Prosecution Insights
Last updated: April 19, 2026
Application No. 17/437,449

INSULATION ELEMENT FOR THERMAL AND/OR ACOUSTIC INSULATION OF A FLAT OR FLAT INCLINED ROOF AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING AN INSULATION ELEMENT

Non-Final OA §102§103
Filed
Sep 09, 2021
Examiner
MATZEK, MATTHEW D
Art Unit
1786
Tech Center
1700 — Chemical & Materials Engineering
Assignee
Rockwool A/S
OA Round
3 (Non-Final)
45%
Grant Probability
Moderate
3-4
OA Rounds
4y 0m
To Grant
84%
With Interview

Examiner Intelligence

Grants 45% of resolved cases
45%
Career Allow Rate
319 granted / 702 resolved
-19.6% vs TC avg
Strong +38% interview lift
Without
With
+38.4%
Interview Lift
resolved cases with interview
Typical timeline
4y 0m
Avg Prosecution
48 currently pending
Career history
750
Total Applications
across all art units

Statute-Specific Performance

§101
0.2%
-39.8% vs TC avg
§103
54.9%
+14.9% vs TC avg
§102
15.7%
-24.3% vs TC avg
§112
19.4%
-20.6% vs TC avg
Black line = Tech Center average estimate • Based on career data from 702 resolved cases

Office Action

§102 §103
DETAILED ACTION Notice of Pre-AIA or AIA Status The present application, filed on or after March 16, 2013, is being examined under the first inventor to file provisions of the AIA . Response to Amendment Applicant's request for reconsideration of the finality of the rejection of the last Office action is persuasive and, therefore, the finality of that action is withdrawn. Response to Arguments Applicant’s arguments, see Remarks, filed 1/22/2026, with respect to the rejection(s) of claim(s) 1–7 and 10–18 under 35 USC 103 have been fully considered and are persuasive. Therefore, the rejection has been withdrawn. However, upon further consideration, a new ground(s) of rejection is made below. Claim Rejections - 35 USC § 103 The text of those sections of Title 35, U.S. Code not included in this action can be found in a prior Office action. Claim(s) 1–7 and 10–18 are rejected under 35 U.S.C. 103 as being unpatentable over Beckers (US 2014/0190107 A1) in view of Brandt (WO 93/04242) and Jacobmeier (US 2021/0047548 A1). Beckers teaches an insulation element for thermal and/or acoustic insulation of a flat or flat inclined roof comprising a first layer made of stone wool fiber and cured binder, wherein the first layer 1 is adhered to a second layer 3 of glass fiber fleece by a layer of adhesive 2. Beckers abstract, ¶¶ 23, 25, 30–32, Figure. The first layer made of stone wool fiber comprises a binder and has a bulk density in the range of 100–250 kg/m3. Id. ¶ 30. Due to the location of the adhesive layer 2 between the first 1 and second 3 layers, it is reasonable to presume that forces directed perpendicular to the second layer can be compensated by the tensile strength of the second layer in combination with the adhesive. Beckers fails to teach that the first layer is made of at least one lamella having a fiber orientation predominantly perpendicular to major surfaces of the second layer. Brandt teaches the formation of a mineral fiber element comprising a first layer of mineral fibers and layers of adhesive binder that serve to attach a nonwoven sheet of glass fleece. Brandt 2:5–23, 3:5–15. The first layer of mineral fibers may comprise mineral wool lamellae, wherein the fibers are predominantly oriented in a direction which is substantially perpendicular to the main surfaces of the element and sheet of glass fibers fleece to increase the compression strength of the element. Id. at 4:32–5:10. Accordingly, it would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have used the mineral wool lamellae of Brandt in the insulation element of Beckers to provide improved its compression strength. Beckers and Brandt are silent as to a basis weight for an adhesive layer between layers of mineral fibers and glass fleece. Jacobmeier teaches a process for producing composite elements comprising an insulation material layer, adhesive, and an outer layer, wherein the insulation material may be mineral wool (e.g., glass wool, stone wool) for use in roofing. Jacobmeier abstract, ¶¶ 2, 43. To bond the outer layer and the insulation material layer, the adhesive may be applied to either layer at preferred levels of 50 to 150 g/m2. Id. ¶ 64. It would have been obvious to one of ordinary skill in the art to have looked to Jacobmeier for guidance as to suitable basis weights for adhesive application to mineral wool insulation products to successfully practice the invention of Beckers. Claims 5 and 6 are rejected as the requirement that the adhesive be a “dry applied adhesive” is a product-by-process limitation, which is met by adhesive layer 2 that fully face the first and second layers. See Beckers Figure. Claims 3, 13, and 14 are rejected as the roofing insulation element of Beckers is connectable to a membrane by cold gluing. Beckers ¶ 21. The adhesive layer in Beckers may comprise silane-modified phenol-formaldehyde binder. Id. ¶¶ 18, 34. Although Beckers does not explicitly teach the claimed property of a compression strength between 50 and 130 kPa and glass fleece E-modulus of 500–800 MPa and/or a tensile strength between 70 and 90 N according to EN ISO 1924-2:2009, it is reasonable to presume that said properties are inherent to Beckers. Support for said presumption is found in the use of like materials (i.e. stone wool and binder layer of the claimed bulk density and glass fiber fleece). The burden is upon Applicant to prove otherwise. In re Fitzgerald 205 USPQ 594. In addition, the presently claimed property of a compression strength between 50 and 130 kPa would obviously have been present one the Beckers product is provided. Note In re Best, 195 USPQ at 433, footnote (CCPA 1977) as to the providing of this rejection made above under 35 USC 102. Reliance upon inherency is not improper even though rejection is based on Section 103 instead of Section 102. In re Skoner, 517 F.2d 947 (CCPA 1975). Conclusion Any inquiry concerning this communication or earlier communications from the examiner should be directed to MATTHEW D MATZEK whose telephone number is (571)272-5732. The examiner can normally be reached M-F 9:30-6. Examiner interviews are available via telephone, in-person, and video conferencing using a USPTO supplied web-based collaboration tool. To schedule an interview, applicant is encouraged to use the USPTO Automated Interview Request (AIR) at http://www.uspto.gov/interviewpractice. If attempts to reach the examiner by telephone are unsuccessful, the examiner’s supervisor, Jennifer Boyd can be reached at 571.272.7783. The fax phone number for the organization where this application or proceeding is assigned is 571-273-8300. Information regarding the status of published or unpublished applications may be obtained from Patent Center. Unpublished application information in Patent Center is available to registered users. To file and manage patent submissions in Patent Center, visit: https://patentcenter.uspto.gov. Visit https://www.uspto.gov/patents/apply/patent-center for more information about Patent Center and https://www.uspto.gov/patents/docx for information about filing in DOCX format. For additional questions, contact the Electronic Business Center (EBC) at 866-217-9197 (toll-free). If you would like assistance from a USPTO Customer Service Representative, call 800-786-9199 (IN USA OR CANADA) or 571-272-1000. /MATTHEW D MATZEK/Primary Examiner, Art Unit 1786
Read full office action

