Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/437,230

Electrospun polymer assemblies for medical implant applications

Final Rejection §102§103
Filed
Sep 08, 2021
Examiner
WHITE, KIA XIONG
Art Unit
3774
Tech Center
3700 — Mechanical Engineering & Manufacturing
Assignee
Xeltis AG
OA Round
4 (Final)
62%
Grant Probability
Moderate
5-6
OA Rounds
3y 10m
To Grant
99%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 62% of resolved cases
62%
Career Allow Rate
23 granted / 37 resolved
-7.8% vs TC avg
Strong +58% interview lift
Without
With
+58.3%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
3y 10m
Avg Prosecution
31 currently pending
Career history
68
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§103
51.6%
+11.6% vs TC avg
§102
23.5%
-16.5% vs TC avg
§112
19.1%
-20.9% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 37 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Claims 1-4, 6-9, 11-14, and 16-17 are pending and examined below. Response to Arguments Applicant's arguments filed 09/10/2025 have been fully considered but they are not persuasive. Applicant argues that the amendments to the independent claim overcome the rejections of record (pages 7-8) and that the dependent claims rise and fall with the same arguments (pages 7-8). Applicant's arguments are moot due to the additional reference applied to the newly added limitations, as detailed in the rejection below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 102 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1-4, 6, 11-14, & 16-17 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 102(a)(1) as being anticipated by Soletti (US 20160302911 A1). Regarding claim 1, Soletti teaches a cardiovascular medical implant (100, Fig. 1, ¶0071), comprising: (a) a first electrospun component (110a, Fig. 3B) having a type of biodegradable (¶0105) electrospun polymers (110a, Fig. 3B, ¶0107); (b) a second electrospun component (110b, Fig. 3B) having the same type of biodegradable (¶0105) electrospun polymers as in the first electrospun component (110a, Fig. 3B, ¶0117); and (c) a support structure (210, Figs. 1 & 3B) for supporting the cardiovascular medical implant, wherein the support structure is a stent, a frame, a braided structure or a mesh structure (spine 210, ¶0080), wherein the first electrospun component and the second electrospun component are assembled or joint together by the same type biodegradable electrospun polymers as in the first electrospun component and the second electrospun component (¶0117 & 0147), wherein the support structure (210, Fig. 3B) is sandwiched in a space in between the first electrospun component (110a, Fig. 3B) and the second electrospun component (110b, Fig. 3B) such that the support structure (210, Fig. 3B) is laminated in between the assembled and joint together first electrospun component and the second electrospun component (210 is positioned between one or more layers of fiber matrix, Fig. 2B, ¶0111), and wherein the assembled cardiovascular medical implant (100, Fig. 1, ¶0071) is a porous (¶0130), biodegradable (¶0105) surgical (¶0073) non-endoluminal and non-expandable implant (kink resistance, ¶0071-0072) capable of being replaced by naturally ingrown tissue over time upon implantation (¶0070). Regarding claim 2, Soletti teaches wherein the assembly or joint assembling the first electrospun component and the second electrospun component together is an ultrasonic weld or is a glued weld (adhesive, ¶0122). Regarding claim 3, Soletti teaches wherein the first electrospun component and the second electrospun component are components of a tissue engineered heart valve, a tissue engineered vascular graft, or a tissue engineered vessel (¶0071). Regarding claim 4, Soletti teaches wherein the first electrospun component and the second electrospun component are not sewn or stitched together, or the first electrospun component and the second electrospun component do not have any sewn areas or stitches (Soletti teaches adhesive therefore he would teach to not sew or stitch together the components, ¶0147). Regarding claim 6, Soletti teaches wherein the second electrospun component is separately manufactured from the first electrospun component (¶0147). Regarding claim 11, Soletti teaches a method of assembling two separately manufactured electrospun components to form a cardiovascular medical implant (¶0074), comprising: (a) electrospinning a first component (110a, Fig. 3B) using a type of biodegradable electrospun polymers (¶0105 & 0107); (b) electrospinning a second component (110b, Fig. 3B) using the same type