plate body makes openings which can be considered notches) configured to engage with an area where a tooth is missing (It is fully capable that the bands be engaged with an area where a tooth is missing by wrapping onto teeth surrounding the missing tooth area), the notch defining a lingual side and a buccal side (Fig. 1 and 3 where it would define a lingual and buccal side by separating the plurality of suction tubes to either sides to be fitted on the lingual and buccal side accordingly); a saliva suction main tube (3; Par. 11; Annotated Figure A of Fig. 2) mounted with respect to the guide plate body (Fig. 1 and 3 where it is mounted to the respect to the guide plate body by being connected to the guide plate body), the saliva suction main tube defining an inlet (Fig. 1; Annotated Figure A of Fig. 2) and an outlet (Fig. 1; Annotated Figure A of Fig. 2), wherein the outlet is configured to connect with a suction device (See Fig. 1-3 where the other end of the main tube is fully capable of being connected to a suction device as a vacuum source needs to be present for the saliva to be ejected; Annotated Figure A of Fig. 2); and a plurality of saliva suction branch tubes (1; Par. 11; Annotated Figure A of Fig. 2) fluidly connected to the inlet of the saliva suction main tube (Fig. 1; Annotated Figure A of Fig. 2), a lingual saliva suction branch tube of the plurality of saliva suction branch tubes is positioned in proximity to the lingual side of the notch (Annotated Figure B of Fig. 3) and is provided with a plurality of first suction holes (4) positioned on a side toward the tongue (Fig. 3), and a buccal saliva suction branch tube of the plurality of saliva suction branch tubes is positioned in proximity to the buccal side of the notch (Annotated Figure B of Fig. 3) and is provided with a plurality of second suction holes (4) positioned on a side toward the buccal mucosa (Fig. 3), and wherein the following is applied: the plurality of first suction holes are concentrated in a first local area (see Fig. 2-3) near a distal end of the lingual saliva suction tube in a first direction (Fig. 2-3 where it is concentrated at the distal end), and are distributed in the first direction and a second direction in the first local area, where the first direction is an extending direction of the lingual saliva suction tube, and the second direction is perpendicular to the first direction (The Second direction is extending upwards towards the direction of the teeth extension which is found to be perpendicular to the first direction which is found to follow the extension of the tube towards the distal end). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The following is a quotation of 35 U.S.C. 103 which forms the basis for all obviousness rejections set forth in this Office action: A patent for a claimed invention may not be obtained, notwithstanding that the claimed invention is not identically disclosed as set forth in section 102, if the differences between the claimed invention and the prior art are such that the claimed invention as a whole would have been obvious before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to a person having ordinary skill in the art to which the claimed invention pertains. Patentability shall not be negated by the manner in which the invention was made. Claim(s) 5 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Zhong (CN 107440808 A, see machine trans. Ver.) in view of Wenof (US 3084440 A). Re. Claim 5, Zhong discloses the oral treatment guide plate of claim 1, but is silent to the outlet of the saliva suction main tube is provided with a tapered tube joint. Wenoff discloses a dental suction device in the same field of endeavor and further discloses an outlet (25) of a saliva suction tube (23) wherein the outlet is provided with a tapered tube joint (Fig. 2 shows the outlet being tapered) to secure the connection between the suction device and suction source. It would have been obvious to someone skilled in the art before the effective filing date to have modified the saliva suction main tube of Zhong as taught by Wenof to secure the connection between the suction device and suction source. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments with respect to claim(s) have been considered but are moot because the new ground of rejection does not rely on any reference applied in the prior rejection of record for any teaching or matter specifically challenged in the argument. Conclusion The prior art made of record and not relied upon is considered pertinent to applicant’s disclosure. See Form PTO-892. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to HOLLY T TO whose telephone number is (571)272-0719. The examiner can normally be reached Monday - Thursday 6:30 - 4:30. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Edelmira Bosques can be reached at (571) 270-5614. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /HOLLY T. TO/Examiner, Art Unit 3772 /EDELMIRA BOSQUES/Supervisory Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3772
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Aug 12, 2021
Application Filed
Apr 21, 2023
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jul 12, 2023
Response Filed
Sep 17, 2023
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Dec 20, 2023
Request for Continued Examination
Dec 28, 2023
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 21, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jun 24, 2024
Response Filed
Aug 09, 2024
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Oct 08, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 30, 2024
Response after Non-Final Action
Oct 30, 2024
Request for Continued Examination
Jan 13, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Mar 26, 2025
Response Filed
Apr 22, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
May 23, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jul 25, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Jul 31, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Aug 26, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Nov 18, 2025
Response Filed
Dec 10, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Feb 12, 2026
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 26, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Mar 07, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12575913
Bioactive Intraosseous Dental Implant
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12575658
APPLICATOR WITH IN-LINE SENSOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12557896
COSMETIC APPLICATOR WITH FLEXIBLE APPLICATOR TIP
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 24, 2026
Patent 12521208
ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE WITH NON-SLIDING, TIED ARCHWIRE
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12522415
COSMETIC CONTAINERS, IN PARTICULAR A MASCARA CONTAINER
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

9-10
Expected OA Rounds
50%
Grant Probability
83%
With Interview (+33.4%)
3y 7m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 109 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month