Prosecution Timeline

Sep 09, 2021
Application Filed
May 09, 2025
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103
Aug 06, 2025
Response Filed
Oct 21, 2025
Final Rejection — §102, §103
Jan 16, 2026
Examiner Interview Summary
Jan 16, 2026
Applicant Interview (Telephonic)
Jan 22, 2026
Response after Non-Final Action
Feb 24, 2026
Non-Final Rejection — §102, §103 (current)

Precedent Cases

Applications granted by this same examiner with similar technology

Patent 12600072
HIGHLY CRYSTALLINE POLY(LACTIC ACID) FILAMENTS FOR MATERIAL-EXTRUSION BASED ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12600111
ELASTIC MEMBER AND DISPLAY DEVICE COMPRISING SAME
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 14, 2026
Patent 12597532
METAL-INSIDE-FIBER-COMPOSITE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING A METAL-AND-FIBER-COMPOSITE
2y 5m to grant Granted Apr 07, 2026
Patent 12576572
FILAMENT COMPOSITION
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Patent 12576619
LAYERED CONTAINMENT FEATURES
2y 5m to grant Granted Mar 17, 2026
Study what changed to get past this examiner. Based on 5 most recent grants.

AI Strategy Recommendation

Get an AI-powered prosecution strategy using examiner precedents, rejection analysis, and claim mapping.
Powered by AI — typically takes 5-10 seconds

Prosecution Projections

3-4
Expected OA Rounds
45%
Grant Probability
84%
With Interview (+38.4%)
4y 0m
Median Time to Grant
High
PTA Risk
Based on 702 resolved cases by this examiner. Grant probability derived from career allow rate.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month