of biodegradable (¶0105) electrospun polymers as in the first component (¶0105 & 0107); (c) having a support structure (210, Figs. 1 & 3B) for supporting the cardiovascular medical implant, wherein the support structure is a stent, a frame, a braided structure or a mesh structure (spine 210, ¶0080); and (d) assembling the first electrospun component and the second electrospun component by the same type biodegradable electrospun polymers as used in the first electrospun component and the second electrospun component (¶0117 & 0147), wherein during the assembling the support structure is sandwiched in a space in between the first electrospun component and the second electrospun component such that the support structure becomes laminated in between the assembled and joint together first electrospun component and the second electrospun component (210 is positioned between one or more layers of fiber matrix, Fig. 2B, ¶0111), wherein the assembled cardiovascular surgical non-endoluminal (100, ¶0071) and non- expandable (kink resistance, ¶0071-0072) implant (100, Fig. 1, ¶0071) is a porous (¶0130), biodegradable (¶0105) medical implant capable of being replaced by naturally ingrown tissue over time upon implantation (¶0070). Regarding claim 12, Soletti teaches wherein the assembling is ultrasonic welding, gluing or glue welding (adhesive, ¶0122). Regarding claim 13, Soletti teaches wherein the first electrospun component and the second electrospun component are components of a tissue engineered heart valve, a tissue engineered vascular graft, or a tissue engineered vessel (¶0071). Regarding claim 14, Soletti teaches wherein the first electrospun component and the second electrospun component are not sewn or stitched together, or the first electrospun component and the second electrospun component do not have any sewn areas or stitches (Soletti teaches adhesive therefore he would teach to not sew or stitch together the components, ¶0147). Regarding claim 16, Soletti teaches wherein the assembling step further comprises applying an assembling or bonding pattern to an area where the first electrospun component and the second electrospun component are assembled or joint together (pattern of fiber matrix 110, ¶0150). Regarding claim 17, Soletti teaches wherein the second component is electrospun separately from the first component (¶0147). Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 7-9 is/are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Soletti in view of Vidlund et al. (US 20140214159 A1) hereinafter, Vidlund. Regarding claim 7, Soletti teaches two separately manufactured electrospun components (110a & 110b, Fig. 3, ¶0117 & 0147, Soletti), each manufactured with the same type of biodegradable electrospun polymers (¶0105, Soletti), wherein the two separately manufactured electrospun components are assembled or joint together by the same type biodegradable electrospun polymers (¶0117 & 0147, Soletti), wherein the assembled tissue is a porous (¶0130, Soletti), biodegradable (¶0105, Soletti) surgical (¶0073, Soletti) non-endoluminal and non-expandable implant (kink resistance, ¶0071-0072, Soletti) capable of being replaced by naturally ingrown tissue over time upon implantation (¶0070, Soletti), wherein the two separately manufactured electrospun components have in between them a support structure (210, Fig. 3B, Soletti) for supporting the tissue, wherein the support structure is a stent, a frame, a braided structure or a mesh structure (spine 210, Fig. 1, ¶0080, Soletti), wherein the support structure is sandwiched in a space in between the two separately manufactured electrospun components (110a & 110b, Fig. 3B, Soletti) such that the support structure is laminated in between the assembled and joint together two separately manufactured electrospun components (210 is positioned between one or more layers of fiber matrix, Fig. 2B, ¶0111, Soletti). Soletti does not teach a tissue engineered heart valve. However, Vidlund teaches a multi-layer cover for a prosthetic heart valve (¶0017, Vidlund) wherein a tissue engineered heart valve (110, Fig. 2, Vidlund), comprising: two separately manufactured electrospun heart valve components (134 and another 134, Figs. 2A & 3B, ¶0399-0400, Vidlund), each manufactured with the same type of biodegradable electrospun polymers (¶0399-0400, Vidlund), wherein the assembled tissue engineered heart valve is a porous (¶0284, Vidlund), biodegradable surgical non-endoluminal (¶0288, Vidlund) implant capable of being replaced by naturally ingrown tissue over time upon implantation (¶0284, Vidlund), wherein the two separately manufactured electrospun heart valve components have in between them a support structure (132, Figs. 2A & 3B, ¶0399-0400, Vidlund) for supporting the tissue engineered heart valve (110, Fig. 2, Vidlund), wherein the support structure is a stent structure (132, Fig. 2A), a frame, a braided structure or a mesh structure, wherein the support structure is sandwiched in a space in between the two separately manufactured electrospun heart valve components such that the support structure is laminated in between the assembled and joint together two separately manufactured electrospun heart valve components (132, ¶0399-0400, Vidlund). It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art before the effective filing date of the claimed invention to modify the teachings of Soletti by incorporating a tissue engineered heart valve as taught by Vidlund in order to provide improved stability, in-growth of the prosthetic, maintain structural integrity over large cycles, addresses biocompatibility issues, address commissural regurgitation, and address hemocompatibility issues (of the heart implant) (¶0016, Vidlund). Regarding claim 8, Soletti teaches wherein the assembly or joint assembling the two separately manufactured electrospun heart valve components together is an ultrasonic weld or a glued weld (adhesive, ¶0122, Soletti). Regarding claim 9, Soletti teaches wherein the two separately manufactured electrospun heart valve components are not sewn or stitched together, or the two separately manufactured electrospun heart valve components do not have any sewn areas or stitches (Soletti teaches adhesive therefore he would teach to not sew or stitch together the components, ¶0147). Conclusion Applicant's amendment necessitated the new ground(s) of rejection presented in this Office action. Accordingly, THIS ACTION IS MADE FINAL. See MPEP § 706.07(a). Applicant is reminded of the extension of time policy as set forth in 37 CFR 1.136(a). A shortened statutory period for reply to this final action is set to expire THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of this action. In the event a first reply is filed within TWO MONTHS of the mailing date of this final action and the advisory action is not mailed until after the end of the THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, then the shortened statutory period will expire on the date the advisory action is mailed, and any nonprovisional extension fee (37 CFR 1.17(a)) pursuant to 37 CFR 1.136(a) will be calculated from the mailing date of the advisory action. In no event, however, will the statutory period for reply expire later than SIX MONTHS from the mailing date of this final action. Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to KIA XIONG WHITE whose telephone number is (703)756-4773. The examiner can normally be reached 0830-1630 EST. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jerrah Edwards can be reached at (408) 918-7557. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /K.X.W./Examiner, Art Unit 3774 /YASHITA SHARMA/Primary Patent Examiner, Art Unit 3774
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 08, 2021
Application Filed
May 03, 2024
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Aug 30, 2024
Response Filed
Nov 14, 2024
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Feb 25, 2025
Request for Continued Examination
Feb 25, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Feb 25, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Feb 26, 2025
Response after Non-Final Action
Jun 10, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Sep 10, 2025
Examiner Interview Summary
Sep 10, 2025
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Sep 10, 2025
Response Filed
Mar 13, 2026
Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12551344
HEART VALVE SEALING DEVICES AND DELIVERY DEVICES THEREFOR
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 17, 2026
Patent 12544222
GUIDE WIRE APPARATUSES AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Feb 10, 2026
Patent 12521260
RELEASABLE KNOTS FOR MEDICAL DEVICE DELIVERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 13, 2026
Patent 12514722
CAROTID ARTERY STENTING SYSTEMS AND METHODS
2y 5m to grant Granted Jan 06, 2026
Patent 12502294
MEDICAL DEVICE DELIVERY
2y 5m to grant Granted Dec 23, 2025
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

5-6
Expected OA Rounds
62%
Grant Probability
99%
With Interview (+58.3%)
3y 10m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 37 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month